The Executive’s Daily Green Briefing

June 17, 2008

Consumers Understand Greenwash, So Why Can’t The Communications Industry?

consumers-understand-greenwash-6576.jpgAs company marketing and advertising departments are waking up to the huge commercial opportunities within the emerging ‘green’ market, it is no surprise that consumers have started to articulate that they feel ‘greenwashed.’

Today, communications is about big ideas, creativity and implicitly being generous with the truth. But this sort of marketing is getting stale and as consumers, we’re suffering from communication fatigue. Moreover, this is damaging brands, losing them both trust and loyalty. Could this be why 57% of us are more likely to believe recommendations from family or friends than advertisers in choosing products and services? This ‘fast forwarding’ of advertising by consumers represents a real challenge to the communications industry.

The industry has lost sight of what communications should be about; delivering a message in a real, honest, transparent way. It is not difficult to deliver green claims in a way that is truthful, relevant and clear.

But clearly, for some brands, it is easier to attempt to change consumers’ opinions though creative advertising campaigns than to tackle the real issues at the heart of what they do.

Shell: Don’t throw anything away, there is no away.

An oil refinery emitting flowers? That’s pretty creative advertising. But with an element of truth; Shell claimed that it used waste carbon dioxide to grow flowers and waste sulphur to make concrete. The problem is one of scale; while Shell may indeed use some of their waste carbon dioxide to grow flowers, this represents only a small proportion of their waste carbon dioxide. What’s more, Shell has failed to stop gas flaring in the Niger Delta, despite making a commitment to end the practice.

Renault: Economical, Ecological

The advert, for Renault Twingo, set the car against a green background and depicted leaves emerging from its exhaust. The car is neither economical nor efficient; it is categorized as band C in the vehicle excise duty rankings for efficiency and did not feature in the Department for Tranport’s list of top 10 low carbon dioxide cars. The ASA have instructed Renault not run the ad again.

Though somewhat imaginative in the replacement of greenhouse gases with flowers and leaves, this is well-established greenwash territory and hardly creative advertising. Besides, there are far more exciting ways to engage consumers with sustainability.

Patagonia: The Footprint Chronicles

Admitting the less attractive aspects of their supply chain helps Patagonia reinforce their overall objectives. Patagonia’s most remarkable initiative, in terms of its commitment to sustainability is The Footprint Chronicles. An on-line exploration of the backstories of ten representative Patagonia products, The Footprint Chronicles is filled with compelling graphics, thoughtful explanations, even a blog, which appears to be open and transparent in its discussion. And not a leaf or a flower in sight.

In an age when consumers are using the Internet to actively seek the truth about brands; what brands do is so much more important than what they say. But we seem to have forgotten that actions speak louder than words.

Diana Verde Nieto is Founder and CEO of Clownfish www.clownfish.co.uk a communications and brand agency dedicated to making sustainability tangible for business.

ADVERTISERS

Join the Discussion

Comments

I’m surprised to see Patagonia’s campaign on this list. There is nothing “greenwash” about this company. In fact its founder is considered to be one of the greenest and most pioneering corporate leaders by almost everyone in the environmental community.

Diana Verde Nieto apparently doesn’t understand the differnce between using slick advertising to “greenwash” ala Shell, and a truly green company using good marketing to spread its message. “Greenwash” is about deception, people. Not about an innovative green company using good marketing tactics.

We all need to be careful about grouping all of the corporate world’s green initiatives into the “greenwash” category. Not all marketing related to the environment belongs there.

I think Rita McConnell misunderstands the point that Diana Verde Nieto is making. It is clear that she is highlighting the difference between using slick advertising to greenwash and a truly green company like Patagonia using good marketing, not confusing the two.

Not only be authentic where things come from, but also go to… recently an Eco Mom told me she wants to see a video of how/where her recycled e-waste goes. She doesn’t trust that it will not in up in some other mother’s backyard in a third world country.

Patagonia is an excellent example of walking the walk. I just bought a reclaimed threads hoodie. I liked its Life Cycle story, but I bought it for its wearability. I’m so tired of putting good money into clothes that don’t last.

for me it is clear why the communications industry (i.e. PR/ advertising firms don’t). they have not been paid to get it, and the more they get it, the less people will consume.

