May 20, 2008
AIA Evaluates Green Building Rating Systems
The American Institute of Architects has released a study of three of the most widely used green building rating systems (Green Globes, SBTool 07, and LEED NC 2.2) (via Environmental NewsBits).
The report finds Green Globes lacking when it comes to certifying a project, needing more stringent and specific requirements in the areas of energy reduction and operational performance. The U.S. Green Building Council’s LEED NC 2.2 system is good example of a rating system that provides a measurement of environmental achievement, according to the report. And the International Initiative for a Sustainable Built Environment’s SBTool 07 would be stronger if there were more “required” items vs. those that are simply “encouraged” and required project documentation.
The study assesses the effectiveness of the rating systems in supporting the goals of the AIA sustainability position statement with an emphasis on energy conservation improvements. The AIA has a goal of carbon neutrality in buildings by 2030.
Click here (PDF) for AIA position statement on green rating systems.
The aim of the analysis is to show the public and the building industry the role the three most popular rating systems play in the AIA’s ultimate goal of carbon neutrality in buildings by 2030.
Last month AIA named its top ten sustainable building designs.
Advertisers
Stay competitive through sustainability.
Find out how at the SAP Sustainability Resource Center. >>
EFFECTIVELY MANAGE WATER COMPLIANCE
Understand how increased enforcement may affect your company. Find out more >>
EPA mandatory emissions reporting starts Jan 1st
CSA Standards can help your organization get ready for compliance. Find out how. >>
Join the Discussion
Recent Daily News [ see all ]
- 11/06/2009
- 11/05/2009
- 11/04/2009
- Emissions Intensity Falling Globally
- JohnsonDiversey Ups GHG Reduction Target to 25%
- Sainsbury’s Offers Free London Electric Car Charging
- Carbon Trading Could Trigger a ‘Sub-prime Style’ Economic Crash
- Peabody, Exxon Accused of Undermining Climate Talks
- BMW, Toyota, Ford Tout Eco-cars
- In ‘Apathy Gap,’ Energy Efficiency at Home Ranks Low
- China Pushes for CO2 Storage, Not Emissions Reductions
- Clean Tech VC Funding On Rebound, Up 50% Since 2nd Quarter
- IECC Building Code Recommendations Add Up to 30% in Energy Efficiency Gains
- Disney Buys $7M in Reforestation Offsets, a Corporate Record
- McKesson to Save $300K Via Fuel-Efficient Vehicles
- Sprint to Save $2.1M With Eco-Friendly Packaging
- U.S. Export-Import Bank Adopts Carbon Policy to Support Renewable Energy
- Greening the Automotive Supply Chain
- Yokohama Rubber Cuts GHG Emissions 13.4% in 2008
- Electronics Industry Lawsuit Called ‘Attack on States’ Rights’
- Wal-Mart Adding LEDs to 650 Stores
- One Committee Down for Senate Climate Bill, Five More to Go
- EU Poised to Give Heavy Industry Free Carbon Permits
- ResponsibleTravel.com Scuttles Carbon Offsetting Option
- U.S. Cap-and-Trade Creates Winners and Losers among Largest Emitters
- DOE Awards $155M to Make Industrial Sector More Energy Efficient
- System Upgrades Power Up Energy Savings for Hotels
- Xerox Cuts GHG Emissions by 20% from 2002
- Waste Management Landfill Gas Project Complete
- Intel, Pepsi, Kohl’s Stay Atop Green Power Partnership list
- Wal-Mart Thinks Big With Smaller Stores
- Despite Critics, Gore ‘Proud’ to Invest in Green Firms
- Metal Recyclers Spar Over Ship Recycling Site
Industry Voices [ see all ]
A Roadmap for a Renewable Energy Partnership
Brad Cashaw
Vice President
Quaker Foods and Snacks Supply Chain and Sustainability
Forest Carbon Core to Climate Change Deal
Chris Elliott
Forest Carbon Initiative Lead
World Wildlife Fund
VCS and CarbonFix Tops in Review of Forestry Carbon Standards
Paulo Lopes
Carbon Management Consultant
Carbon Clear







Reader Comments
Thanks to AIA for unbiased assessment of so called “Building Green” associations that are amazingly lacking in knowledge of actual construction procedures and materials used. In my 31st year in the construction business, mostly custom home construction, I have strived to build consumers homes with the most efficient and newest designed components available. With the advent of trussed floors and roofs, truss joists, “Superior” tm. insulated foundation walls, osb, and new subfloor and roofing materials, it is much easier to accomplish this goal. For the past 20 years our crews have “Built Green” in many ways that NAHB, Leeds, Energy Star, and others have yet to become aware of, such as insulated exterior corners, intersecting wall tees, and headers. Cantilevered roof trusses and cantilevered ceiling joist and rafter construction has been our standard construction for 20 years. In the recent Building Green movement The Advanced Wall and Ceiling guide seems to be the preferred method adopted by DOE, Energy Star and all others. In a recent seminar on this method over 60 of most prominent builders in Chattanooga area, as well as myself, attended. Very few builders were familiar with these construction techniques, and the presentation described the ups and downs of this Advanced Framing that these Associations want contractors to adopt. The end product of these designs were acceptably much more energy efficient than the methods used by 99% of these builders, however, the added expense of these methods in both time, labor and overall slowdown of framing, inspection failures, and most of all, added labor and expense of using 5/8″ drywall and drywall clips on all inside corners, makes the “Advanced Framing” method one that very few experienced builders would ever consider. In my opinion this method is less structurally sound, primitive in design, cost and labor prohibitive. and not likely to lead us to a totally insulated structure that will conserve energy and resources. in numerous communications and conversations with DOE officials, NAHB, LEEDS, ORNL, TVA, Energy Star, Building Code Inspectors, all men and women in charge of researching, testing, evaluations, and ultimately in charge of assisting the development of new designs and components I have yet to find anyone who is actually familiar with construction procedures and components. No one knows what an insulated corner, tee, header, cantilevered roof design, and other components we have designed over the years. These designs will greatly increase the efficiency of our homes, leading to energy savings, savings in construction time, cost, labor, and the use large dimensional lumber. I have had little response from any one in these associations and agencies. I would like to find someone who is truly interested in conserving energy that will assist me in bringing these designs to market. I especially need assistance in testing and accreditation as just how much more energy efficient these designs will be. They are tried and proven designs we have used with great success and appreciation of homeowners. I would be glad to send drawings, pictures, and information. Looking forward to your response. Lynn Edwards
Lynn Edwards | June 1st, 2008