October 3, 2007
China To Phase Out Incandescent Light Bulbs
Over the next 10 years, China, which makes 70 percent of the world’s lightbulbs, has agreed to phase out incandescent bulbs in favor of more energy-efficient ones through a program backed by the Global Environment Facility, Reuters reports.
The switch could mitigate 500 million tonnes of carbon dioxide annually, equal to about half the climate-warming emissions of Germany.
China is the first developing country to agree to join this program, said Monique Barbut, chief executive officer of the Global Environment Facility. The Facility will invest about $25 million for the Chinese program.
Other countries including Mexico, Indonesia, Venezuela and Costa Rica may join in future, Barbut said.
With a current trust fund of about $3.2 billion, the Washington, D.C.-based Global Environment Facility is the financial arm for international intergovernmental agreements on biodiversity, climate change and persistent organic pollutants, according to Reuters.
In March, EU leaders decided that The European Union’s 490 million citizens will have to use energy-efficient lighting by the end of the decade.
Australia has announced it would phase out incandescents and Greenpeace has asked India to follow Australia’s lead.
Advertisers
Enhance Sustainability. Improve Profitability.
Learn how at the SAP Sustainability Resource Center. >>
Unclear about the EPA's new GHG Rule?
Learn how it could affect your business. >>
EPA mandatory emissions reporting starts Jan 1st
CSA Standards can help your organization get ready for compliance. Find out how. >>
Best Practices: Product Environmental Compliance
How to achieve compliance at a significantly lower cost. Download the full report. >>
Join the Discussion
Recent Daily News [ see all ]
- 11/20/2009
- 11/19/2009
- 11/18/2009
- Ontario May Follow California’s Lead on TV Energy Efficiency
- EPA Is One Step Closer to New Ship Emissions Standards
- European Paper Industry Cuts CO2 Emissions by 42% since 1990
- CDP Launches Water Disclosure Project
- Whirlpool Cuts Water Use by Nearly 22% from 2004 to 2008
- National Grid Again Rejects High Costs of Offshore Wind
- California City’s Green Building Ordinance Applies to Commercial Buildings
- Agilent To Save $3.5M Over 10 Years With Solar
- S. America Takes Most Urgent View of Copenhagen Talks
- Texas, China Wind Partners May Build U.S. Factory to Appease Critical Lawmaker
- Volvo, Mack Engines First to Meet 2010 EPA Emissions Standards
- Around the Web – Nike, Google, Nissan, Bush’s Green Library, WWF
- Fossil Fuel Emissions Rose 29% since 2000
- SEC Charges Four in ‘Green’ Investment Ponzi Scheme
- No Sunny Skies for Two Solar Projects in Texas, California
- Canada Delays GHG Emissions Regs, Russia Ups Emissions Cuts
- News Corp. Taps Hara for Energy Efficiency, Environmental Management
- Rising Sea Levels Would Hit U.S. East Coast Hardest
- Building an Energy-Efficient Data Center Using Virtualization Technology
- Trade Group on EPA Chemical Regs: ‘If Everything is a Priority, Then Nothing is a Priority’
- A/V Equipment Gets New Energy Star Requirements
- By Scaling Back Catalogs, JC Penney to Save 30% on Paper
- Around the Web – Starbucks, EcoFactor, UPS, Brownfields, Eco-Labels
- Subaru Touts Energy & Environmental Initiatives
- U.S., China Partner on Renewable Energy, Energy Efficiency
- Green Buildings Do Double Duty: Reduce Energy Use, Lower Financial Risk
- UK to Ease Rules for On-Site Renewable Energy Installations
- Intel Eyes Wind, Electric Cars
- Nike Tops Annual Climate Action Scores
- Iranian Tanker Firm to Cut Fuel Use 28%
- Corporate Jetsetters Can be Carbon Offsetters
- USPS Energy Use Down 9% From 2005 to 2008
- From Solar Applications to Christmas, LEDs Light the Night
- EPA May Regulate Sulfur Dioxide Emissions on Hourly Basis
- MITEI: Sustainable Energy & Terawatt-Scale Photovoltaics
- Around the Web – Health Care & Energy, Shell, NBC
Charts [ see all ]
Popular Topics
Energy Efficiency
Data Center
Emissions
Facilities
Electricity
Sustainability
Water
Supply Chain
Efficiency
Green Marketing
Strategy & Leadership
Research
Fleets & Transportation
Carbon Finance
Conventional Energy
Clean Energy
Waste & Recycling
Paper & Packaging
Policy & Law
Utilities
Construction
Comments and Discussions
Trade Association on Trade Group on EPA Chemical Regs: ‘If Everything is a Priority, Then Nothing is a Priority’
"Seriously… that..."
