<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dow Corning To Install $50 Million Plasma Recycling System</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.environmentalleader.com/2007/10/02/dow-corning-to-install-50-million-plasma-recycling-system/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.environmentalleader.com/2007/10/02/dow-corning-to-install-50-million-plasma-recycling-system/</link>
	<description>Environmental Leader</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 17:25:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ramrod</title>
		<link>http://www.environmentalleader.com/2007/10/02/dow-corning-to-install-50-million-plasma-recycling-system/comment-page-1/#comment-196821</link>
		<dc:creator>ramrod</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 May 2010 12:35:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.environmentalleader.com/2007/10/02/dow-corning-to-install-50-million-plasma-recycling-system/#comment-196821</guid>
		<description>Hey Phil, that data coming out of IPCC was pretty convenient too, eh?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Phil, that data coming out of IPCC was pretty convenient too, eh?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil Berry</title>
		<link>http://www.environmentalleader.com/2007/10/02/dow-corning-to-install-50-million-plasma-recycling-system/comment-page-1/#comment-13847</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil Berry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 18:41:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.environmentalleader.com/2007/10/02/dow-corning-to-install-50-million-plasma-recycling-system/#comment-13847</guid>
		<description>I appreciate your newsletter, it is the only one I read religiously. 

However, you need to vet your wording more carefully.  This effort is not necessarily bad but it is also not recycling - it is &quot;thermal waste treatment with resource recovery&quot;.  There is also a convenient omission of the environmental impacts of the emissions from the gasification process.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I appreciate your newsletter, it is the only one I read religiously. </p>
<p>However, you need to vet your wording more carefully.  This effort is not necessarily bad but it is also not recycling &#8211; it is &#8220;thermal waste treatment with resource recovery&#8221;.  There is also a convenient omission of the environmental impacts of the emissions from the gasification process.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

