February 22, 2008
GM’s Bob Lutz: Global Warming Is A ‘Crock Of Shit’
During a closed-door session with reporters in January, Bob Lutz, General Motors’ vice chairman, said that global warming is a “total crock of shit,” dmagazine.com reports (via BusinessGreen). Then he added: “I’m a skeptic, not a denier.”
GM PR executive Dee Allen was on hand. Unfortunately, we don’t know what might have gone through her mind at that moment. Allen later said that Lutz’s comment was a personal opinion, rather than a reflection of GM’s values.
Lutz also said that hybrid cars like those made by Toyota “make no economic sense,” because their price will never come down, and diesel autos like those touted by Chrysler are also uneconomic.
Lutz has overseen an increased focus on the development of low carbon vehicles at GM, BusinessGreen reports.
Yesterday, on GM’s Fast Lane blog, Lutz responded to the criticism his words have raised in a blog post titled “Talk About a Crock…”
“An offhand comment I made recently about the concept of global warming seems to have a lot of people heated, and it’s spreading through the Internet like ragweed,” Lutz wrote. “But I think that the people making big deal out of it are missing the real point. My beliefs are mine and I have a right to them, just as you have a right to yours. But among my strongest beliefs is that my job is to do what makes the most business sense for GM. Never mind what I said, or the context in which I said it. My thoughts on what has or hasn’t been the cause of climate change have nothing to do with the decisions I make to advance the cause of General Motors. ”
Lutz might be focusing on the wrong part of the story. What’s most interesting here is his seeming surprise that when GM’s vice chairman tells a group of reporters that global warming is a crock of shit, people are going to talk about it.
Advertisers
Enhance Sustainability. Improve Profitability.
Learn how at the SAP Sustainability Resource Center. >>
Unclear about the EPA's new GHG Rule?
Learn how it could affect your business. >>
EPA mandatory emissions reporting starts Jan 1st
CSA Standards can help your organization get ready for compliance. Find out how. >>
Product Environmental Compliance Best Practices
How to achieve compliance at a significantly lower cost. Download the full report. >>
Join the Discussion
Recent Daily News [ see all ]
- 11/20/2009
- 11/19/2009
- 11/18/2009
- Ontario May Follow California’s Lead on TV Energy Efficiency
- EPA Is One Step Closer to New Ship Emissions Standards
- European Paper Industry Cuts CO2 Emissions by 42% since 1990
- CDP Launches Water Disclosure Project
- Whirlpool Cuts Water Use by Nearly 22% from 2004 to 2008
- National Grid Again Rejects High Costs of Offshore Wind
- California City’s Green Building Ordinance Applies to Commercial Buildings
- Agilent To Save $3.5M Over 10 Years With Solar
- S. America Takes Most Urgent View of Copenhagen Talks
- Texas, China Wind Partners May Build U.S. Factory to Appease Critical Lawmaker
- Volvo, Mack Engines First to Meet 2010 EPA Emissions Standards
- Around the Web – Nike, Google, Nissan, Bush’s Green Library, WWF
- Fossil Fuel Emissions Rose 29% since 2000
- SEC Charges Four in ‘Green’ Investment Ponzi Scheme
- No Sunny Skies for Two Solar Projects in Texas, California
- Canada Delays GHG Emissions Regs, Russia Ups Emissions Cuts
- News Corp. Taps Hara for Energy Efficiency, Environmental Management
- Rising Sea Levels Would Hit U.S. East Coast Hardest
- Building an Energy-Efficient Data Center Using Virtualization Technology
- Trade Group on EPA Chemical Regs: ‘If Everything is a Priority, Then Nothing is a Priority’
- A/V Equipment Gets New Energy Star Requirements
- By Scaling Back Catalogs, JC Penney to Save 30% on Paper
- Around the Web – Starbucks, EcoFactor, UPS, Brownfields, Eco-Labels
- Subaru Touts Energy & Environmental Initiatives
- U.S., China Partner on Renewable Energy, Energy Efficiency
- Green Buildings Do Double Duty: Reduce Energy Use, Lower Financial Risk
- UK to Ease Rules for On-Site Renewable Energy Installations
- Intel Eyes Wind, Electric Cars
- Nike Tops Annual Climate Action Scores
- Iranian Tanker Firm to Cut Fuel Use 28%
- Corporate Jetsetters Can be Carbon Offsetters
- USPS Energy Use Down 9% From 2005 to 2008
- From Solar Applications to Christmas, LEDs Light the Night
- EPA May Regulate Sulfur Dioxide Emissions on Hourly Basis
- MITEI: Sustainable Energy & Terawatt-Scale Photovoltaics
- Around the Web – Health Care & Energy, Shell, NBC
Charts [ see all ]
Popular Topics
Energy Efficiency
Data Center
Emissions
Facilities
Electricity
Sustainability
Water
Supply Chain
Efficiency
Green Marketing
Strategy & Leadership
Research
Fleets & Transportation
Carbon Finance
Conventional Energy
Clean Energy
Waste & Recycling
Paper & Packaging
Policy & Law
Utilities
Construction
Comments and Discussions
Environmental Leader on S. America Takes Most Urgent View of Copenhagen Talks
"The survey respondents (the PDF report mentions 4,000 respondents in 38..."
