March 17, 2008
Consumers Ready To Kiss Convenience Packaging Goodbye

More than half of U.S. consumers would give up all forms of packaging provided for convenience purposes if it would benefit the environment, including: packaging designed for easy stacking/storing at home (58 percent); packaging that can be used for cooking, or doubling as a re-sealable container (55 percent); and packaging designed for easy transport (53 percent). U.S. consumers are slightly more likely to give up packaging for convenience purposes than the average global consumer, according to research from Nielsen.
At the other end of the scale, Nielsen finds that U.S. consumers are least willing to give up packaging designed to keep products clean and untouched by other shoppers (26 percent); packaging designed to keep products in good condition (31 percent); packaging that preserves products to make them last longer and stay fresher (31 percent); and packaging information, including food labeling, cooking and usage instructions (33 percent). One in ten U.S. consumers is not prepared to give up any aspect of packaging for the benefit of the environment.
“As global concern and awareness for the environment continues to grow, consumers worldwide are demanding more action from retailers and consumer packaged goods manufacturers to protect the environment,” said Shuchi Sethi, vice president, Nielsen Customized Research. “While eco-friendly packaging might not be the top priority for shoppers today, it’s certainly a growing priority the food industry cannot ignore.”
Nielsen’s research uncovers some differences regarding attitudes toward packaging between different regions of the world. Generally, Europeans and North Americans agree on types of packaging they are willing to forego to help the environment with nearly 60 percent willing to give up packaging designed for stacking and storing at home. By comparison, only 42 percent of Asians would be willing to give up these types of convenience packaging, likely because Asian homes tend to be smaller and have limited storage space so “stack and store” options are more practical and preferable.
Environmentally-aware New Zealanders top global rankings as the nation most prepared to give up all packaging aspects for the sake of the environment. This may be due to high levels of ‘eco-consciousness’, including in-store reminders and recyclable bag merchandising by supermarkets.
“In more eco-aware markets, including the U.S., there is an increasing expectation of packaging with minimal environmental impact, although for most consumers, this doesn’t necessarily translate into a willingness to pay more,” said Sethi. “What most consumers expect is packaging that provides an added ‘feel eco-good factor’ by minimizing environmental impacts.”
According to Nielsen’s PanelViews study of 65,000 U.S. households:
- More than half of U.S. consumers claim to recycle cans, bottles and/or newspapers all the time, with 20 percent doing so “most of the time.”
- Roughly 40 percent of consumers will sometimes think to look for products with less packaging.
- Nearly 80 percent of consumers make a point of combining shopping trips to save gas most, if not all of the time.
- Sixty percent of consumers buy used or refurbished products to reduce waste and materials consumption at least some of the time.
- Nearly 60 percent make an effort to buy fruits and vegetables at a local farmers’ market.
- Approximately two-thirds turn down their thermostats to conserve fuel most or all of the time.
Advertisers
Make sustainability part of your strategy.
Get equipped at the SAP Sustainability Resource Center. >>
Unclear about the EPA's new GHG Rule?
