<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Carmakers Lose Emissions Case, California Waits For EPA Decision</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.environmentalleader.com/2007/09/13/carmakers-lose-emissions-case-california-waits-for-epa-decision/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.environmentalleader.com/2007/09/13/carmakers-lose-emissions-case-california-waits-for-epa-decision/</link>
	<description>The Executive's Daily Green Briefing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 18:36:47 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://www.environmentalleader.com/2007/09/13/carmakers-lose-emissions-case-california-waits-for-epa-decision/comment-page-1/#comment-20682</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2007 22:33:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.environmentalleader.com/2007/09/13/carmakers-lose-emissions-case-california-waits-for-epa-decision/#comment-20682</guid>
		<description>Kent, I don&#039;t follow your logic. If the state of California has the right to regulate automobile emissions of CO2, then it has the right to do so. If automobile manufacturers can only do that by raising fuel efficiency, then they will have to raise fuel efficiency, won&#039;t they? That means higher gas mileage. So this law suit (if it succeeds) does exactly what it needs to: push auto manufacturers toward higher gas mileage, while cleaning up California&#039;s air (lets not forget all the *other* pollutants that are reduced via higher gas mileage) and fighting global warning.

Nothing &quot;silly&quot; about that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kent, I don&#8217;t follow your logic. If the state of California has the right to regulate automobile emissions of CO2, then it has the right to do so. If automobile manufacturers can only do that by raising fuel efficiency, then they will have to raise fuel efficiency, won&#8217;t they? That means higher gas mileage. So this law suit (if it succeeds) does exactly what it needs to: push auto manufacturers toward higher gas mileage, while cleaning up California&#8217;s air (lets not forget all the *other* pollutants that are reduced via higher gas mileage) and fighting global warning.</p>
<p>Nothing &#8220;silly&#8221; about that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kent</title>
		<link>http://www.environmentalleader.com/2007/09/13/carmakers-lose-emissions-case-california-waits-for-epa-decision/comment-page-1/#comment-10880</link>
		<dc:creator>Kent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2007 17:11:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.environmentalleader.com/2007/09/13/carmakers-lose-emissions-case-california-waits-for-epa-decision/#comment-10880</guid>
		<description>What silliness... 

If California and Vermont really want to reduce CO2 emissions, it only means one thing: higher gas mileage or less miles traveled. There is no &#039;catalytic converter&#039; for CO2 like their was for hydrocarbon and NOX emissions. 

So... Cali and Vermont: raise your gas taxes, increase taxes on vehicles with engines larger than 2.0L, make drivers get a special permit to get a vehicle over 4,000#

It really is the only way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What silliness&#8230; </p>
<p>If California and Vermont really want to reduce CO2 emissions, it only means one thing: higher gas mileage or less miles traveled. There is no &#8216;catalytic converter&#8217; for CO2 like their was for hydrocarbon and NOX emissions. </p>
<p>So&#8230; Cali and Vermont: raise your gas taxes, increase taxes on vehicles with engines larger than 2.0L, make drivers get a special permit to get a vehicle over 4,000#</p>
<p>It really is the only way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
