What a biased piece of reportage. You guys just do not get it. The Supreme Court required the EPA to add carbon dioxide to the Clean Air Act over one year ago. This is not a political issue, as these two WSJ reporters insist, but rather a means to avoid serious, massive, irreversible problems. Energy superstitions, indeed.
Comments
What a biased piece of reportage. You guys just do not get it. The Supreme Court required the EPA to add carbon dioxide to the Clean Air Act over one year ago. This is not a political issue, as these two WSJ reporters insist, but rather a means to avoid serious, massive, irreversible problems. Energy superstitions, indeed.
Jack Miller April 16th, 2008