Carmakers Lose Emissions Case, California Waits For EPA Decision

September 13, 2007

Email this story Print this post Add your comments

Vermont federal Judge William K. Sessions III has rejected challenges from auto manufacturers and upheld a state law that requires a 30 percent cut in greenhouse gas emissions from cars, The New York Times reports.

Judge Sessions ruled that the auto manufacturers had not proved their claims that compliance with the 30 percent cut was not feasible or their claims that federal laws took precedence over state rules.

The decision follows a Supreme Court ruling in April that the Environmental Protection Agency violated the Clean Air Act by declining to regulate greenhouse gas emissions from vehicles, The Washington Post reports. The ruling in Vermont explicitly endorses the idea that California – the case there is still pending – has the right to set its own regulations on the gases, and that other states, like Vermont, have the right to follow its lead. Following the ruling by the Supreme Court, Bush signed an executive order directing the departments of Transportation, Agriculture and Energy and the Environmental Protection Agency to craft regulations that will cut gasoline consumption and greenhouse gas emissions from motor vehicles and to have the rules in place by the end of 2008

Under the U.S. Clean Air Act, California can set emissions rules that are stricter than federal standards once it obtains a waiver from the EPA, which says it will make a decision on California’s waiver request by the end of the year. The Clean Air Act allows other states to adopt California’s rules or the federal government’s.

Sessions said in his ruling that he assumed the EPA would grant California the waiver, Bloomberg reports. If California is denied a waiver, the Vermont rules are invalid, he said.

Governors of California, New York, Massachusetts, Pennsylvania and nine other states sent a letter to chief executive officers of GM, Ford Motor Co., Toyota Motor North America and three other automakers today asking that the industry drop legal challenges to their efforts to lower carbon emissions, citing a recent U.S. Supreme Court ruling that the EPA has authority to regulate greenhouse gases.

Dave McCurdy, president of the Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers, said automakers support improving fuel economy standards nationally rather than piecemeal. McCurdy, in a statement, said the alliance was considering an appeal, according to the Washington Post article.

“This ruling takes away the last excuse for delay -? it’s time for EPA to clear the way for cleaner cars,” said Jim Tripp, General Counsel for Environmental Defense, who helped argue the VT case. “The U.S. auto industry should stop litigating and start innovating.”

Email this story Print this post Add your comments

Advertisers

Make sustainability part of your strategy.

Get equipped at the SAP Sustainability Resource Center. >>

Unclear about the EPA's new GHG Rule?

Learn how it could affect your business. >>

EPA mandatory emissions reporting starts Jan 1st

CSA Standards can help your organization get ready for compliance. Find out how. >>

Best Practices: Product Environmental Compliance

How to achieve compliance at a significantly lower cost. Download the full report. >>

Join the Discussion

Reader Comments

What silliness…

If California and Vermont really want to reduce CO2 emissions, it only means one thing: higher gas mileage or less miles traveled. There is no ‘catalytic converter’ for CO2 like their was for hydrocarbon and NOX emissions.

So… Cali and Vermont: raise your gas taxes, increase taxes on vehicles with engines larger than 2.0L, make drivers get a special permit to get a vehicle over 4,000#

It really is the only way.

Kent | September 14th, 2007

Kent, I don’t follow your logic. If the state of California has the right to regulate automobile emissions of CO2, then it has the right to do so. If automobile manufacturers can only do that by raising fuel efficiency, then they will have to raise fuel efficiency, won’t they? That means higher gas mileage. So this law suit (if it succeeds) does exactly what it needs to: push auto manufacturers toward higher gas mileage, while cleaning up California’s air (lets not forget all the *other* pollutants that are reduced via higher gas mileage) and fighting global warning.

Nothing “silly” about that.

Brian | November 12th, 2007

Recent Daily News [ see all ]

11/20/2009
11/19/2009
11/18/2009

Charts [ see all ]

European Paper Industry Cuts CO2 Emissions by 42% since 1990

S. America Takes Most Urgent View of Copenhagen Talks

Nike Tops Annual Climate Action Scores

Oceans May Trap more Carbon than Forests

Jobs

View All Jobs >> Post a Job >>

Comments and Discussions

Trade Association on Trade Group on EPA Chemical Regs: ‘If Everything is a Priority, Then Nothing is a Priority’
"Seriously… that..."

Gary Markowitz on Supermarkets Tackle Emissions Reductions, Fuel Efficiency
"Supermarkets waste over 10 percent of their energy through improper..."

peter in ireland on Ontario May Follow California’s Lead on TV Energy Efficiency
"Governor Schwarzenegger is shooting himself in the foot! 1...."

Environmental Leader on S. America Takes Most Urgent View of Copenhagen Talks
"The survey respondents (the PDF report mentions 4,000 respondents in 38..."

Jake on UPS Trying New Hydraulic Hybrid Trucks
"A point of clarification: the Reuters press release referenced herein reports that 20 UPS will purchase..."

Custom Organic Shirts on S. America Takes Most Urgent View of Copenhagen Talks
"90% of North Americans believe it is urgent to get a global climate..."

peter dublin on California City’s Green Building Ordinance Applies to Commercial Buildings
"Why energy efficiebnt regulation on buildings –..."

Environmental Leader