July 10, 2008
Are Consumers Falling Off The Green Wagon, And Should We Care?
A Newsweek columnist laments, “I’m so tired of being green” and admits to tossing a gooey peanut butter jar into the trash because she doesn’t want to rinse it out before recycling.
The New York Times warns “That Buzz in Your Ear May Be Green Noise” in a recent Fashion & Style Section story that ponders over glass versus paper milk containers, and whether “to Nalgene or not to Nalgene.”
Even I – in the middle of a recent vacation in Mexico – allowed pangs of guilt to creep up for not offsetting my evil air travel, and for going through heaven knows how many plastic bottles of water (between margaritas of course).
Call it “green noise.” Call it “green fatigue.” According to more and more news reports, people are starting to tune out the environment. Is that really the case? If so, we must ask ourselves why. Is it the economy, or is it us?
First the economy. Recycling every peanut butter jar doesn’t cost anything extra, and frankly it’s not going to “save the planet.” That leaves us – business. We’re the ones responsible for green marketing messages, and we’re the ones who have the greatest potential to effect real environmental change. Whether it’s recycling glass or choosing milk in the lightest container, consumers can only do as much as infrastructure and the marketplace will bear.
In a recent interview, my business partner and I were asked to “Riff on 16 Household Eco-Dilemmas” fired in staccato succession: paper or plastic, gas grill or charcoal, disposable or cloth diapers? These quandaries are surprisingly complex, and we have far from succinct and not always environmentally honorable answers. (Kevin grills with gas, I use charcoal, and apparently gas takes the eco-edge but just barely. I always wash my laundry in cold water, but I happen to know Kevin would just as soon lick the floor.)
Now I ask myself: How would the above exercise unfold, having to riff on business eco-dilemmas. It might go like this: Styrofoam or washable coffee cups. Pretty simple. How about recycling versus disposal; steel or aseptic packaging; offsetting or emissions reductions; hybrid or hydrogen fuel-cell vehicle technologies; allocated versus auctioned carbon caps?
On July 8, the U.S. and other G-8 nations committed to cutting greenhouse gas emissions in half by 2050. Some say that’s too little, with no short-term goals, but still it’s something. Regardless of what exactly happens next, or who will be our president come January, change is coming and the implications are significant. So what can we do about the future, realistically? Smart businesses will anticipate and be ready for what change is inevitable. Great businesses will lead the way, with big ideas that make a huge difference — and perhaps save or make money. Some of these ideas may even be worthy of a consumer marketing campaign that makes sense and is relevant to everyone.
So, do consumers really need to sweat the small stuff when it comes to the environment? Sure. Drive efficiently, don’t drown your lawn, turn off the lights. And to the Newsweek columnist: next time, put the peanut butter jar in the dishwasher (full loads only please) and then into the recycling bin.
Valerie Davis is president of Green Canary Sustainability Consulting.
Advertisers
Stay competitive through sustainability.
Find out how at the SAP Sustainability Resource Center. >>
Unclear about the EPA's new GHG Rule?
