Climate Change Corp. has an interesting article about the Chicago Climate Exchange, which began in 2003 with just 13 companies and the City of Chicago as members, but has grown to more than 250 members today.
In 2006, CCX contracts covering 10 million (metric) tons of emissions were traded, up from just 1.5 million in 2005. And volumes continue to rise. In the first two months of 2007, more than five million metric tons were traded.
Many companies involved, like Green Mountain Energy, say they are seeking to gain experience in carbon trading markets in anticipation of mandatory caps, while prices are low and trades are less risky.
Some, like DuPont and IBM, are more concerned with documenting reductions they are making in hopes of getting credit for them when caps do become mandatory.
Others, including American Electric Power, also want to show their shareholders and consumers that they are being proactive on climate change..
Retailers, Developers and Eco-Business Leaders...learn about green retail trends, consumer buying habits and sustainable business practices. Register NOW to Attend!
The 2008 Green Leaders Survey collects sustainability program insights from business and civic leaders. Learn from peers what works and what doesn't. Take survey>>
Today's combination of dwindling natural resources, economic uncertainty, and the growing threat of global warming underscores the urgent need to embrace "being ... continue »
The National Geographic Society and the international polling firm GlobeScan have unveiled a new mechanism for measuring and comparing individual consumer behavior ...
Joe Sprouls gives a tour of Citigroup's $310 million Green Skyscraper.
Comments
Have there been any reports of profits made from trading? Some of these companies must be hoping to make a buck or two by defining their baseline and then switching to an energy saving technology, collect a subsidy for it, and trade their carbon credits for cash? Is there any proof of this?
professor keanbean November 2nd, 2007