June 24, 2008

James Hansen: Try Fossil Fuel CEOs For ‘High Crimes Against Humanity’

Bookmark and Share Email this story Print this post Add your comments

James Hansen, one of the world’s leading climate scientists, told the House Select Committee On Energy Independence And Global Warming that he is 99-percent certain that the concentration of CO2 in the atmosphere has already risen beyond the safe level (PDF of speech, charts), The Guardian reports.

Hansen, who was one of the first to tell the U.S. Congress about global warming 20 years ago, said a carbon tax is the most efficient way to curb emissions that cause global warming.

Likening chief executive officers of energy companies to those of cigarette companies who once publicly denied the health hazards of smoking knowing the possible consequences, Hansen said, “We have to level with the public that there has to be a price on carbon emissions. That is the only way we are going to begin to move toward a carbon free economy.”

Hansen went on to say: “CEOs of fossil energy companies know what they are doing and are aware of long-term
consequences of continued business as usual. In my opinion, these CEOs should be tried for
high crimes against humanity and nature.”

Hansen called for a moratorium on coal-fired power plants that aren’t equipped with carbon capture systems:

“The thing that I think is most important is to block coal-fired power plants,” [AP reports Hansen as saying]. “I’m not yet at the point of chaining myself but we somehow have to draw attention to this.”

Frank Maisano, a spokesman for many U.S. utilities, including those trying to build new coal plants, said while Hansen has shown foresight as a scientist, his “stop them all approach is very simplistic” and shows that he is beyond his level of expertise.

Hansen also called for an overhaul of regulations to ensure utilities are rewarded for promoting energy efficiency, BusinessGreen reports.

While he said he would campaign to unseat several members of Congress who have a poor climate change voting record, Hansen also blamed special interest lobbyists for a what he called a criminal lack of political action.

“The problem is not political will, it’s … the lobbyists. It’s the fact that money talks in Washington, and that democracy is not working the way it’s intended to work.”

In related news, a group launched the 350.org campaign the same day Hansen spoke to Congressional leaders. The group, named after the “safe line for our global climate,” has taken out full-page advertisements in major papers around the world calling a reduction in the target level of CO2 to 350ppm. Hansen, and about 150 others, are backing the advertisements.

Bookmark and Share Email this story Print this post Add your comments

Advertisers

Join the Discussion

Reader Comments

Here’s a solution. Continue researching alternate energy harvesting methods and work towards reducing the Earth’s human population to one billion; it can be done in one hundred years. Is there any reliable data on how much carbon each human uses on average? Re-forest the Earth’s forest population to at least 25% of what it used to be (The planet currently has only 5% of its original forests).

James Hansen is a total nut. Thank God he isn’t in charge of anything of consequence. Professor Arkham is right there with him. I wonder what he plans to do with the 5-6 billion people he doesn’t have room for on the earth.

If Hansen is right, there won’t be much point in trying the CEOs for crimes against humanity – we’ll all be struggling to survive.

It’s a tragedy that global warming skeptics need a tidal wave of evidence even to engage in a debate over humanity’s role in the climate crisis. Fortunately, we have contemporary heroes will to say what others are afraid even to think.

Thank you, Dr. Hansen and thank you, Environmental Leader for publishing this important piece!

Strange no one has bothered to actually go back and look at the predictions Hansen made in his 1988 testimony?

The last page of his prepared remarks had a historical time-series of global mean temperature through 1987, plus predictions for various scenarios through 2019.

Well, we have 20 more years of data now – how do his predictions look so far? Wildly wrong.

Check it out – all the data here:

http://tinyurl.com/6cms9f

Get EL Daily in your inbox, subscribe to free newsletter

Recent Daily News [ see all ]

  • 11/24/2009
  • 11/23/2009
  • 11/20/2009

Recent Jobs

Post a Job
Jobs powered by Simply Hired

Comments and Discussions

Btok on Canada Delays GHG Emissions Regs, Russia Ups Emissions Cuts
"http://www.infowars.com/dr-tim -ball-on-the-significance-o..."

ruffie on Wind Power Investments Grow in North America
"Anyone with any knowledge of the energy business in Canada knows that the majority of smart..."

Rod Johnson on Stimulus Package Delivers $2.4 Billion for Electric Vehicle Projects
"Will this stimulus be extended to other electric utility vehicles?"

James Beddingfield on Oceans May Trap more Carbon than Forests
"Another great thing about an ocean-based carbon sink is that it can’t..."

Custom Organic Shirts on Climate Scientists Alleged to Have Manipulated Data
"Wow, EL – should have seriously done even some background research..."

Phil on Climate Scientists Alleged to Have Manipulated Data
"Pete old boy, why don’t you just trot out the math that carries you from your..."