June 12, 2008
50% Of Businesses Lack Sustainability Strategy
One-half of businesses recently polled lack a sustainability strategy. Those with a strategy are more likely to be focused on improving perceptions and responding to increasing regulations, rather than meeting social needs or generating revenue opportunities.
CEOs made up the majority of respondents to the survey, developed by The Vandiver Group and sponsored by PR firm Pinnacle Worldwide, and although less than half have a strategy today, 55 percent said sustainability will grow in importance and require increased resources and attention.
The results also show that companies are more focused on perception (7.1 on a 10-point scale) than revenue growth (rated 6 on the same scale). Meanwhile, companies rated reducing consumption and increasing pollution control as more important (7.1 and 6.6 out of 10, respectively) than meeting social needs (5.28 out of 10 points) as drivers of their sustainability strategies.
The study found that nearly one-third of businesses are developing a sustainability strategy, and just less than one-half already have an existing strategy. Six percent of respondents characterized their company as a “recognized leader” in sustainability. The survey found that larger companies were slightly more likely than smaller companies to have strategies and staff dedicated to the area of sustainability. An overwhelming 75 percent of respondents said sustainability is either “an important part of our organization’s corporate strategy,” or said they expect the topic “to become increasingly important in the future.”
Other findings include:
• CEOs were reported to be the primary drivers of sustainability decisions, with communications and public affairs managers rarely in that role.
• More than 65 percent of companies do not have dedicated sustainability staff. Of those with dedicated staff; nearly half have fewer than five employees working more than half of their time on sustainability.
• “Improving perception of the company” was rated as more important than increasing revenue via sustainability programs. However, revenue was still seen as “somewhat important.”
• Nearly half of companies surveyed have less than $50,000 allocated annually to sustainability-related programs. Ten percent have more than $50,000 allocated, and 3 percent have more than $500,000 allocated.
•
Advertisers
Stay competitive through sustainability.
Find out how at the SAP Sustainability Resource Center. >>
EFFECTIVELY MANAGE WATER COMPLIANCE
Understand how increased enforcement may affect your company. Find out more >>
EPA mandatory emissions reporting starts Jan 1st
CSA Standards can help your organization get ready for compliance. Find out how. >>
Join the Discussion
Recent Daily News [ see all ]
- 11/06/2009
- 11/05/2009
- 11/04/2009
- Emissions Intensity Falling Globally
- JohnsonDiversey Ups GHG Reduction Target to 25%
- Sainsbury’s Offers Free London Electric Car Charging
- Carbon Trading Could Trigger a ‘Sub-prime Style’ Economic Crash
- Peabody, Exxon Accused of Undermining Climate Talks
- BMW, Toyota, Ford Tout Eco-cars
- In ‘Apathy Gap,’ Energy Efficiency at Home Ranks Low
- China Pushes for CO2 Storage, Not Emissions Reductions
- Clean Tech VC Funding On Rebound, Up 50% Since 2nd Quarter
- IECC Building Code Recommendations Add Up to 30% in Energy Efficiency Gains
- Disney Buys $7M in Reforestation Offsets, a Corporate Record
- McKesson to Save $300K Via Fuel-Efficient Vehicles
- Sprint to Save $2.1M With Eco-Friendly Packaging
- U.S. Export-Import Bank Adopts Carbon Policy to Support Renewable Energy
- Greening the Automotive Supply Chain
- Yokohama Rubber Cuts GHG Emissions 13.4% in 2008
- Electronics Industry Lawsuit Called ‘Attack on States’ Rights’
- Wal-Mart Adding LEDs to 650 Stores
- One Committee Down for Senate Climate Bill, Five More to Go
- EU Poised to Give Heavy Industry Free Carbon Permits
- ResponsibleTravel.com Scuttles Carbon Offsetting Option
- U.S. Cap-and-Trade Creates Winners and Losers among Largest Emitters
- DOE Awards $155M to Make Industrial Sector More Energy Efficient
- System Upgrades Power Up Energy Savings for Hotels
- Xerox Cuts GHG Emissions by 20% from 2002
- Waste Management Landfill Gas Project Complete
- Intel, Pepsi, Kohl’s Stay Atop Green Power Partnership list
- Wal-Mart Thinks Big With Smaller Stores
- Despite Critics, Gore ‘Proud’ to Invest in Green Firms
- Metal Recyclers Spar Over Ship Recycling Site
Industry Voices [ see all ]
A Roadmap for a Renewable Energy Partnership
Brad Cashaw
Vice President
Quaker Foods and Snacks Supply Chain and Sustainability
Forest Carbon Core to Climate Change Deal
Chris Elliott
Forest Carbon Initiative Lead
World Wildlife Fund
VCS and CarbonFix Tops in Review of Forestry Carbon Standards
Paulo Lopes
Carbon Management Consultant
Carbon Clear






Reader Comments
Having a “strategy” implies a coherent, documented plan. It’s not surprising that few companies have this given how early we are in the lifecycle – very much at the assessment stage for most companies.
http://www.ecounit.com
Kent Ragen | June 12th, 2008
Or you could make your headline 66% either HAVE developed or ARE developing a sustainability strategy — which is an encouraging thought.
Glass half full time? Or are we ok with standard media sensationalism?
zach @ Pennywise | June 12th, 2008
I work with and talk with a lot of companies – across a wide range of sizes and understandings about sustainability. There is no way 50% businesses have a sustainability strategy – no matter what kind of business we are talking about. Not yet.
Phil Berry | June 13th, 2008
While these statistics are not surprising, they are disappointing. It’s time for radical change…now. And I think it begins with socially-strategic leadership. I believe the way up is the only way out. By “up” I mean socially-strategic leadership is a bigger way of thinking than our current thought-systems. It’s not harder to think this way; it’s actually more fun, more rewarding, and far more interesting. So get going! Please visit http://www.realeadership.com.
Will Marre | June 16th, 2008