<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: China To Phase Out Incandescent Light Bulbs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.environmentalleader.com/2007/10/03/china-to-phase-out-incandescent-light-bulbs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.environmentalleader.com/2007/10/03/china-to-phase-out-incandescent-light-bulbs/</link>
	<description>The Executive's Daily Green Briefing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 21:16:51 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://www.environmentalleader.com/2007/10/03/china-to-phase-out-incandescent-light-bulbs/comment-page-1/#comment-17308</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 16:06:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.environmentalleader.com/2007/10/03/china-to-phase-out-incandescent-light-bulbs/#comment-17308</guid>
		<description>In the US, 48 Tons of Mercury are emitted from coal burning power plants every year (Wikipedia).  This is the equivalent to the mercury in 8,708,973,600 CFL light bulbs (GE).  In the US, that is 29 CFLs per person. Most CFL have a lifespan with a life span of 5 years or more.  If we switch to CFL using 75% less energy than conventional light bulbs, we could greatly reduce the amount of mercury entering the environment.  

For round numbers, imagine 48 Tons x 5 years x 0.75 = 180 Tons of mercury!

Safe disposal is a concern and most of the mercury can be recycled from the CFLs with the right programs.  Call your congressman and support the appropriate legislation for regulation.  

I find that CFLs tend to be too bright.  If they have any downside, they take a minute to warm up. The lamps are cheaper in the long run but it certainly would help if they cheaper at the store.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the US, 48 Tons of Mercury are emitted from coal burning power plants every year (Wikipedia).  This is the equivalent to the mercury in 8,708,973,600 CFL light bulbs (GE).  In the US, that is 29 CFLs per person. Most CFL have a lifespan with a life span of 5 years or more.  If we switch to CFL using 75% less energy than conventional light bulbs, we could greatly reduce the amount of mercury entering the environment.  </p>
<p>For round numbers, imagine 48 Tons x 5 years x 0.75 = 180 Tons of mercury!</p>
<p>Safe disposal is a concern and most of the mercury can be recycled from the CFLs with the right programs.  Call your congressman and support the appropriate legislation for regulation.  </p>
<p>I find that CFLs tend to be too bright.  If they have any downside, they take a minute to warm up. The lamps are cheaper in the long run but it certainly would help if they cheaper at the store.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luci Shaw</title>
		<link>http://www.environmentalleader.com/2007/10/03/china-to-phase-out-incandescent-light-bulbs/comment-page-1/#comment-17068</link>
		<dc:creator>Luci Shaw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 21:44:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.environmentalleader.com/2007/10/03/china-to-phase-out-incandescent-light-bulbs/#comment-17068</guid>
		<description>What plans are being made for the safe disposal of the CFLs? I hear that they contain small amounts of mercury. That could become a real problem with so many bulbs in use.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What plans are being made for the safe disposal of the CFLs? I hear that they contain small amounts of mercury. That could become a real problem with so many bulbs in use.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Catherine Caum</title>
		<link>http://www.environmentalleader.com/2007/10/03/china-to-phase-out-incandescent-light-bulbs/comment-page-1/#comment-17065</link>
		<dc:creator>Catherine Caum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 20:38:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.environmentalleader.com/2007/10/03/china-to-phase-out-incandescent-light-bulbs/#comment-17065</guid>
		<description>Perhaps CFLs aren&#039;t the best choice for all applications currently, but it&#039;s reasonable to expect that the technology will continue to evolve.  (eg. I see an ad at the top of this page for dimmable CFLs, created with a &quot;new technology&quot;).  At the point that we must use CFLs to satisfy all our lighting needs, someone will almost certainly find a way to make them brighter, dimmer, bigger, smaller- whatever is required.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps CFLs aren&#8217;t the best choice for all applications currently, but it&#8217;s reasonable to expect that the technology will continue to evolve.  (eg. I see an ad at the top of this page for dimmable CFLs, created with a &#8220;new technology&#8221;).  At the point that we must use CFLs to satisfy all our lighting needs, someone will almost certainly find a way to make them brighter, dimmer, bigger, smaller- whatever is required.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marshall Bullard</title>
		<link>http://www.environmentalleader.com/2007/10/03/china-to-phase-out-incandescent-light-bulbs/comment-page-1/#comment-17037</link>
		<dc:creator>Marshall Bullard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 14:39:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.environmentalleader.com/2007/10/03/china-to-phase-out-incandescent-light-bulbs/#comment-17037</guid>
		<description>There is no getting around the fact that a room is not adequately lit when you change to CFLs.  This is especially important as all humans age and need more light to be able to do normal human tasks -- such as read, sew, etc.  In Industrial applications, CFLs in inspection areas will be a disaster</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is no getting around the fact that a room is not adequately lit when you change to CFLs.  This is especially important as all humans age and need more light to be able to do normal human tasks &#8212; such as read, sew, etc.  In Industrial applications, CFLs in inspection areas will be a disaster</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johnson Bledge</title>
		<link>http://www.environmentalleader.com/2007/10/03/china-to-phase-out-incandescent-light-bulbs/comment-page-1/#comment-17035</link>
		<dc:creator>Johnson Bledge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 14:18:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.environmentalleader.com/2007/10/03/china-to-phase-out-incandescent-light-bulbs/#comment-17035</guid>
		<description>Once again, the media, activists, and masses drive an absolute decision that doesn&#039;t support all needs.  I use CFLs when appropriate.  But there are cases when incandescents are more appropriate and more energy efficient.  Example, incandescents can be run at lower levels when lesser light levels are needed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Once again, the media, activists, and masses drive an absolute decision that doesn&#8217;t support all needs.  I use CFLs when appropriate.  But there are cases when incandescents are more appropriate and more energy efficient.  Example, incandescents can be run at lower levels when lesser light levels are needed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr. Masaru Yamasaki</title>
		<link>http://www.environmentalleader.com/2007/10/03/china-to-phase-out-incandescent-light-bulbs/comment-page-1/#comment-14103</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr. Masaru Yamasaki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2007 15:13:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.environmentalleader.com/2007/10/03/china-to-phase-out-incandescent-light-bulbs/#comment-14103</guid>
		<description>This an excellent notice but the prices for the new savings lapms must to be cheaper due the adquisition level of the poor people don&#039;t you think ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This an excellent notice but the prices for the new savings lapms must to be cheaper due the adquisition level of the poor people don&#8217;t you think ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
