Consumers Tap Whole Foods, Burt’s Bees, Trader Joe’s As Top Green Brands

June 3, 2008

Email this story Print this post Add your comments

A survey, conducted in the US and the UK, indicates the environment has taken a back seat to the economy for more than 75 percent of Americans and 66 percent of Britons.

The 2008 ImagePower Green Brands Survey, conducted jointly by Landor Associates, Cohn & Wolfe, and Penn, Schoen & Berland, also indicates that two out of three Americans think the environment is in worse shape than it was five years ago, and that lower income consumers have greater concern for the direction of the environment than wealthier consumers. Despite economic considerations, however, consumers are still willing to pay more for green products.

Consumers in both countries identify themselves as having the biggest impact on the environment. Americans list industry as having had the poorest record of environmental protection, while in the UK, government received the most blame.

Additional findings indicate that despite the abundance of “green” marketing in the last 12 months, consumers still view baseline activities, such as recycling, to be the most powerful contribution to environmental improvement. Further, though 95 percent of consumers think too much packaging is used on consumer goods, only 38 percent include packaging criteria in purchase decision.

Similar to the 2007 ImagePower findings, U.S. consumers believe Body Care and Grocery to be the “greenest” product categories, while Travel and Energy remain at the bottom of the list. One of the most significant differences between the 2008 and 2007 findings is the shift in thinking about the most pressing environmental concerns. In 2007, most consumers were concerned about global warming, and this year’s survey shows that energy and resource issues have increased in importance.

In order to gauge which brands are communicating their green initiatives or values most effectively, the survey asked participants in each country to rank their greenest brands, respectively. The results (see chart above) provide a mix of brands across categories; in the U.S., personal care products make up most of the top 10, while in the U.K. supermarkets do the same.

In addition, 67% of American consumers and 69% of Britons think we are in worse environmental shape now than we were five years ago. In the U.S., industry is still seen as the most responsible for the problem, though British consumers now point to their own behavior as having the greatest impact.

Also, the environment is no longer viewed as a grassroots concern: 36 percent of Americans believe it should be up to the government to implement policies and standards to advance environmental change.

Email this story Print this post Add your comments

Advertisers

Make sustainability part of your strategy.

Get equipped at the SAP Sustainability Resource Center. >>

Unclear about the EPA's new GHG Rule?

Learn how it could affect your business. >>

EPA mandatory emissions reporting starts Jan 1st

CSA Standards can help your organization get ready for compliance. Find out how. >>

Product Environmental Compliance Best Practices

How to achieve compliance at a significantly lower cost. Download the full report. >>

Join the Discussion

Reader Comments

I shop at Trader Joe’s frequently and like the prices and selection, but they have a heck of a lot of environmentally unfriendly packaging even for their store brand.

PJD | June 4th, 2008

I will bet *The Body Shop* won’t be in next year’s Top Ten Green Companies, since L’Oreal now owns it.

MissMelissa | June 12th, 2008

How can Burt’s bees be on the list, they were baught out by Did they keep all the ingredients the same or trying to mislead consumers with the name?

Amie | June 14th, 2008

How can Burt’s bees be on the list, they were bought out by Clorox? Did they keep all the ingredients the same or trying to mislead consumers with the name?

Amie | June 14th, 2008

I want to know why method is labeled green – maybe greener than clorox but for a company that advertises ‘plants not chemical plants’ – why is half their ingredient list chemicals.

cheryl | June 14th, 2008

Method has been fooling everyone for a while…and successfully as well. They have so many opportunities to be green that they do not take. People closer to the source have told me they do not practice what they preach at all. And yes, their products are not all natural. Just another example of fooling people with nice packaging.

persimmon | June 30th, 2008

Recent Daily News [ see all ]

11/24/2009
11/23/2009
11/20/2009

Charts [ see all ]

Government Intervention Required to Drive “Green” Technology

62% of Firms Assign Environmental Team for Green Goals

European Paper Industry Cuts CO2 Emissions by 42% since 1990

S. America Takes Most Urgent View of Copenhagen Talks

Jobs

View All Jobs >> Post a Job >>

Comments and Discussions

Jetset1 on Energy-Savings Claims Don’t Add Up for Microsoft’s Windows 7
"This article is wrong. If your PC is less than a few years old,..."

Iain on McD’s in Germany Trades Red for Green In Logo
"Now if only their food was healthy and nutritious."

Phil on Climate Scientists Alleged to Have Manipulated Data
"After reading all the comments it seems obvious, to me, that the individuals populating..."

Marc Hudson on McD’s in Germany Trades Red for Green In Logo
"where will the stone be mined from- under what labor rights conditions? Will the..."

Clyde on Climate Scientists Alleged to Have Manipulated Data
"This just shows all the Global Warming freaks out there are a bunch of criminals cut from..."

Car Rental Singapore on News Corp. Taps Hara for Energy Efficiency, Environmental Management
"Energy reduction is a good thing. We need to save the..."

Meme Mine on WWF, WRI Make Last-Minute Pitches on Climate Change
"To the voting public, what the scientists say is irrelevant anymore for if you read..."

Environmental Leader