May 31, 2008

Cement Industry In Demand V. Emissions Battle

Bookmark and Share Email this story Print this post Add your comments

Cement plants have become more automated, integrated and efficient since Henry Kaiser founded the Kaiser Cement Corporation — now known as Hanson Permanente Cement — in 1939 in the hills above Cupertino, California.

But the 11 cement plants in California churn out the stuff in largely the same way they have for many decades — an issue that has earned the attention of a Climate Action Team subgroup.

The group, comprised of environmentalists, industry representatives, and state agencies such as the Air Resources Board, is working on plans to implement AB32, passed in 2006 to mandate a statewide reduction in greenhouse gas emissions to 1990 levels by 2020, MercuryNews.com reports.

Cement plants are looking at different fuel sources and the Bay Area Air Quality Management District has granted the Hanson plant a permit to increase its use of petroleum coke to heat its kiln from eight tons per hour to 20 tons per hour. Pet coke is a byproduct of petroleum production and is high in sulphur and low in volatile content, according to Wikipedia.

One factor in the new fuel’s sustainability factor is that its source is a refinery in the Bay Area, while the coal the plant uses is transported from states such as Utah, but some say it may not be the best solution.

While its high-heat and low-ash content make pet coke a good fuel for power generation in coal fired boilers, it poses some environmental and technical problems with its combustion. In order to meet current North American emissions standards, some form of sulphur capture is required.

Interim results of an 18-month trial burning a blend of coal and petroleum coke at Drax Power Station in the U.K. in 2006, showed no adverse impact on the local environment, the company said.

Cement manufacturers are also working towards more environmental end products.

U.S. Concrete has said that it’s implementing environmental technologies that will reduce potential carbon dioxide emissions by hundreds of thousands of tons annually.

Bookmark and Share Email this story Print this post Add your comments

Advertisers

Join the Discussion

Reader Comments

This article appears to be about “carbon footprint” related to fossil fuel emissions. But what about particulates, are these adequately controlled? That seems to be an ongoing issue in relation to cement manufacturing in other countries, and particulates have recently been getting a great deal of negative press related to health effects when they are inhaled.

Get EL Daily in your inbox, subscribe to free newsletter

Recent Daily News [ see all ]

  • 11/20/2009
  • 11/19/2009
  • 11/18/2009

Recent Jobs

Post a Job
Jobs powered by Simply Hired

Comments and Discussions

Gary Markowitz on Supermarkets Tackle Emissions Reductions, Fuel Efficiency
"Supermarkets waste over 10 percent of their energy through improper..."

peter in ireland on Ontario May Follow California’s Lead on TV Energy Efficiency
"Governor Schwarzenegger is shooting himself in the foot! 1...."

Environmental Leader on S. America Takes Most Urgent View of Copenhagen Talks
"The survey respondents (the PDF report mentions 4,000 respondents in 38..."

Jake on UPS Trying New Hydraulic Hybrid Trucks
"A point of clarification: the Reuters press release referenced herein reports that 20 UPS will purchase..."

Custom Organic Shirts on S. America Takes Most Urgent View of Copenhagen Talks
"90% of North Americans believe it is urgent to get a global climate..."

peter dublin on California City’s Green Building Ordinance Applies to Commercial Buildings
"Why energy efficiebnt regulation on buildings –..."