January 15, 2008
‘Beyond Petroleum’ Pays Off For BP
For seven years, British Petroleum has invested heavily in its “Beyond Petroleum” campaign which has been praised by business press and awards shows but criticized by skeptics as greenwashing. The success of the ongoing campaign has compelled Adweek to ask if advertising, as much as action, can change public perception.Though BP was the first oil company to acknowledge a link between energy use and global warming, the company lost its green credibility when it abruptly withdrew from the Global Climate Coalition, Adweek writes. So in 2000, after a 1998-merger with Amoco, BPAmoco invested heavily in its “Beyond Petroleum” campaign to reintroduce itself as a socially conscious company. That campaign, notes this article, was quite polarizing.
But it also seemed to work. Sales from 2004 to 2005 rose from $192 billion to $240 billion then to $266 billion in 2006. Moreover, a Landor Associates survey of consumers found that 21% of them thought BP was the greenest of oil companies, followed by Shell at 15% and Chevron at 13%. The campaign also won a 2007 gold Effie from the American Marketing Association. BP said that from 2000-2007, its brand awareness went from 4 percent to 67 percent.
But is the company greener? Critics claim BP has simply co-opted green language to distract the public, but even they admit to the ad campaign’s effectiveness. “BP is running a greenwashing campaign,” said John Stauber, founder of the Center for Media and Democracy, “and from a sales and marketing perspective, it is brilliant. They’ve positioned themselves where everyone wants to be today, especially oil companies.”
However, last November, a PFC Energy study claimed that in the area of climate change and reducing its greenhouse gases, “BP has indeed been more proactive than [competitors].” And BP was last year’s most accountable company according to Accountability Rating. Earlier in the year, BP had had a controversial showdown with officials in Chicago over the dumping of toxic waste and was fined heavily for environmental regulation violations.
Advertisers
Unclear about the EPA's new GHG Rule?
Learn how it could affect your business. >>
Sustainable Brands 2010, June 7-10, Monterey
Where the Sustainability & Brand & Design Communities Meet. >>
Pew Center Conference: Corporate Energy Efficiency
Reduce energy consumption, lower emissions and save money. >>
Recent Daily News [ see all ]
- 03/21/2010
- 03/18/2010
- 03/17/2010
- Environmental Mission Statements: A List of Hotel Sustainability Policies
- Las Vegas Sands Feeling Lucky With Eco 360 Initiative
- Roundup: Avon, Dow, Alcoa
- Strategies for Transparent Corporate Climate Policy Communications
- Navy, Army Push to Meet Renewable Energy Goals
- Whole Foods, Starbucks Top Sustainable Retail Design Awards
- EU’s Recycled Carbon Credit Crisis Torpedoes Market
- Los Angeles Airports Take Up ‘FastTrack’ Enterprise Carbon Accounting
- BNY Mellon Office Cuts Energy Use by 20%
- Senator Highlights Need for More Energy Efficient Products
- AT&T Moves to Reduce Consumer Paper Use, Electricity
- Post-Consumer Film Recycling Hit Record High in 2008
- Foodservice Supply Chain Addresses Facility Energy Efficiency
- Starbucks Sponsors Cup Design Contest to Reduce Waste
- Industrial Companies Tap into Waste Heat to Generate Electricity
- Roundup: Ted Turner, Sanyo, Campbell’s
- New Clean Jobs, Energy Independence Hinge on National RES Passage
- Cisco, Dell, HP Push Limits of Server Efficiency
- NY Injects $100M into Energy Efficiency Projects
- Lessons On Corporate Sustainability
- London’s Strata Tower Integrates 3 Wind Turbines into Facade
- Navy Selects ‘Green’ Mobile Wastewater Treatment System
Charts [ see all ]
Popular Topics
Energy Efficiency
Data Center
Emissions
Facilities
Electricity
Sustainability
Water
Supply Chain
Efficiency
Green Marketing
Strategy & Leadership
Research
Fleets & Transportation
Carbon Finance
Conventional Energy
Clean Energy
Waste & Recycling
Paper & Packaging
Policy & Law
Utilities
Construction
Comments and Discussions
Bean on U.S. Dairy Industry Plans 25% GHG Emissions Cut by 2020
"NO!!!!!!!!!!!! The meat industry will most likely remain the top contributor of green..."
Greg Schulman on Environmental Mission Statements: A List of Hotel Sustainability Policies
"Mission statements are just words on paper! Action..."
Bessault on SunPower Tops List of Best Solar Panel Manufacturers
"Dear Sir We are planning to build a small solar farm for a client. This farm will be..."
indra wiguna on Sharp Announces Free E-Recycling Program
"We are an Indonesian company we recycle from paper product pvc waste and electronic waste..."
Jim on EPA Launches Hydraulic Fracturing Study
"I am sure none of you that are opposed to energy industries actually use any. Instead of investing your..."
Allen Brown on New Dasani Bottle Made Partially of Plant Material
"Score for coca cola co on the Ad for new plant bottle 1) actual plant bottle C+..."
Bob Pojasek on Environmental Mission Statements: A List of Hotel Sustainability Policies
"Great posting, Matt. It would be interesting to follow up..."





Reader Comments
Adweek needs to be more careful with its research. BP would not have lost any green credentials when leaving the Global Climate Coalition. On the contrary this group was one of the foremost detractors of the IPCC and the science around climate change. BP enhanced it’s position by leaving the group, which eventually folded. Here is an extract from Wikipedia…The Global Climate Coalition was a group of mainly United States businesses opposing immediate action to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. The group formed in 1989 as a response to several reports from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. A major scientific report on the severity of global warming by the IPCC in 2001 led to large-scale membership loss.[citation needed] Since 2002 the GCC has been dormant, or in its own words, “deactivated”.
Sarah Severn | January 23rd, 2008