<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Qantas Plans September Takeoff For Carbon Offset Program</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.environmentalleader.com/2007/08/30/qantas-plans-september-takeoff-for-carbon-offset-program/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.environmentalleader.com/2007/08/30/qantas-plans-september-takeoff-for-carbon-offset-program/</link>
	<description>The Executive's Daily Green Briefing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 20:47:55 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sean O</title>
		<link>http://www.environmentalleader.com/2007/08/30/qantas-plans-september-takeoff-for-carbon-offset-program/comment-page-1/#comment-9588</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean O</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 04:57:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.environmentalleader.com/2007/08/30/qantas-plans-september-takeoff-for-carbon-offset-program/#comment-9588</guid>
		<description>I write about this a lot on my site that covers global warming (http://www.globalwarming-factorfiction.com) and I am typically very skeptical of carbon trading schemes.

P.T. Barnum supposedly said that there was a sucker born every minute. Sometimes, when I read about carbon credits, I am not sure who the sucker is - the person buying, the person selling, or the general public for thinking it is helping!

In order for credits to be feasible and to be more than a Ã¢â‚¬Å“feel goodÃ¢â‚¬? gesture, we need solid accounting, accountability, and penalties. We have none of that now and this article makes this painfully clear. We cannot allow credits to be used for minor contributions to a project. The credit must go to the cost of reducing the greenhouse gas.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I write about this a lot on my site that covers global warming (<a href="http://www.globalwarming-factorfiction.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.globalwarming-factorfiction.com</a>) and I am typically very skeptical of carbon trading schemes.</p>
<p>P.T. Barnum supposedly said that there was a sucker born every minute. Sometimes, when I read about carbon credits, I am not sure who the sucker is &#8211; the person buying, the person selling, or the general public for thinking it is helping!</p>
<p>In order for credits to be feasible and to be more than a Ã¢â‚¬Å“feel goodÃ¢â‚¬? gesture, we need solid accounting, accountability, and penalties. We have none of that now and this article makes this painfully clear. We cannot allow credits to be used for minor contributions to a project. The credit must go to the cost of reducing the greenhouse gas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
