<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: S.F. Bay Area Passes Carbon Tax</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.environmentalleader.com/2008/05/22/sf-bay-area-passes-carbon-tax/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.environmentalleader.com/2008/05/22/sf-bay-area-passes-carbon-tax/</link>
	<description>Environmental Leader</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 13:10:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charlie Peters</title>
		<link>http://www.environmentalleader.com/2008/05/22/sf-bay-area-passes-carbon-tax/comment-page-1/#comment-472785</link>
		<dc:creator>Charlie Peters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2012 04:51:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.environmentalleader.com/2008/05/22/sf-bay-area-passes-carbon-tax/#comment-472785</guid>
		<description>Federal ethanol policy increases Government motors oil use and Big oil profit.

It is reported that today California is using Brazil sugar cane ethanol at $0.16 per gal increase over using GMO corn fuel ethanol. In this game the cars and trucks get to pay and Big oil profits are the result that may be ready for change.

We do NOT support AB 523 or SB 1396 unless the ethanol mandate is changed to voluntary ethanol in our gas.

Folks that pay more at the pump for less from Cars, trucks, food, water &amp; air need better, it is time.

The car tax of AB 118 Nunez is just a simple Big oil welfare program, AAA questioned the policy and some folks still agree.

AB 523 &amp; SB 1326 are just a short put (waiver) from better results.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Federal ethanol policy increases Government motors oil use and Big oil profit.</p>
<p>It is reported that today California is using Brazil sugar cane ethanol at $0.16 per gal increase over using GMO corn fuel ethanol. In this game the cars and trucks get to pay and Big oil profits are the result that may be ready for change.</p>
<p>We do NOT support AB 523 or SB 1396 unless the ethanol mandate is changed to voluntary ethanol in our gas.</p>
<p>Folks that pay more at the pump for less from Cars, trucks, food, water &amp; air need better, it is time.</p>
<p>The car tax of AB 118 Nunez is just a simple Big oil welfare program, AAA questioned the policy and some folks still agree.</p>
<p>AB 523 &amp; SB 1326 are just a short put (waiver) from better results.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charlie Peters</title>
		<link>http://www.environmentalleader.com/2008/05/22/sf-bay-area-passes-carbon-tax/comment-page-1/#comment-194069</link>
		<dc:creator>Charlie Peters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Apr 2010 16:24:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.environmentalleader.com/2008/05/22/sf-bay-area-passes-carbon-tax/#comment-194069</guid>
		<description>NO on AB 2289 (Eng) unless amended

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

CBS5 TV’s Jeffrey Schaub reports: “30% of the cars in California are over 12 years old but they account for 75% of state’s pollution.” CBS video with Tom Cackette of CARB talking about the smog check program

http://cbs5.com/local/smog.check.study.2.1468806.html

http://cbs5.com/video/?id=61255

http://cbs5.com/video/?id=62263@kpix.dayport.com

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

If an elected official would request a copy of the Sierra Research SR 2007-04-01 report and all communication about the report from CCEEB, CED, CARB, DCA/BAR, IMRC, Parsons, SGS Testcom &amp; Sierra Research it might help improve performance of Smog Check…. “Sherry Mehl.  The report has been modified since 2001. Continually”

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TvB3em82Lkw

 

 

Charlie Peters, Clean Air Performance Professionals, March 22, 2010 … CAPP contact: Charlie Peters (510) 537-1796 cappcharlie [at] earthlink.net …