Jake on UPS Trying New Hydraulic Hybrid Trucks
"A point of clarification: the Reuters press release referenced herein reports that 20 UPS will purchase..."
Custom Organic Shirts on S. America Takes Most Urgent View of Copenhagen Talks
"90% of North Americans believe it is urgent to get a global climate..."
peter dublin on California City’s Green Building Ordinance Applies to Commercial Buildings
"Why energy efficiebnt regulation on buildings –..."
JEONG CHUN PHUOC on EU Poised to Give Heavy Industry Free Carbon Permits
"“Competitive Intelligence in Environmenting : A Holistic Deal for..."
Philip Vandenberg on Building an Energy-Efficient Data Center Using Virtualization Technology
"Rob has implemented many best practices for data centres..."
George Hoguet on Rising Sea Levels Would Hit U.S. East Coast Hardest
"Want to add some pressure into the system? Check out the Facebook group -NO TV..."





Reader Comments
Global Warming is no longer a topic of debate or “opionion” – it is scientific fact per the consensus of scientific experts. So is naive at best, and downright irresponsile for industry leaders like Mr. Lutz to deny it and call it a “crock of sh**” ! Hope he realizes how stupid this is – since expressing an “opinion” about Global warming is like expressing an “opinion” that the world is flat or that the sun goes around the earth. We know who or what is full of sh** !
Ron | February 22nd, 2008
Well Ron, ya gots the facts backwards.It is not a proven theory,and is still only opinions on both sides of the table.
I do think you are trying,like so many others,to stiffle the rights of free speach by deniying opposing partys to express thier opinions .
And why,oh why, do “your kind” always bring up those old sayings–the world is flat,the sun revolves around the earth?????
It’s the same thing as you saying,God will punish you,you are going to hell. To this I say,,–”Only according to YOUR God”.
BTW, Have you flown ib an airplane around the world, and witnessed the roundness of the earth,or are you just voiceing your “opinion” of what others have told you.Have you traveled into space and observed the earth circumnavigating the sun,or are you takeing someone elses’ word for it.
Have you witnessed this glowbull warming,or are you takeing it as gospel,according to those who would profit from it.
Paid for opinions are just so so.Which way it learns toward will depend on which side paid for that opinion.
I honestly believe Mr. Lutz has nailed it with his true feelings and honest opinion on the matter.
Sign me-Citizen Joe
Tom–Thomas E. Harley,Sr
Thomas E, Harley,Sr. | February 22nd, 2008
Ron,
Years ago, it was considered a scientific fact “per the consensus of scientific experts” that the world was flat. Anyone expressing doubts regarding that was dismissed as being “stupid” by the sheep who were so willing to be led by the “experts.”
Will | February 23rd, 2008
The problem with global warming skeptics is that they trumpet that global warming is a crock of shit before they can prove it isn’t.
Jay | February 24th, 2008
I meant “before they can prove it is”. All scientific theories are assumed to be falsifiable, however, if a majority of scientists accept the theory, than the theory stands until it can be proven false. The analogy of the Flat Earth theory is a poor one because someone actually proved it false. The skeptics of Global Warming haven’t proved that it is false, they just trumpet that it is a crock of shit before they have proved anything.
Jay | February 24th, 2008
The American Petroleum Institute has already put a lot of money into think tanks to keep trying to bolster a skeptical stance toward global warming regardless of whether the science behind global warming is sound. Just shows how Global Warming skeptics are a crock of shit most of the time.
http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=American_Petroleum_Institute
Jay | February 24th, 2008
Thank GOD some one had the guts to point out “The emperor has no clothes.” I have survived a great many “coming disasters” in the last sixty years, but none as baseless and silly as “Global Warming.”
Pat Bratton | February 24th, 2008
Mr. Lutz: You are correct! The “global warming” panic is a fraud. See http://www.oism.org/pproject/GWReview_OISM300.pdf for an excellent treatment of the subject by knowledgeable climate scientists. This paper has over 130 references, and is sound.
“Carbon” legislation and other measures to reduce CO2 concentration will have no measurable effect on climate, because the human-caused content is miniscule, compared to natural phenomena. And CO2 is a minor greenhouse gas.
Alarmists’ computer models fall far short of accurately representing the complex climate. Therefore their predictions are flawed. How can people believe these dire predictions of global disaster years in the future, when forecasters can’t even tell us what the weather will be in the next few hours?
You are to be admired for stating your correct opinion. More corporate leaders need to come forth too.
Reducing our dependence on foreign oil, and taking steps to develop advanced technology vehicles are good things. Being good stewards of our planet is also a good thing. But doing these things in the name of “reducing global warming” is ludicrous.
James Boomer | February 24th, 2008
This seems to follow GM’s trend towards demise. Regardless of one’s opinion of Global Warming, it is almost impossible to argue against our hugh dependency on fossil fuels. Mr. Lutz will soon be out of business as many of us will be driving hybrids, alternative fuel vehicles, or taking mass transit. Goodby GM!
