Most Corporate Travel Policies Lack Sustainability Considerations
Most companies do not have sustainable travel considerations written into travel policies, according to a recent survey (PDF) by the Association of Corporate Travel Executives and travel technology firm KDS (via the Transnational).
The survey found that only a third of companies presently have travel policies that promote sustainable travel. A further third were developing such policies, but only 20 percent of these respondents said that companies encourage their staff to use travel providers with lower carbon emissions.
Twenty percent of respondents said their company travel departments were required to produce carbon emissions reports for senior management.
The environment was not a major travel concern, according to ACTE. Employee security came top, with 81 percent of respondents feeling it was a high priority; cost control came second, with 77 percent ranking it as a high priority; in contrast, most respondents (45 percent) saw environmental sustainability as a low priority, with only 20 percent ranking it a high priority for companies.
Companies also appear reluctant to cut down on travel in order to reduce emissions. Only 23 percent of respondents said their company had encouraged journeys to be reduced to support environmental sustainability.
The survey comes at a time when air travel has faced harsh criticism as a contributor to global warming.
Earlier this month, TRX launched a carbon emissions model to provide corporations with data detailing the impact of employee travel on the environment.
Stay Up-to-Date On Environmental Management, Energy & Sustainability News with EL's Free Daily Newsletter
Energy Manager News
- Bridgewater, MA, Gets $231,000 Efficiency Grant
- Biomass Group Studies Role in Clean Power Plan
- Rockleigh Borough Installing LEDs, Low Energy AC
- PHG to Build Big Gasification Plant for Sevier Solid Waste
- Energy Profile of Commercial Buildings Changing
- Smart Meter Market Surging
- Modular Data Centers Cut Construction Costs
- Failure to Build Energy Infrastructure Could Cost New England $5.4B