Consumers Want Brands To Solve Climate Crisis

May 13, 2008

Consumers are calling on brands to take responsibility for reducing the impact of climate change as governments fail to make progress, according to research by Havas Media.

Email this story Print this post Add your comments

Consumers are calling on brands to take responsibility for reducing the impact of climate change as governments fail to make progress, according to research by Havas Media.

In two-thirds of the markets researched (UK, US, Mexico, Brazil, Germany and France) people felt more strongly that companies and their brands should be finding solutions compared to the government.

The research paints a picture of a world that has given up on its elected leaders’ abilities to combat the problem, with only 11 percent of all respondents agreeing strongly that their governments are doing enough to arrest climate change.

This leadership vacuum presents an opportunity for companies and their brands to step in and take a wider role in addressing climate change. All markets express a clear desire to see more ecologically responsible brands and believe multinationals can, and should, make a positive impact on the issue. Consumers, however, are still very confused about the issue of climate change and look to brands for clearer communication on the issue.

Consumers are becoming increasingly aware of who is credibly making changes and who is not, despite green stereotypes associated with different sectors. The result: green marketing strategies and good environmental practices are no longer a “nice to have” for brands, but increasingly a “must have” in terms of not only maintaining brand image but also in maintaining market share.

Consumers will pay a premium

The survey stated that 79% of consumers said they would rather buy from companies doing their best to reduce their impact on the environment. Further, 89% are likely to buy more green goods in the next 12 months and 35% are willing to pay a premium for those goods. When it comes to actually buying green, 80% of our respondents said they would buy more if more were on offer. The report concludes that companies should not make the mistake of confusing loyalty with a lack of consumer choice.

Branding strategies and sectors – definitions become more complex

The survey suggests consumer awareness of the damage done by particular companies and sectors is growing increasingly sophisticated, and that companies which fail to act responsibly can no longer expect to hide behind generally positive perceptions of the sector in which they operate.

For example, some brands within banking – which, as a sector, is ranked more environmentally correct than the oil and fuel industries – were considered less environmentally friendly than some of the more proactive oil and fuel brands.
And yet there are also clear incentives for companies in less environmentally-respected industries to improve their performance. The strongest-performing brands in the energy sector were considered more environmentally virtuous than those in relatively neutral sectors, which are perceived to have done little ecological damage, such as media and finance.

The report defines this phenomenon as “sector stretch” – as consumers become more educated in green matters, they are beginning to distinguish between companies without resorting to sector stereotypes. This is great news for brands that communicate legitimate abatement strategies and less good for those who have not yet made a start on mending their ways, as their ability to borrow credibility from more proactive peers slips away.

Email this story Print this post Add your comments

Advertisers

Stay competitive through sustainability.

Find out how at the SAP Sustainability Resource Center. >>

Unclear about the EPA's new GHG Rule?

Learn how it could affect your business. >>

EPA mandatory emissions reporting starts Jan 1st

CSA Standards can help your organization get ready for compliance. Find out how. >>

Best Practices: Product Environmental Compliance

How to achieve compliance at a significantly lower cost. Download the full report. >>

Join the Discussion

Reader Comments

Your graph and narrative are a bit confusing. The graph paints a picture of 38% feeling “strongly” that governments are doing a good job, while the narrative states that only 11% feel their governments are doing enough. No, not exactly the same statistic, but it would have been better to display the data for the latter as that was what was mentioned in the text.

Tepchai Houlimpong | May 14th, 2008

Recent Daily News [ see all ]

11/25/2009
11/24/2009
11/23/2009

Tour of Sustainable Facilities at Univeristy of Arizona

Charts [ see all ]

Government Intervention Required to Drive “Green” Technology

62% of Firms Assign Environmental Team for Green Goals

European Paper Industry Cuts CO2 Emissions by 42% since 1990

S. America Takes Most Urgent View of Copenhagen Talks

Jobs

View All Jobs >> Post a Job >>

Comments and Discussions

Jetset1 on Energy-Savings Claims Don’t Add Up for Microsoft’s Windows 7
"This article is wrong. If your PC is less than a few years old,..."

Iain on McD’s in Germany Trades Red for Green In Logo
"Now if only their food was healthy and nutritious."

Phil on Climate Scientists Alleged to Have Manipulated Data
"After reading all the comments it seems obvious, to me, that the individuals populating..."

Marc Hudson on McD’s in Germany Trades Red for Green In Logo
"where will the stone be mined from- under what labor rights conditions? Will the..."

Clyde on Climate Scientists Alleged to Have Manipulated Data
"This just shows all the Global Warming freaks out there are a bunch of criminals cut from..."

Car Rental Singapore on News Corp. Taps Hara for Energy Efficiency, Environmental Management
"Energy reduction is a good thing. We need to save the..."

Meme Mine on WWF, WRI Make Last-Minute Pitches on Climate Change
"To the voting public, what the scientists say is irrelevant anymore for if you read..."

Environmental Leader