Learn how it could affect your business. >>
EPA mandatory emissions reporting starts Jan 1st
CSA Standards can help your organization get ready for compliance. Find out how. >>
Survey Results: Product Environmental Compliance Best Practices
How to achieve compliance at a significantly lower cost. Download the full report. >>
Join the Discussion
Recent Daily News [ see all ]
- 11/20/2009
- 11/19/2009
- 11/18/2009
- Ontario May Follow California’s Lead on TV Energy Efficiency
- EPA Is One Step Closer to New Ship Emissions Standards
- European Paper Industry Cuts CO2 Emissions by 42% since 1990
- CDP Launches Water Disclosure Project
- Whirlpool Cuts Water Use by Nearly 22% from 2004 to 2008
- National Grid Again Rejects High Costs of Offshore Wind
- California City’s Green Building Ordinance Applies to Commercial Buildings
- Agilent To Save $3.5M Over 10 Years With Solar
- S. America Takes Most Urgent View of Copenhagen Talks
- Texas, China Wind Partners May Build U.S. Factory to Appease Critical Lawmaker
- Volvo, Mack Engines First to Meet 2010 EPA Emissions Standards
- Around the Web – Nike, Google, Nissan, Bush’s Green Library, WWF
- Fossil Fuel Emissions Rose 29% since 2000
- SEC Charges Four in ‘Green’ Investment Ponzi Scheme
- No Sunny Skies for Two Solar Projects in Texas, California
- Canada Delays GHG Emissions Regs, Russia Ups Emissions Cuts
- News Corp. Taps Hara for Energy Efficiency, Environmental Management
- Rising Sea Levels Would Hit U.S. East Coast Hardest
- Building an Energy-Efficient Data Center Using Virtualization Technology
- Trade Group on EPA Chemical Regs: ‘If Everything is a Priority, Then Nothing is a Priority’
- A/V Equipment Gets New Energy Star Requirements
- By Scaling Back Catalogs, JC Penney to Save 30% on Paper
- Around the Web – Starbucks, EcoFactor, UPS, Brownfields, Eco-Labels
- Subaru Touts Energy & Environmental Initiatives
- U.S., China Partner on Renewable Energy, Energy Efficiency
- Green Buildings Do Double Duty: Reduce Energy Use, Lower Financial Risk
- UK to Ease Rules for On-Site Renewable Energy Installations
- Intel Eyes Wind, Electric Cars
- Nike Tops Annual Climate Action Scores
- Iranian Tanker Firm to Cut Fuel Use 28%
- Corporate Jetsetters Can be Carbon Offsetters
- USPS Energy Use Down 9% From 2005 to 2008
- From Solar Applications to Christmas, LEDs Light the Night
- EPA May Regulate Sulfur Dioxide Emissions on Hourly Basis
- MITEI: Sustainable Energy & Terawatt-Scale Photovoltaics
- Around the Web – Health Care & Energy, Shell, NBC
Charts [ see all ]
Popular Topics
Energy Efficiency
Data Center
Emissions
Facilities
Electricity
Sustainability
Water
Supply Chain
Efficiency
Green Marketing
Strategy & Leadership
Research
Fleets & Transportation
Carbon Finance
Conventional Energy
Clean Energy
Waste & Recycling
Paper & Packaging
Policy & Law
Utilities
Construction
Comments and Discussions
Trade Association on Trade Group on EPA Chemical Regs: ‘If Everything is a Priority, Then Nothing is a Priority’
"Seriously… that..."
Gary Markowitz on Supermarkets Tackle Emissions Reductions, Fuel Efficiency
"Supermarkets waste over 10 percent of their energy through improper..."
peter in ireland on Ontario May Follow California’s Lead on TV Energy Efficiency
"Governor Schwarzenegger is shooting himself in the foot! 1...."
Environmental Leader on S. America Takes Most Urgent View of Copenhagen Talks
"The survey respondents (the PDF report mentions 4,000 respondents in 38..."
Jake on UPS Trying New Hydraulic Hybrid Trucks
"A point of clarification: the Reuters press release referenced herein reports that 20 UPS will purchase..."
Custom Organic Shirts on S. America Takes Most Urgent View of Copenhagen Talks
"90% of North Americans believe it is urgent to get a global climate..."
peter dublin on California City’s Green Building Ordinance Applies to Commercial Buildings
"Why energy efficiebnt regulation on buildings –..."




Reader Comments
What’s missing here is respect for the power of the ordinary..the way personal actions en masse establish the new normal and translate to demand for green products, services and POLICIES. At the end of the day, our power is flexed as consumers, investors and citizens. You and I are the last great hope for the US and the world.
will | July 10th, 2008
People are jumping off the green band wagon because its turned into an elitist , expensive option. Even the only channel dedicated to going green and helping the earth, is a premium pay channel. You can not even be educated in going green without paying out the nose. Solar , wind, even green products cost so much more than paying the electric or gas bills. Most people who are struggling to pay the bills, mortgage and feed their kids, are not in a position to spend thousands more just to go green. Right now they want to survive. Green, is still in the boom stage, where everyone wants to make the big dollars off of it. In 10 or 15 years when the elitist get tired of it, and the huge profit margins are no longer sought out, then we might have a chance of actually becoming more of a green world. Right now, its a rich persons luxury.
Dan | July 11th, 2008
Will is so right. We really need to take personal action en masse. All people have to be informed. Annie
Annie Loi | July 13th, 2008