<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Consumers Ready To Kiss Convenience Packaging Goodbye</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.environmentalleader.com/2008/03/17/consumers-ready-to-kiss-convenience-packaging-goodbye/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.environmentalleader.com/2008/03/17/consumers-ready-to-kiss-convenience-packaging-goodbye/</link>
	<description>The Executive's Daily Green Briefing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 04:35:28 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kent Ragen</title>
		<link>http://www.environmentalleader.com/2008/03/17/consumers-ready-to-kiss-convenience-packaging-goodbye/comment-page-1/#comment-43043</link>
		<dc:creator>Kent Ragen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 23:18:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.environmentalleader.com/2008/03/17/consumers-ready-to-kiss-convenience-packaging-goodbye/#comment-43043</guid>
		<description>This highlights the challenge that many companies, even those who genuinely want to make changes for the &quot;greener&quot;, face: that their ability to make meaningful changes is limited by consumers&#039; willingness to accept those changes.  I recently heard a presentation about the carbon footprint of pet food from the manufacturer&#039;s perspective. It concluded that the vast majority of the environmental impact comes from the ingredients (agriculture) and consumption (purchase, use, and disposal), and without consumer willingness to accept changes in these areas there is little that the company can do to lower the overall impact of the product&#039;s lifecycle.  This rule extends far beyond pet foods of course. A follow on conclusion, supported by Nielsen&#039;s findings, is that far more market research needs to be done by companies to understand exactly what changes - whether they be in packaging, ingredients, or otherwise - will be acceptable and even successful in the marketplace.  
Kent Ragen
Founder &amp; CEO
www.ecounit.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This highlights the challenge that many companies, even those who genuinely want to make changes for the &#8220;greener&#8221;, face: that their ability to make meaningful changes is limited by consumers&#8217; willingness to accept those changes.  I recently heard a presentation about the carbon footprint of pet food from the manufacturer&#8217;s perspective. It concluded that the vast majority of the environmental impact comes from the ingredients (agriculture) and consumption (purchase, use, and disposal), and without consumer willingness to accept changes in these areas there is little that the company can do to lower the overall impact of the product&#8217;s lifecycle.  This rule extends far beyond pet foods of course. A follow on conclusion, supported by Nielsen&#8217;s findings, is that far more market research needs to be done by companies to understand exactly what changes &#8211; whether they be in packaging, ingredients, or otherwise &#8211; will be acceptable and even successful in the marketplace.<br />
Kent Ragen<br />
Founder &amp; CEO<br />
<a href="http://www.ecounit.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.ecounit.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