Laura Bourg | February 25th, 2008
Lutz should resign.
Pablo | February 25th, 2008
If I were a stockholder of GM, I would not be very happy. A person in this position is deciding policy for the company and it is naive to think that personal opinions don’t influence corporate strategic decisions. His statement here alienates many of the customers who GM is courting with their own hybrids, Chevy Volt etc. Customers have and do pay a premium for these products. It’s a little ironic for these customers to pay this premium to a company whose top executive (in essence) insults them for paying this premium.
Frank | February 25th, 2008
One more reason never to purchase a crock of ^&*% GM product.
Nick | February 25th, 2008
It’s these ignorant, old school, brain farters that run the American economy and keep us behind the rest of the world when it comes to the next wave of business akin to the Industrial Revolution; the Sustainability Revolution.
This man deserves to lose his position.
Jorge | February 25th, 2008
Global Warming is no longer a topic of debate or “opionion” – it is scientific fact per the consensus of scientific experts. So is naive at best, and downright irresponsile for industry leaders like Mr. Lutz to deny it and call it a “crock of sh**” !
Ha, global average temperature has been dropping NOT increasing look it up…. Every since the last el nino the average temperature has dropped , yes its very little but the point is its dropping NOT going up..HA what a joke, there has also been a cooling trend since 1975 how is that? CO2 has only been increasing but the average temp is NOT go up up up hmmmmmm…
Jay | February 25th, 2008
To any skeptics of global warming: http://www.ipcc.ch/ Please take the time to do some research. I am a 19 year old college student. I’ve taken a class in environmental studies and a class in the sustainable use of water. I’m majoring in natural resource management and alternative energy technology. what i’ve learned is that this country very irresponsibly uses natural resources, which in turn negatively impacts our environment. the general idea is that if we abuse the planet, we alter it’s condition. we are causing the earth system to respond directly by creating an inhospititable environment for humans as well as many other species. i am not a “greenie”, hippie, or tree-hugger, but i do understand what we’re doing to our planet. it is imperative that people take the time to understand why people like Mr. Lutz need to be corrected. Out of curiousity, how many people reviewed the blog following Mr. Lutz’s response to the media outbust on his comment? did it seem extremely biased to anyone else? …interesting how GM might take that course of action in an attempt to redeem their standing with American people.
Nate Damon | February 26th, 2008
First of all, Most people in this discussion don’t even know how to spell things correctly, let alone bring plausible arguments to the table. Secondly, anyone who has a decent scientific background, like myself, would know that global warming is indeed taking place. If one doesn’t have a basic understanding of the workings of the environment and the chemistry of the atmosphere, they should watch the “Discovery Science Channel” once in a while. This channel offers hard visual and factual evidence about many theories, including global warning.
Cristen | February 26th, 2008
It’s official. The winter of 2007-2008 now ranks as the coldest since 1966! Oh my Gosh….the climate changes! Sure am glad we have so many informed individuals like Al Gore to help point this out.
Will | March 3rd, 2008
Global AVERAGE temperature is dropping only because of the disruption of jet stream flows and heat carrying, and cold water transporting ocean currants. The average temperatues in some locations are dropping due to the effects of the fore-stated circumstances, which are attributed directly to human causes which include, but are not limited to, carbon dioxide, sulfur oxides, and nitrous oxides emissions. The heating of the Earth causes patterns of weather to go awry in many ways, from some areas cooling, to some heating, relative to the disturbance of currants such as ” Hadley Cells.” Read up some time, and get some scientific evidence befor you make un-backed remarks. As a sixth-year Civil/Environmental Engineer, I have grounds for argument.
Cristen | April 27th, 2008
I neglected to mention that the oceans absorb most of the thermal energy. Air loses thermal energy quickly, whereas water, having a high specific heat(the ability to absorb large amounts of energy w/out a huge change in temp, and the ability to store the energy, responsible for cooler coastal summers, and warmer winters), holds on to it. Ocean water has gone up about 2 degrees F in the past decade or so. This difference sounds marginal, but it makes a tremendous impact on climate, as well as ocean life. Even a fraction of a degree temperature fluctuation can inhibit spawning of ocean creatures. Also, a fraction of a degree can change patterns of currants in the air and water. This changes temperatures in particular areas. For instance, if a region received a warm air current all year long, despite being located far from the equator, they would have a relatively mild climate. One minute change in the direction of this currant, or a colder currant being redirected to the area, could completely change the weather system.
Cristen | May 9th, 2008
I totally agree. The earth has been cooling for the last 5 years, and yet that does NOT make the news anywhere. How is it that only one side makes the news??? Also with all these new restrictions can anyone really ask why we are in the finacial situation that we are in??????? At some point in time the american population is going to have to stand up and say this is “A CROCK OF SHIT” oh by the way i know that my post will problly not stay arround long because I am telling the TRUTH so please make some noise if you agree……
brian | January 13th, 2009