I am currently working on a major project for a leading PR firm, and it is the must frustrating experience I have ever had. “it is a show” is something I have heard on multiple occasions as they speak about their own program, and I shutter to think that they actually advise others.

It is clear that while CSR is a term created by PR firms to sell more business, they are the ones who are themost conflicted commercially by true consumer awareness and sustainability

I agree that Diana is using Patagonia as a good example and she could have made that a little clearer. Green washing, even the proliferation of green certifications, as I blogged about last week, is definitely a problem. The FTC is in the process of updating its green marketing guidelines and hopefully this will help ease the problem.

Hayden is correct — I DID misunderstand this on the first read. But that fact just furthers the point I made. If we’re communicating about things that are complex, we need to be clearer in the way we do it. When we aren’t we get these greenwash arguements that hinder the efforts of companies trying to make real change. A great example is Wal-Mart — people keep insisting they are greenwashing, but in many areas they are making true change. Much of the public refuses to accept that beacuse its still stuck in the old perceptual model of what Wal-Mart is. Diana — be clearer next time — and EL, write headlines that are clearer. I saw it on the second read, but the story really looks like its hitting Patagonia.

Today's News

The Evolving Green Challenge for Manufacturing

The Evolving Green Challenge for Manufacturing

Unless you have been incommunicado for the last few years, you realize that the focus on green manufacturing has swept across Europe, ... continue »

COP 15 Offers Communications Opportunities
Greening the Apparel Supply Chain: Tapping the Power of Collective Leverage
Sustainability and its Impact on Brand Value
The Advertising Industry, Sustainability and the Bottom Line
Cause Marketing Can Result In Sales Lift

Cause Marketing Can Result In Sales Lift

Cause-related marketing can exponentially increase sales, in one case as much as 74 percent, resulting in millions of dollars in potential revenue ...

click to view full size chart »

$5.2 Billion Invested in Cleantech Since January 2007
Green Efforts Insignificant in Winning, Keeping 3PL Business
Google Says Its Data Centers Most Efficient
Geothermal Could Be Answer To Countering Climate Change

Geothermal Could Be Answer To Countering Climate Change

As the world looks for ways to counter climate change and reduce the carbon footprint, the most abundant energy source might be ...

click to view video »

Miller Recycles 99.9% of Packaging Waste
Credit Crunch Could Hurt Mitsubishi’s Eco-Car Push
What’s The Price Tag For A Carbon Neutral U.S. Economy?
The Bottom Line

Marketing

Cause Marketing Can Result In Sales Lift

Green Mountain Coffee Helps Vermont Cut Energy Use

Payless ShoeSource Launching Eco-Friendly Footwear

Emissions

DHL: Carbon Neutral Supply Chains Possible, Takes Time

Dairy’s Carbon Footprint Drops to 12 Pounds Per Gallon

Toyota Announces Utah’s First LEED-certified Dealership

Hi-Tech

Top 10 Low Power Desktop PCs

Survey: Apple Most Eco-Friendly, Greenpeace Says Different

Google Says Its Data Centers Most Efficient

Efficiency

California Tops ACEEE’s State Energy Efficiency Scorecard

Coffee Bean Opens LEED-Certified Facility in Portland

Applied Materials Unveils 2 Megawatt Solar System

Manufacturing

The Evolving Green Challenge for Manufacturing

World Steel Association Publishes Sustainability Report

Greening the Apparel Supply Chain: Tapping the Power of Collective Leverage

Carbon Offsets/RECs

Financial Crisis Threatens EU’s Carbon Plans

Pepsi Bottling Group Cuts 16,000 Tons of Plastic in 2007

Gap Flips Switch On 1 Megawatt Solar Power System

CSR Reports

AT&T Releases Sustainability Report

Autodesk HQ Cuts Emissions with Lighting Upgrades

Staples Saved Over 540,000 Gallons of Diesel in 2007

Major Players

PR Agency Warned Starbucks About Wasteful Water Policy

Sun, Pfizer Surpass Carbon Reduction Goals

Green Efforts Insignificant in Winning, Keeping 3PL Business

See All Topics »