Learn how it could affect your business. >>
EPA mandatory emissions reporting starts Jan 1st
CSA Standards can help your organization get ready for compliance. Find out how. >>
Survey Results: Product Environmental Compliance Best Practices
How to achieve compliance at a significantly lower cost. Download the full report. >>
Join the Discussion
Recent Daily News [ see all ]
- 11/24/2009
- 11/23/2009
- 11/20/2009
- U.S. Solar Demand Prompts Domestic Production
- Sobeys Aims to Reduce GHG Emissions 15% by 2013
- Government Intervention Required to Drive “Green” Technology
- NREL: State Incentives Crucial to Renewable Energy Growth
- Australia Considers E-Waste Law
- Artic Expedition Investigates Climate Change, Alternative Fuel
- Construction Effluent Rule May Cost $1B Annually
- Germany, UK Ramp Up Solar Efforts
- 62% of Firms Assign Environmental Team for Green Goals
- McD’s in Germany Trades Red for Green In Logo
- Around the Web – Climate Risk, GHG Reporting, Al Gore, U.S. Chamber
- NY Acura Dealer Adds Solar
- Obama May Set Provisional GHG Reduction Targets at Copenhagen
- Climate Scientists Alleged to Have Manipulated Data
- Wind Power Investments Grow in North America
- Sanyo Selling Solar Eco-homes
- WWF, WRI Make Last-Minute Pitches on Climate Change
- CH2M Hill Cuts Paper Use by 21% from 2006 to 2008
- Kraft Rolls Up 50M Miles Saved Through Transportation Efficiency
- Construction Firm Adding Wind, Solar to Demonstrate Possibilities to Customers
- Retrofitted Exit Signs Can Save Up to 90% in Energy Costs
- Electronics Boom, E-Cycling Lags
- Around the Web – Genan, CO Ski Resorts, Sainsbury, MillerCoors
- Replenish Energy Wins Cleantech Open Expo’s Global Ideas Award
- Ontario May Follow California’s Lead on TV Energy Efficiency
- EPA Is One Step Closer to New Ship Emissions Standards
- European Paper Industry Cuts CO2 Emissions by 42% since 1990
- CDP Launches Water Disclosure Project
- Whirlpool Cuts Water Use by Nearly 22% from 2004 to 2008
- National Grid Again Rejects High Costs of Offshore Wind
- California City’s Green Building Ordinance Applies to Commercial Buildings
- Agilent To Save $3.5M Over 10 Years With Solar
- S. America Takes Most Urgent View of Copenhagen Talks
- Texas, China Wind Partners May Build U.S. Factory to Appease Critical Lawmaker
- Volvo, Mack Engines First to Meet 2010 EPA Emissions Standards
- Around the Web – Nike, Google, Nissan, Bush’s Green Library, WWF
Charts [ see all ]
Popular Topics
Energy Efficiency
Data Center
Emissions
Facilities
Electricity
Sustainability
Water
Supply Chain
Efficiency
Green Marketing
Strategy & Leadership
Research
Fleets & Transportation
Carbon Finance
Conventional Energy
Clean Energy
Waste & Recycling
Paper & Packaging
Policy & Law
Utilities
Construction
Comments and Discussions
Phil on Climate Scientists Alleged to Have Manipulated Data
"After reading all the comments it seems obvious, to me, that the individuals populating..."
Meme Mine on WWF, WRI Make Last-Minute Pitches on Climate Change
"To the voting public, what the scientists say is irrelevant anymore for if you read..."
john on Electronics Boom, E-Cycling Lags
"When we fail to get the word out about e-cycling, we fail our consumers and our industry- I second..."
Btok on Canada Delays GHG Emissions Regs, Russia Ups Emissions Cuts
"http://www.infowars.com/dr-tim -ball-on-the-significance-o..."
ruffie on Wind Power Investments Grow in North America
"Anyone with any knowledge of the energy business in Canada knows that the majority of smart..."
Rod Johnson on Stimulus Package Delivers $2.4 Billion for Electric Vehicle Projects
"Will this stimulus be extended to other electric utility vehicles?"
Charli on Trade Group on EPA Chemical Regs: ‘If Everything is a Priority, Then Nothing is a Priority’
"Thanks Environmental Leader, for..."




Reader Comments
This highlights the challenge that many companies, even those who genuinely want to make changes for the “greener”, face: that their ability to make meaningful changes is limited by consumers’ willingness to accept those changes. I recently heard a presentation about the carbon footprint of pet food from the manufacturer’s perspective. It concluded that the vast majority of the environmental impact comes from the ingredients (agriculture) and consumption (purchase, use, and disposal), and without consumer willingness to accept changes in these areas there is little that the company can do to lower the overall impact of the product’s lifecycle. This rule extends far beyond pet foods of course. A follow on conclusion, supported by Nielsen’s findings, is that far more market research needs to be done by companies to understand exactly what changes – whether they be in packaging, ingredients, or otherwise – will be acceptable and even successful in the marketplace.
Kent Ragen
Founder & CEO
http://www.ecounit.com
Kent Ragen | March 18th, 2008