‘Large Rhetorical Statement’ On Emissions Reductions Expected At G8

June 29, 2008

Email this story Print this post Add your comments

Pew Environment Group Deputy Managing Director Philip Clapp said in a telephone briefing that the likely outcome of the G8 climate change talks July 7-9 is a “large rhetorical statement that everyone is committed to reduce their (carbon) emissions,” AFP reports.

“There has been a very little agreement on actual outcome from that process that will be announced on the final day of the G8 summit on July 9, coinciding with the conclusion of the summit itself,” Clapp says.

He said that while he expects “a little more definition as to the levels nations should agree to,” he doesn’t expect any significant negotiations to take place.

In May, environment ministers from the Group of Eight nations pledged “strong political will” toward cutting greenhouse gas emissions in half by 2050 but stopped short of pledging firm commitments for mid-century or mid-term goals for 2020.

Even Japanese Prime Minister Yasuo Fukuda conceded recently that the G8 would not set targets on cutting post-Kyoto protocol GHG emissions.

Tokyo is the first city in Japan to pass legislation that, by fall of 2010, will require a cap-and-trade scheme for emissions from 1,300 of the biggest polluters there that are responsible for 20 percent of emissions in the capital.

In a statement prepared by the World Economic Forum and presented to Fukuda recently, 99 companies said a new climate change treaty with incentives to capture and store CO2 is needed to fight global warming.

Email this story Print this post Add your comments

Advertisers

Make sustainability part of your strategy.

Get equipped at the SAP Sustainability Resource Center. >>

EFFECTIVELY MANAGE WATER COMPLIANCE

Understand how increased enforcement may affect your company. Find out more >>

EPA mandatory emissions reporting starts Jan 1st

CSA Standards can help your organization get ready for compliance. Find out how. >>

Join the Discussion

Reader Comments

In order for realistic goals to be set and attained, a more accountable timescale needs to be scheduled. Setting goals 40 years away will achieve nothing, except hollow glory. The United States will likely block any effort to set any kind of time table, so the U.S. should simply be ignored, including any attempts to negotiate any delays and inaction, which the U.S. has sponsored for the past 16+ years.

No new coal-fired power plants (use PV, solar thermal, wind, and SHEC Labs’ technology for H2 production for overnight energy),
Tax new SUVs to provide funds for new, efficient auto (hybrids, etc…) subsidies,
Build more railroads,
Buy local produce (www.localharvest.org),
use a clothesline,
use a rake and a reel lawnmower for the lawn care,
….

CO2 is at 385 ppm, and climbing rapidly. Nobody really knows what this will do to our climate system. Time is running short.

All the best!

newEnergyWorks | June 29th, 2008