January 22, 2008

Cruise Ships Worse For Environment Than Planes

Bookmark and Share Email this story Print this post Add your comments

Cruise ships emit three times more CO2 than airplanes, reports the Telegraph. In its annual report, Carnival, which comprises 11 cruise lines, said it emits 401 grams of CO2 per passenger, which this article claims is 36 times greater than the per passenger emission of Eurostar and more than three times that for a Boeing 747 passenger. The Passenger Shipping Association said that a ferry, on average, releases 120 grams of CO2 per passenger.

But Bill Gibbons, director of PSA, said, “The cruise ship also uses energy for laundry, restaurants, theater” and other things more than mere transport whereas “a lot of CO2 emissions involved in flying-from food preparation to waste treatment-aren’t counted in airlines’ figures.”

But Justin Francis of Responsibletravel.com, a group that offers a directory that minimizes environmental damage, said, “Some cruises involve a flight to the departure destination, something of a double carbon whammy.” In addition, Our Planet magazine says that a cruise ship passenger accounts for 3.5 kilograms of trash daily, compared to 0.8 kilograms generated by local people on shore.

Cruise ships contend they are working hard to lessen their environmental impact. Royal Caribbean said it had installed advanced water purification systems on board and smokeless gas-turbine engines and that it also burns bio-fuel when available.

Bookmark and Share Email this story Print this post Add your comments

Advertisers

Join the Discussion

Reader Comments

Suddenly taking that summer cruise seems even more likely. If not to relax, just to piss off the environmentalists who would rather see us driving horse and buggy and living in huts.

No, but thanks to us, you can now go suck an organic, free-range egg……

401 grams per passenger… per day? per cruise? A cruise lasts about 2 weeks, and it’s not just to GET to your vacation, it IS the vacation. You can’t compare it to ferries or air travel for God’s sake! However, if it is per day, it’s surprisingly much. If you believe CO2 is dangerous that is…

Get EL Daily in your inbox, subscribe to free newsletter

Recent Daily News [ see all ]

  • 02/09/2010
  • 02/08/2010
  • 02/05/2010

Recent Jobs

Post a Job
Jobs powered by Simply Hired

Comments and Discussions

John Bergdoll on Accidental to Purposeful Sustainability: Using What You Already Have to Grow Sustainability
"I was following the logic your article..."

Liz Amason on Clorox Comes Clean With Chemical Content on Web Site
"But look at their ingredients listings. For example, their regular liquid bleach..."

Rigidflexibility on Companies Going Green Should Ignore Green Consumer
"I was about to market a metal working fluid that is 98>% Soybean oil and..."

Stuart on Canadian Environment Minister Denounces Quebec Vehicle Emissions Regs
"Canadians have been waiting for the feds to act on climate change for..."

Steve Wolford on Sports Teams Embrace Sustainability
"Hello Environmental Leader, We just returned from the National Sport Forum in Baltimore. Team and..."

Mauibrad on Bipartisan Senatorial Effort Seeks Cap and Trade for non-CO2 Emissions
"Finally some enlightened ideas out of Congress!"

Cameron Green on Data Centers Can Apply for Energy Star Rating in June
"I did a blog post about this. Essentially PUE doesn’t give you very much..."