A coalition of academics and polluters is saying that a simple tax on each ton of emissions would prove more efficient and less bureaucratic than a cap-and-trade system, Washington Post reports.
A carbon tax offers certainty about the price of polluting, which appeals to many economists and businesses, according to the article. William A. Pizer, a senior fellow at the centrist think tank Resources for the Future and a former senior economist for President Bush’s Council of Economic Advisers, estimates that the benefit-to-cost ratio of a tax-based system would be five times that of a cap-and-trade system.
But according to Fred Krupp, president of Environmental Defense, such a tax ”doesn’t give us the guarantee the emissions will go down.”
The article reports that only one House Democrat, Rep. Pete Stark (Calif.), has drafted a carbon tax proposal.
Responding to the article in the National Association of Manufacturers blog, Pat Cleary writes “‘First, let’s see the science and second, let’s see how a ‘tax’ - any tax - will work, and let’s make sure it’s not going to be a job killer. Then maybe ‘industry’ will weigh in. ‘Til then, let’s not mis-characterize things or see support where there is none.”
Retailers, Developers and Eco-Business Leaders...learn about green retail trends, consumer buying habits and sustainable business practices. Register NOW to Attend!
The 2008 Green Leaders Survey collects sustainability program insights from business and civic leaders. Learn from peers what works and what doesn't. Take survey>>
Recycling rates in the U.S. are low and getting lower. The U.S., by far the world's biggest consumer of aluminum ... continue »
Nearly three-quarters (73 percent) of financial institution executives say they plan to build new or undergo a major remodel of an existing ...
click to view full size chart »
This promotional video features restaurateurs discussing sustainable solutions and Conserve, the environmental initiative of the National Restaurant Association....
Join the Discussion