Related topics:
Recommend this:
At Yahoo! headquarters, we recently installed an interactive touch screen next to our corporate cafeteria. The Green Screen, as we fondly call it, tracks our electricity consumption by building over time. Employees can compare one building against another and translate it into kilowatt-hours, dollars, or (for those who want something more tangible) laptop-hours or compact florescent lightbulb-hours.
We don’t expect that this gadget will drastically cut our energy consumption - our campus is already quite efficient - but we do hope it will educate people, and tap into the power of information to change behavior.
You understand this phenomenon if you know any hybrid Prius owners - most of them have become obsessive (and competitive) about their miles per gallon, which is displayed prominently on their dashboard panels. Just listen to them talk to one another: “I got forty.” “I got forty-five driving in the city.” “I average fifty.” Meanwhile, with oil over $100 a barrel and gas prices approaching four dollars a gallon, non-hybrid drivers are beginning to alter their habits for financial reasons.
I’m hoping that we can cultivate a similar level of competitive bean-counting on Yahoo!s campus: “Building A beat building D today.” Engineers are notoriously competitive when it comes to numbers. With electricity rates in California among the highest in the country, the simple act of making electricity consumption visible can make a huge difference.
On a larger level, that’s part of what Yahoo! accomplishes in our commitment to be carbon neutral. We measure, and offset, our carbon footprint - all of our air travel, all of our employee commuting, all of our facilities around the globe. Once we have a number associated with our environmental impact, we have something measurable to work against. And, through our offset purchases, we associate a price with that number. When the head of facilities in London calls me and tells me that only five employees out of an office of hundreds drive to work on a regular basis, I can tell them what that translates to in terms of carbon, and direct savings to Yahoo!.
Last year, for Earth Week, co-founders Jerry Yang and David Filo issued a challenge to Yahoo! employees - reduce your collective energy consumption by twenty percent for the week, and we will sumo wrestle on the grass lawn. More employees carpooled. They eliminated meat from their diets. They used less papers and turned lights off earlier. They turned into obsessive bean counters in pursuit of a common goal. And they were rewarded for success in a uniquely Yahoo! manner.
If you can measure it, you can manage it. And make a positive impact while doing it.
CUTTING COMPLIANCE COSTS-CAN YOU AFFORD NOT TO?
Implement a cost effective compliance management program. Find out how. >>
ENTERPRISE EHS COMPLIANCE SOLUTION
Globally manage EHS initiatives - locally execute compliance programs. >>
In a study of consumer opinions of marketing claims, survey respondents identified most ...
click to view full size chart »
For most organizations today, sophisticated carbon management is simply not possible. At best, ... continue »
Comments
Finally, sumo wrestling gets the respect it deserves! On a more curious note, a question for Christina — who do you report into at Yahoo? What sort of energy planning does Yahoo undertake and how are you involved?
Roy Kaufmann May 1st, 2008What a fun way to get employees involved! A reminder to everyone that creativity and competition bring powerful results. Congrats.
Vickie Jenkins May 1st, 2008A great way to incentivise work colleagues to reduce their environmental footprint, although I am not sure whether all CEO’s would be up for it!
Paul Hinds June 16th, 2008I would pick up though on two issues:
1. have Jerry and David made a commitment to reduce their environmental footprint over the coming year, and are staff able to monitor their success via the intranet?
2. it seems a bit of a paradox that you are paying into a carbon offset scheme when it appears there is more you can do to reduce your overall carbon footprint. I appreciate that staff made much of the savings from their personal lives, but there must of been a significant proportion from Yahoo! activities? If there is more leverage there, then use it, rather than paying you way out of responsibility to reduce your carbon footprint.