January 28, 2008
Register Now For Green Sustainable Efficiency World 2008!
Reflecting back on 2007, one industry clearly stands out as having benefited big time from the growing interest in sustainability: the conference industry. It seems like every week has offered at least one, and often more, chances to attend a brand new sustainability, efficiency or environmental conference of some kind.
The obvious question is whether or not sustainability conferences are, themselves, sustainable. Do they justify the environmental cost of the event and travel? But as I was recently sitting on stage with vice presidents from four other Fortune 500 companies, looking out at an audience of less than 25, I had to ask myself if the personal and time costs were justified as well.
I believe these conferences have played two important roles in the last year. First, they helped raise awareness, or more importantly, an educated awareness of the situation and the challenges ahead. Second, they helped companies get started by discussing key points (economic benefits, organizational interest, example projects that worked, etc.).
Together, I believe these roles have helped pave the way for a surge in corporate environmental efforts in the U.S. (just read Environmental Leader every day for evidence of the surge).
But my recent on-stage experience, comments from others, and general progress lead me to believe that these roles aren’t enough to justify so many events in 2008. To stay relevant, I think two things need to happen.
First, we need more real-world experiences that others can learn from. For example, in which regions do solar projects make sense today? What are effective tools for employee engagement? How do we incent greener behavior in the purchasing department?
Second, we need less marketing. At conferences, companies tend to present in ways which put them in a good light, but tell me little about what to do at Sun. Believe me – I’ll think more highly of you and your company if you share a concrete idea, than if you waste a half hour of my life telling me how wonderful you are. I blame the speakers for this, but the conference folks also need to step up.
All this raises a bigger question: How many general purpose sustainability conferences do we really need? Is this really a long-term, stand-alone topic, or are the really important discussions going to happen at the finance conference and the supply chain conference and the investor conference and the IT conference?
Time will tell, but as sustainability moves deeper into the day-to-day activities of each company, this is where the real innovation has to happen.
Dave Douglas is Vice President of Eco Responsibility at Sun Microsystems
Advertisers
Make sustainability part of your strategy.
Get equipped at the SAP Sustainability Resource Center. >>
Unclear about the EPA's new GHG Rule?
Learn how it could affect your business. >>
EPA mandatory emissions reporting starts Jan 1st
CSA Standards can help your organization get ready for compliance. Find out how. >>
Product Environmental Compliance Best Practices
How to achieve compliance at a significantly lower cost. Download the full report. >>
Join the Discussion
Recent Daily News [ see all ]
- 11/20/2009
- 11/19/2009
- 11/18/2009
- Ontario May Follow California’s Lead on TV Energy Efficiency
- EPA Is One Step Closer to New Ship Emissions Standards
- European Paper Industry Cuts CO2 Emissions by 42% since 1990
- CDP Launches Water Disclosure Project
- Whirlpool Cuts Water Use by Nearly 22% from 2004 to 2008
- National Grid Again Rejects High Costs of Offshore Wind
- California City’s Green Building Ordinance Applies to Commercial Buildings
- Agilent To Save $3.5M Over 10 Years With Solar
- S. America Takes Most Urgent View of Copenhagen Talks
- Texas, China Wind Partners May Build U.S. Factory to Appease Critical Lawmaker
- Volvo, Mack Engines First to Meet 2010 EPA Emissions Standards
- Around the Web – Nike, Google, Nissan, Bush’s Green Library, WWF
- Fossil Fuel Emissions Rose 29% since 2000
- SEC Charges Four in ‘Green’ Investment Ponzi Scheme
- No Sunny Skies for Two Solar Projects in Texas, California
- Canada Delays GHG Emissions Regs, Russia Ups Emissions Cuts
- News Corp. Taps Hara for Energy Efficiency, Environmental Management
- Rising Sea Levels Would Hit U.S. East Coast Hardest
- Building an Energy-Efficient Data Center Using Virtualization Technology
- Trade Group on EPA Chemical Regs: ‘If Everything is a Priority, Then Nothing is a Priority’
- A/V Equipment Gets New Energy Star Requirements
- By Scaling Back Catalogs, JC Penney to Save 30% on Paper
- Around the Web – Starbucks, EcoFactor, UPS, Brownfields, Eco-Labels
- Subaru Touts Energy & Environmental Initiatives
- U.S., China Partner on Renewable Energy, Energy Efficiency
- Green Buildings Do Double Duty: Reduce Energy Use, Lower Financial Risk
- UK to Ease Rules for On-Site Renewable Energy Installations
- Intel Eyes Wind, Electric Cars
- Nike Tops Annual Climate Action Scores
- Iranian Tanker Firm to Cut Fuel Use 28%
- Corporate Jetsetters Can be Carbon Offsetters
- USPS Energy Use Down 9% From 2005 to 2008
- From Solar Applications to Christmas, LEDs Light the Night
- EPA May Regulate Sulfur Dioxide Emissions on Hourly Basis
- MITEI: Sustainable Energy & Terawatt-Scale Photovoltaics
- Around the Web – Health Care & Energy, Shell, NBC
Charts [ see all ]
Popular Topics
Energy Efficiency
Data Center
Emissions
Facilities
Electricity
Sustainability
Water
Supply Chain
Efficiency
Green Marketing
Strategy & Leadership
Research
Fleets & Transportation
Carbon Finance
Conventional Energy
Clean Energy
Waste & Recycling
Paper & Packaging
Policy & Law
Utilities
Construction
Comments and Discussions
Trade Association on Trade Group on EPA Chemical Regs: ‘If Everything is a Priority, Then Nothing is a Priority’
"Seriously… that..."
