March 21, 2007
Carbon Offset Companies Criticized, TerraPass Responds
A close look at several carbon offset transactions – including those involving the Oscar presenters and Vail Resorts – reveals that some deals amount to little more than feel-good hype, Business Week reports.
The Academy of Motion Picture Arts & Sciences offsets were issued by TerraPass, a company that identifies climate-protection efforts and, for a fee, gives its customers the opportunity to buy renewable energy certificates.
One of TerraPass’s largest offset projects is a methane-burning garbage dump in Arkansas from which TerraPass has purchased thousands of tons of gas reductions.
But the article argues that the methane burning system was launched long before any promise of carbon-offset sales, making it appear that the main effects of the TerraPass offsets are to salve guilty celebrity consciences and provide the dump’s operators with extra revenue.
TerraPass has responded to the article, saying that it will conduct a review of the landfill gas project. “We’re conducting this review to reaffirm that the Tontitown project is a worthwhile recipient of our members’ funds, and we are doing it in full public view. All of the source documents we collect, all of the interviews we conduct, all of our own notes will be posted to a publicly accessible web site. Anybody can review them and send questions or feedback.”
At the end of the week, TerraPass says it will write up the results of its review and present them to a panel of experts on carbon markets and climate change. It is making all of its project review documents, the working version of the report that it will hand over to the panel, and all the details of how the review process will work, available here.
The company has also posted numerous responses to the article on its blog. One of those blog entries, says that “Determining additionality – the notion that projects would not have happened if not for the purchase of offsets – is hard, and we’re liable to make mistakes. Not all of the science or the policy is settled. We’re a young company in a young industry with a lot of promise. But, if the industry is to be a part of solving climate change, we must get this right.”
Another REC buyer is Vail Resorts, which declares in marketing material that it is “100% powered by wind.” But Vail hasn’t built wind turbines. It buys RECs equivalent to its annual electricity use.
Vail’s broker, Renewable Choice Energy, declined to identify any of the wind project investments it makes on behalf of Vail Resorts for Business Week. Nor did Vail or Renewable Choice Energy discuss the price of the RECs.
“If neither a seller of RECs nor the buyer will provide any details of how, exactly, their transaction is reducing carbon emissions, I would suspect it’s vaporware,” says Randy Udall, director of the Community Office for Resource Efficiency, an Aspen, Colorado nonprofit that promotes renewable energy.
Advertisers
Enhance Sustainability. Improve Profitability.
Learn how at the SAP Sustainability Resource Center. >>
Unclear about the EPA's new GHG Rule?
Learn how it could affect your business. >>
EPA mandatory emissions reporting starts Jan 1st
CSA Standards can help your organization get ready for compliance. Find out how. >>
Product Environmental Compliance Best Practices
How to achieve compliance at a significantly lower cost. Download the full report. >>
Join the Discussion
Recent Daily News [ see all ]
- 11/20/2009
- 11/19/2009
- 11/18/2009
- Ontario May Follow California’s Lead on TV Energy Efficiency
- EPA Is One Step Closer to New Ship Emissions Standards
- European Paper Industry Cuts CO2 Emissions by 42% since 1990
- CDP Launches Water Disclosure Project
- Whirlpool Cuts Water Use by Nearly 22% from 2004 to 2008
- National Grid Again Rejects High Costs of Offshore Wind
- California City’s Green Building Ordinance Applies to Commercial Buildings
- Agilent To Save $3.5M Over 10 Years With Solar
- S. America Takes Most Urgent View of Copenhagen Talks
- Texas, China Wind Partners May Build U.S. Factory to Appease Critical Lawmaker
- Volvo, Mack Engines First to Meet 2010 EPA Emissions Standards
- Around the Web – Nike, Google, Nissan, Bush’s Green Library, WWF
- Fossil Fuel Emissions Rose 29% since 2000
- SEC Charges Four in ‘Green’ Investment Ponzi Scheme
- No Sunny Skies for Two Solar Projects in Texas, California
- Canada Delays GHG Emissions Regs, Russia Ups Emissions Cuts
- News Corp. Taps Hara for Energy Efficiency, Environmental Management
- Rising Sea Levels Would Hit U.S. East Coast Hardest
- Building an Energy-Efficient Data Center Using Virtualization Technology
- Trade Group on EPA Chemical Regs: ‘If Everything is a Priority, Then Nothing is a Priority’
- A/V Equipment Gets New Energy Star Requirements
- By Scaling Back Catalogs, JC Penney to Save 30% on Paper
- Around the Web – Starbucks, EcoFactor, UPS, Brownfields, Eco-Labels
- Subaru Touts Energy & Environmental Initiatives
- U.S., China Partner on Renewable Energy, Energy Efficiency
- Green Buildings Do Double Duty: Reduce Energy Use, Lower Financial Risk
- UK to Ease Rules for On-Site Renewable Energy Installations
- Intel Eyes Wind, Electric Cars
- Nike Tops Annual Climate Action Scores
- Iranian Tanker Firm to Cut Fuel Use 28%
- Corporate Jetsetters Can be Carbon Offsetters
- USPS Energy Use Down 9% From 2005 to 2008
- From Solar Applications to Christmas, LEDs Light the Night
- EPA May Regulate Sulfur Dioxide Emissions on Hourly Basis
- MITEI: Sustainable Energy & Terawatt-Scale Photovoltaics
- Around the Web – Health Care & Energy, Shell, NBC
Charts [ see all ]
Popular Topics
Energy Efficiency
Data Center
Emissions
Facilities
Electricity
Sustainability
Water
Supply Chain
Efficiency
Green Marketing
Strategy & Leadership
Research
Fleets & Transportation
Carbon Finance
Conventional Energy
Clean Energy
Waste & Recycling
Paper & Packaging
Policy & Law
Utilities
Construction
Comments and Discussions
Trade Association on Trade Group on EPA Chemical Regs: ‘If Everything is a Priority, Then Nothing is a Priority’
"Seriously… that..."
Gary Markowitz on Supermarkets Tackle Emissions Reductions, Fuel Efficiency
"Supermarkets waste over 10 percent of their energy through improper..."
peter in ireland on Ontario May Follow California’s Lead on TV Energy Efficiency
"Governor Schwarzenegger is shooting himself in the foot! 1...."
Environmental Leader on S. America Takes Most Urgent View of Copenhagen Talks
"The survey respondents (the PDF report mentions 4,000 respondents in 38..."
Jake on UPS Trying New Hydraulic Hybrid Trucks
"A point of clarification: the Reuters press release referenced herein reports that 20 UPS will purchase..."
Custom Organic Shirts on S. America Takes Most Urgent View of Copenhagen Talks
"90% of North Americans believe it is urgent to get a global climate..."
peter dublin on California City’s Green Building Ordinance Applies to Commercial Buildings
"Why energy efficiebnt regulation on buildings –..."





Reader Comments
Paul, nice article, and nice Business Week link as well, this is the kinda thing that I was talking about last week,
We should change the name to:
COBS carbon offsets, and we all now what the bs stands for.
Regards,
Brian Mello
Brian Mello | May 31st, 2007
Carbon offsets are the easiest way for corporations to brag about how green they are, with some 350 US corporations buying carbon credits, some with as many as six locations or more, since we only have 1% renewable energy generation, let your calculator tell you, these companies know that carbon reduction is the answer, but they take the easy way out, and make headlines doing so. Some of them get awards too! How nice, what a deal, Phoney energy offsets for phoney corporations. Sounds good, keep up the good work, all of America is so proud of you. GW
Gary Wayne | October 25th, 2007