June 19, 2008

Toyota ‘Zero Emissions’ Ad Ruled ‘Misleading’

Bookmark and Share Email this story Print this post Add your comments

The Belgian advertising standards authority says an advertisement for the Toyota Prius in the European Voice newspaper was misleading, EUBusiness reports.

Friends of the Earth Europe’s car efficiency campaigner, Jeroen Verhoeven, who filed a complaint against the Prius advertisement that included the words “Zero emissions low,” said it was an example of a ‘misinformation campaign’ by carmakers.

“Car manufacturers are using ‘greenwash’ advertising to confuse consumers whilst at the same time blocking EU proposals for a target of 120g CO2/km by 2012. If Toyota is serious about reaching ‘zero emissions’ anytime soon then why are they blocking a 2012 target?” he said.

The advertisement violated a European labeling directive because it did not contain any CO2 emission or fuel consumption data.

The UK’s Advertising Standards Authority released its Annual Report 2007  in May. The ASA said it dealt with record numbers of complaints about environmental claims as advertisers increasingly sought to promote their ‘green’ credentials. Complaints about environmental claims more than doubled year on year with 556 complaints about 408 ads.

Lexus’ headline claim in a magazine ad “High Performance. Low Emissions. Zero Guilt” was ruled misleading because the text in the ad which clarified the claim was not prominent enough and the claim “Zero Guilt” implied the car caused ittle or no harm to the environment.

Norway’s state-run advertising watchdog issued guidelines to advertisers that say, “We ask that … phrases such as ‘environmentally friendly’, ‘green’, ‘clean’, ‘environmental car’, ‘natural’ or similar descriptions not be used in marketing cars,.” Even mentioning the word carbon dioxide draws a red flag.

Diana Verde Nieto, founder and CEO of Clownfish, a communications and brand agency dedicated to making sustainability tangible for business, says it’s not difficult to deliver green claims in a way that is truthful, relevant and clear.

Bookmark and Share Email this story Print this post Add your comments

Advertisers

Join the Discussion

Reader Comments

Every single day we are bombarded with new stories of something being eco-friendly. But can we really make eco-friendly goods? Or are we talking about eco-friendlier? Everything has an impact on the environment. Some just more than others. So why do we insist that some things are eco-friendly and others not. Is it not just a case of eco-friendlier than the alternative? Is a Prius eco-friendly? No. You won’t suck on the exhaust pipe. It is just better than the alternative. More on this at my blog in http://angryafrican.net/2008/02/17/make-it-better-how-friendly-is-eco-friendly/

Get EL Daily in your inbox, subscribe to free newsletter

Recent Daily News [ see all ]

  • 02/09/2010
  • 02/08/2010
  • 02/05/2010

Recent Jobs

Post a Job
Jobs powered by Simply Hired

Comments and Discussions

John Bergdoll on Accidental to Purposeful Sustainability: Using What You Already Have to Grow Sustainability
"I was following the logic your article..."

Liz Amason on Clorox Comes Clean With Chemical Content on Web Site
"But look at their ingredients listings. For example, their regular liquid bleach..."

Rigidflexibility on Companies Going Green Should Ignore Green Consumer
"I was about to market a metal working fluid that is 98>% Soybean oil and..."

Stuart on Canadian Environment Minister Denounces Quebec Vehicle Emissions Regs
"Canadians have been waiting for the feds to act on climate change for..."

Steve Wolford on Sports Teams Embrace Sustainability
"Hello Environmental Leader, We just returned from the National Sport Forum in Baltimore. Team and..."

Mauibrad on Bipartisan Senatorial Effort Seeks Cap and Trade for non-CO2 Emissions
"Finally some enlightened ideas out of Congress!"

Cameron Green on Data Centers Can Apply for Energy Star Rating in June
"I did a blog post about this. Essentially PUE doesn’t give you very much..."