50% Of Businesses Lack Sustainability Strategy

June 12, 2008

Email this story Print this post Add your comments

One-half of businesses recently polled lack a sustainability strategy. Those with a strategy are more likely to be focused on improving perceptions and responding to increasing regulations, rather than meeting social needs or generating revenue opportunities.

CEOs made up the majority of respondents to the survey, developed by The Vandiver Group and sponsored by PR firm Pinnacle Worldwide, and although less than half have a strategy today, 55 percent said sustainability will grow in importance and require increased resources and attention.

The results also show that companies are more focused on perception (7.1 on a 10-point scale) than revenue growth (rated 6 on the same scale). Meanwhile, companies rated reducing consumption and increasing pollution control as more important (7.1 and 6.6 out of 10, respectively) than meeting social needs (5.28 out of 10 points) as drivers of their sustainability strategies.

The study found that nearly one-third of businesses are developing a sustainability strategy, and just less than one-half already have an existing strategy. Six percent of respondents characterized their company as a “recognized leader” in sustainability. The survey found that larger companies were slightly more likely than smaller companies to have strategies and staff dedicated to the area of sustainability. An overwhelming 75 percent of respondents said sustainability is either “an important part of our organization’s corporate strategy,” or said they expect the topic “to become increasingly important in the future.”

Other findings include:
• CEOs were reported to be the primary drivers of sustainability decisions, with communications and public affairs managers rarely in that role.
• More than 65 percent of companies do not have dedicated sustainability staff. Of those with dedicated staff; nearly half have fewer than five employees working more than half of their time on sustainability.
• “Improving perception of the company” was rated as more important than increasing revenue via sustainability programs. However, revenue was still seen as “somewhat important.”
• Nearly half of companies surveyed have less than $50,000 allocated annually to sustainability-related programs. Ten percent have more than $50,000 allocated, and 3 percent have more than $500,000 allocated.

•

Email this story Print this post Add your comments

Advertisers

Stay competitive through sustainability.

Find out how at the SAP Sustainability Resource Center. >>

Unclear about the EPA's new GHG Rule?

Learn how it could affect your business. >>

EPA mandatory emissions reporting starts Jan 1st

CSA Standards can help your organization get ready for compliance. Find out how. >>

Survey Results: Product Environmental Compliance Best Practices

How to achieve compliance at a significantly lower cost. Download the full report. >>

Join the Discussion

Reader Comments

Having a “strategy” implies a coherent, documented plan. It’s not surprising that few companies have this given how early we are in the lifecycle – very much at the assessment stage for most companies.
http://www.ecounit.com

Kent Ragen | June 12th, 2008

Or you could make your headline 66% either HAVE developed or ARE developing a sustainability strategy — which is an encouraging thought.

Glass half full time? Or are we ok with standard media sensationalism?

zach @ Pennywise | June 12th, 2008

I work with and talk with a lot of companies – across a wide range of sizes and understandings about sustainability. There is no way 50% businesses have a sustainability strategy – no matter what kind of business we are talking about. Not yet.

Phil Berry | June 13th, 2008

While these statistics are not surprising, they are disappointing. It’s time for radical change…now. And I think it begins with socially-strategic leadership. I believe the way up is the only way out. By “up” I mean socially-strategic leadership is a bigger way of thinking than our current thought-systems. It’s not harder to think this way; it’s actually more fun, more rewarding, and far more interesting. So get going! Please visit http://www.realeadership.com.

Will Marre | June 16th, 2008

Recent Daily News [ see all ]

11/23/2009
11/20/2009
11/19/2009

Charts [ see all ]

European Paper Industry Cuts CO2 Emissions by 42% since 1990

S. America Takes Most Urgent View of Copenhagen Talks

Nike Tops Annual Climate Action Scores

Oceans May Trap more Carbon than Forests

Jobs

View All Jobs >> Post a Job >>

Comments and Discussions

Tom Stacy on National Grid Again Rejects High Costs of Offshore Wind
"Each time government entices big money investment away from riskier, but clearly..."

miggs on European Paper Industry Cuts CO2 Emissions by 42% since 1990
"Yet another example of the potential of combined heat & power to transform..."

Stevenson on News Corp. Taps Hara for Energy Efficiency, Environmental Management
"All of us should think of ways to save energy now. It is not a myth,..."

Trade Association on Trade Group on EPA Chemical Regs: ‘If Everything is a Priority, Then Nothing is a Priority’
"Seriously… that..."

Gary Markowitz on Supermarkets Tackle Emissions Reductions, Fuel Efficiency
"Supermarkets waste over 10 percent of their energy through improper..."

peter in ireland on Ontario May Follow California’s Lead on TV Energy Efficiency
"Governor Schwarzenegger is shooting himself in the foot! 1...."

Environmental Leader on S. America Takes Most Urgent View of Copenhagen Talks
"The survey respondents (the PDF report mentions 4,000 respondents in 38..."

Environmental Leader