Gary Markowitz on Supermarkets Tackle Emissions Reductions, Fuel Efficiency
"Supermarkets waste over 10 percent of their energy through improper..."
peter in ireland on Ontario May Follow California’s Lead on TV Energy Efficiency
"Governor Schwarzenegger is shooting himself in the foot! 1...."
Environmental Leader on S. America Takes Most Urgent View of Copenhagen Talks
"The survey respondents (the PDF report mentions 4,000 respondents in 38..."
Jake on UPS Trying New Hydraulic Hybrid Trucks
"A point of clarification: the Reuters press release referenced herein reports that 20 UPS will purchase..."
Custom Organic Shirts on S. America Takes Most Urgent View of Copenhagen Talks
"90% of North Americans believe it is urgent to get a global climate..."
peter dublin on California City’s Green Building Ordinance Applies to Commercial Buildings
"Why energy efficiebnt regulation on buildings –..."




Reader Comments
This an excellent notice but the prices for the new savings lapms must to be cheaper due the adquisition level of the poor people don’t you think ?
Mr. Masaru Yamasaki | October 4th, 2007
Once again, the media, activists, and masses drive an absolute decision that doesn’t support all needs. I use CFLs when appropriate. But there are cases when incandescents are more appropriate and more energy efficient. Example, incandescents can be run at lower levels when lesser light levels are needed.
Johnson Bledge | October 22nd, 2007
There is no getting around the fact that a room is not adequately lit when you change to CFLs. This is especially important as all humans age and need more light to be able to do normal human tasks — such as read, sew, etc. In Industrial applications, CFLs in inspection areas will be a disaster
Marshall Bullard | October 22nd, 2007
Perhaps CFLs aren’t the best choice for all applications currently, but it’s reasonable to expect that the technology will continue to evolve. (eg. I see an ad at the top of this page for dimmable CFLs, created with a “new technology”). At the point that we must use CFLs to satisfy all our lighting needs, someone will almost certainly find a way to make them brighter, dimmer, bigger, smaller- whatever is required.
Catherine Caum | October 22nd, 2007
What plans are being made for the safe disposal of the CFLs? I hear that they contain small amounts of mercury. That could become a real problem with so many bulbs in use.
Luci Shaw | October 22nd, 2007
In the US, 48 Tons of Mercury are emitted from coal burning power plants every year (Wikipedia). This is the equivalent to the mercury in 8,708,973,600 CFL light bulbs (GE). In the US, that is 29 CFLs per person. Most CFL have a lifespan with a life span of 5 years or more. If we switch to CFL using 75% less energy than conventional light bulbs, we could greatly reduce the amount of mercury entering the environment.
For round numbers, imagine 48 Tons x 5 years x 0.75 = 180 Tons of mercury!
Safe disposal is a concern and most of the mercury can be recycled from the CFLs with the right programs. Call your congressman and support the appropriate legislation for regulation.
I find that CFLs tend to be too bright. If they have any downside, they take a minute to warm up. The lamps are cheaper in the long run but it certainly would help if they cheaper at the store.
Andy | October 24th, 2007