Gary Markowitz on Supermarkets Tackle Emissions Reductions, Fuel Efficiency
"Supermarkets waste over 10 percent of their energy through improper..."
peter in ireland on Ontario May Follow California’s Lead on TV Energy Efficiency
"Governor Schwarzenegger is shooting himself in the foot! 1...."
Environmental Leader on S. America Takes Most Urgent View of Copenhagen Talks
"The survey respondents (the PDF report mentions 4,000 respondents in 38..."
Jake on UPS Trying New Hydraulic Hybrid Trucks
"A point of clarification: the Reuters press release referenced herein reports that 20 UPS will purchase..."
Custom Organic Shirts on S. America Takes Most Urgent View of Copenhagen Talks
"90% of North Americans believe it is urgent to get a global climate..."
peter dublin on California City’s Green Building Ordinance Applies to Commercial Buildings
"Why energy efficiebnt regulation on buildings –..."




Reader Comments
Dave,
Great article!You are right about the sharing, I learn so much from my suppliers. This is one initiative where sharing is contagious.
Thomas Siodlak | January 29th, 2008
Dave’s comments are right on the money. The sustainability agenda faces potential market backlash from over exposure and under delivery on promises. We each must act on the best interest of our companies as well as the participating industries (there are many from consumer products to industrial “rust belt” all the way to the high-tech and bio-tech), government agencies, and social agenda organizations to bring forward logical strategies with concrete actionable practices that make a quantifiable and verifiable difference today. Not a list of can, should, will, maybe, if, projected, etc.
Dave – you have my support. I’ll gladly put forward a short demonstrable list of recommendations to take to a select few conferences with you.
JP
Jack Pouchet | January 29th, 2008
Excellent stuff.
This can apply to media tours as well. If you’re touting sustainable products, perhaps getting on several planes and sitting in towncars visiting press & analysts isn’t the most environmentally-friendly practice in the world. Would a phone call, video conference or WebEx presentation suffice?
Matt Heinz | January 29th, 2008
I cannot get over how many name badges you have there. Was this all from one year? If so, how many of these conferences actually were beneficial to attend. I attended 3 environmental conferences last year (Greenbuild, the Conference Board and CraigMichaels) and while the first 2 provided some good information, nothing came close to CraigMichaels conference because it had none of the promotional presentations that kill these conferences.
Can anybody else recommend conferences that are worth the time out of the office…not to mention the carbon!
Guy Chandling | January 29th, 2008
I couldnt agree more…way too many events and you have to search to find ones that are truly worth it.
Charles Gold | January 29th, 2008
Thanks for the feedback. Yes, those were all badges, most of them from 2007 (the full picture has more). I spoke at many of them and didn’t attend the whole thing. Overall I probably attended a piece of over 20 conferences.
Regarding what conferences are best to go to, I don’t think my track record is better than anyone else’s. The one thing I will say is that I’ve had better luck at meetings that were run by groups that I already found good affinity in (in my case EPA Climate Leaders would be a good example).
David Douglas | January 29th, 2008
Timely article. As Manufacturing Sector Leader for a environmental consulting firm, we are currently reviewing conference opportunities to identify those we think will be of value to us and our clients. I was overwhelmed by the list of potential conferences provided by my staff. So, what conferences should we attend to keep on the forefront of sustainability and its inter-relationship to climate change, energy efficiency and fiscal responsibility?
Donald Walsh | January 30th, 2008