August 1, 2007
Only Small Number of Fortune 500 Embrace Sustainability
There is no green business bubble, according to a CNN/Money article by Joel Makower. “Once companies wring out the resource waste, toxic ingredients, embedded energy and carbon intensity of their products and services, there’s no turning back.”
Some green products and companies might be left behind, but energy efficiency, waste reduction, pollution prevention, supply-chain management, environmental reporting “will be around in one form or another for decades.”
Furthermore, green business has not hit critical mass. No more than a dozen, if that, of the Fortune 500 have embraced sustainability as a core business strategy, according to Makower. And small and midsized companies remain largely uninvolved.
Why? According to the article the incentives that are needed to push companies in a green direction, whether from government, customers, suppliers, employees, job seekers, bankers or most other business partners and stakeholders, simply don’t exist. “For most firms,” Makower writes, ”going green remains an investment with questionable or underwhelming payoffs.”
Advertisers
Enhance Sustainability. Improve Profitability.
Learn how at the SAP Sustainability Resource Center. >>
EFFECTIVELY MANAGE WATER COMPLIANCE
Understand how increased enforcement may affect your company. Find out more >>
EPA mandatory emissions reporting starts Jan 1st
CSA Standards can help your organization get ready for compliance. Find out how. >>
Join the Discussion
Recent Daily News [ see all ]
- 11/06/2009
- 11/05/2009
- 11/04/2009
- Emissions Intensity Falling Globally
- JohnsonDiversey Ups GHG Reduction Target to 25%
- Sainsbury’s Offers Free London Electric Car Charging
- Carbon Trading Could Trigger a ‘Sub-prime Style’ Economic Crash
- Peabody, Exxon Accused of Undermining Climate Talks
- BMW, Toyota, Ford Tout Eco-cars
- In ‘Apathy Gap,’ Energy Efficiency at Home Ranks Low
- China Pushes for CO2 Storage, Not Emissions Reductions
- Clean Tech VC Funding On Rebound, Up 50% Since 2nd Quarter
- IECC Building Code Recommendations Add Up to 30% in Energy Efficiency Gains
- Disney Buys $7M in Reforestation Offsets, a Corporate Record
- McKesson to Save $300K Via Fuel-Efficient Vehicles
- Sprint to Save $2.1M With Eco-Friendly Packaging
- U.S. Export-Import Bank Adopts Carbon Policy to Support Renewable Energy
- Greening the Automotive Supply Chain
- Yokohama Rubber Cuts GHG Emissions 13.4% in 2008
- Electronics Industry Lawsuit Called ‘Attack on States’ Rights’
- Wal-Mart Adding LEDs to 650 Stores
- One Committee Down for Senate Climate Bill, Five More to Go
- EU Poised to Give Heavy Industry Free Carbon Permits
- ResponsibleTravel.com Scuttles Carbon Offsetting Option
- U.S. Cap-and-Trade Creates Winners and Losers among Largest Emitters
- DOE Awards $155M to Make Industrial Sector More Energy Efficient
- System Upgrades Power Up Energy Savings for Hotels
- Xerox Cuts GHG Emissions by 20% from 2002
- Waste Management Landfill Gas Project Complete
- Intel, Pepsi, Kohl’s Stay Atop Green Power Partnership list
- Wal-Mart Thinks Big With Smaller Stores
- Despite Critics, Gore ‘Proud’ to Invest in Green Firms
- Metal Recyclers Spar Over Ship Recycling Site
Industry Voices [ see all ]
A Roadmap for a Renewable Energy Partnership
Brad Cashaw
Vice President
Quaker Foods and Snacks Supply Chain and Sustainability
Forest Carbon Core to Climate Change Deal
Chris Elliott
Forest Carbon Initiative Lead
World Wildlife Fund
VCS and CarbonFix Tops in Review of Forestry Carbon Standards
Paulo Lopes
Carbon Management Consultant
Carbon Clear







Reader Comments
You’re pointing to a very interesting fact, which to me is a surprise. As a corporate communications consultancy, we work with a number of established technology firms that fully understand the benefits of embracing sustainability. Our point — which we’ve made in a white paper published today — is that public pressure will soon force companies to embrace sustainability. In order to do this credibly, companies need to align communications and operations in order to avoid the “green washing” label.
Burghardt Tenderich | August 1st, 2007
They need state and federal incentives.
Also, more interaction with small green companies who can provide cost lowering green solutions.
SK
Shawn Kalin | August 2nd, 2007
There is no doubt a gap exists between sustainability trend setters, C-suite policy statements and day-to-day procurement practices along the B2B supply chain. That said, early movers who customize relevant sustainability initiatives into their business value proposition will be the ones who will be best able to show its commercial (not philanthropic) potential.
Lyn Brown | August 2nd, 2007
I think the number of environmentally committed companies is much higher than reported. The difficulty is in standardizing the definition of green. Many in my company (Citi Smith Barney) believe that management that embraces good stewardship of the environment translates to good corporate stewardship.
Keith Winterhalter | August 2nd, 2007
Many of the trend setters in sustainability are executing their strategies for a “competitive advantage” reasons. The majority of firms will most likely be forced to tackle sustainability for “liscense to operate” issues. They will need to grow, expand and enter into new markets and these actions will require them to take a sustainable approach to successfully execute their strategy.
Jerry | August 3rd, 2007