www.indybay.org/newsitems/2010/04/18/18645036.php

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A random ‘Smog Check’ inspection &amp; repair &#039;secret shopper&#039; audit, ethanol cap and elimination of dual fuel CAFE credit can cut California car impact over 50% in 2010. (Prevent Over 2000 tons per day of sulfur, PM, HC, O3, NOx, CO &amp; CO2.) Improved performance of AB32 at reduced cost. (support H.R. 1207)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NO on AB 2289 (Eng) unless amended</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;</p>
<p>CBS5 TV’s Jeffrey Schaub reports: “30% of the cars in California are over 12 years old but they account for 75% of state’s pollution.” CBS video with Tom Cackette of CARB talking about the smog check program</p>
<p><a href="http://cbs5.com/local/smog.check.study.2.1468806.html" rel="nofollow">http://cbs5.com/local/smog.check.study.2.1468806.html</a></p>
<p><a href="http://cbs5.com/video/?id=61255" rel="nofollow">http://cbs5.com/video/?id=61255</a></p>
<p><a href="http://cbs5.com/video/?id=62263@kpix.dayport.com" rel="nofollow">http://cbs5.com/video/?id=62263@kpix.dayport.com</a></p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;</p>
<p>If an elected official would request a copy of the Sierra Research SR 2007-04-01 report and all communication about the report from CCEEB, CED, CARB, DCA/BAR, IMRC, Parsons, SGS Testcom &amp; Sierra Research it might help improve performance of Smog Check…. “Sherry Mehl.  The report has been modified since 2001. Continually”</p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TvB3em82Lkw" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TvB3em82Lkw</a></p>
<p>Charlie Peters, Clean Air Performance Professionals, March 22, 2010 … CAPP contact: Charlie Peters (510) 537-1796 cappcharlie [at] earthlink.net …</p>
<p><a href="http://www.indybay.org/newsitems/2010/04/18/18645036.php" rel="nofollow">http://www.indybay.org/newsitems/2010/04/18/18645036.php</a></p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;</p>
<p>A random ‘Smog Check’ inspection &amp; repair &#8216;secret shopper&#8217; audit, ethanol cap and elimination of dual fuel CAFE credit can cut California car impact over 50% in 2010. (Prevent Over 2000 tons per day of sulfur, PM, HC, O3, NOx, CO &amp; CO2.) Improved performance of AB32 at reduced cost. (support H.R. 1207)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: B Madsen</title>
		<link>http://www.environmentalleader.com/2008/05/22/sf-bay-area-passes-carbon-tax/comment-page-1/#comment-56862</link>
		<dc:creator>B Madsen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 15:00:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.environmentalleader.com/2008/05/22/sf-bay-area-passes-carbon-tax/#comment-56862</guid>
		<description>...and do what with the fees?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;and do what with the fees?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charlie Peters</title>
		<link>http://www.environmentalleader.com/2008/05/22/sf-bay-area-passes-carbon-tax/comment-page-1/#comment-55541</link>
		<dc:creator>Charlie Peters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 20:25:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.environmentalleader.com/2008/05/22/sf-bay-area-passes-carbon-tax/#comment-55541</guid>
		<description>Should Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger consider a &quot;fee&quot; on corn fuel ethanol use?  * Lower price for food, gas, water, beer, cleaner air… and… funds for the budget from oil profit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Should Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger consider a &#8220;fee&#8221; on corn fuel ethanol use?  * Lower price for food, gas, water, beer, cleaner air… and… funds for the budget from oil profit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glennis</title>
		<link>http://www.environmentalleader.com/2008/05/22/sf-bay-area-passes-carbon-tax/comment-page-1/#comment-55326</link>
		<dc:creator>Glennis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 13:24:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.environmentalleader.com/2008/05/22/sf-bay-area-passes-carbon-tax/#comment-55326</guid>
		<description>So to encourage power companies and refineries to clean up their acts, so to speak, they gouge them so that they don&#039;t have that money to use in developing cleaner technologies.  Very clever, San Francisco.  I can hear the screams now when they have another power crisis and the cost of oil goes up again.  Do these people not have a brain among them?  Everyone wants clean air, but rational thought would better serve the cause than the typical knee jerk reactions of the greener-than-thou SF council.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So to encourage power companies and refineries to clean up their acts, so to speak, they gouge them so that they don&#8217;t have that money to use in developing cleaner technologies.  Very clever, San Francisco.  I can hear the screams now when they have another power crisis and the cost of oil goes up again.  Do these people not have a brain among them?  Everyone wants clean air, but rational thought would better serve the cause than the typical knee jerk reactions of the greener-than-thou SF council.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carlie Peters</title>
		<link>http://www.environmentalleader.com/2008/05/22/sf-bay-area-passes-carbon-tax/comment-page-1/#comment-55249</link>
		<dc:creator>Carlie Peters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 02:13:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.environmentalleader.com/2008/05/22/sf-bay-area-passes-carbon-tax/#comment-55249</guid>
		<description>Carbon tax for corporate and NGO welfare?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Carbon tax for corporate and NGO welfare?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

