<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Green Architecture&#8217;s New Goal: Affordable But Stylish Sustainability</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.environmentalleader.com/2008/07/14/green-architectures-new-goal-affordable-but-stylish-sustainability/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.environmentalleader.com/2008/07/14/green-architectures-new-goal-affordable-but-stylish-sustainability/</link>
	<description>The Executive's Daily Green Briefing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 19:30:36 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Susan Di Giulio</title>
		<link>http://www.environmentalleader.com/2008/07/14/green-architectures-new-goal-affordable-but-stylish-sustainability/comment-page-1/#comment-62126</link>
		<dc:creator>Susan Di Giulio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 19:36:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.environmentalleader.com/2008/07/14/green-architectures-new-goal-affordable-but-stylish-sustainability/#comment-62126</guid>
		<description>Edward Mazria&#039;s &quot;2030 Challenge&quot; proposal is great, and, I beleive, eminently do-able. The article itself is somewhat misleading, in it&#039;s reference to aesthetic and financial &quot;downsides&quot; of sustainibiity.  Inexpensive and attractive options for greening up lower cost projects are everywhere. The example given of Bamboo flooring is erroneous: even a cursory comparison on the Home Depot and Lumber Liquidator&#039;s websites shows that in the area of pre-finished hardwood flooring, bamboo is comparable to or cheaper than oak. And this is only natural, as there is a major cost savings associated with  faster-growing material. In similar fashion, decisions which save energy also save money. Choosing Energy Star rated appliances and materials, providing a bit more insulation, light color roofing, orientation of the building and windows, all go very, very far in increasing the &quot;green&quot; quotient of a project at little or no additional cost. In addition, there are lots of rebate and incentive programs available to finance these enhancements. 
It&#039;s really time to &quot;get to yes&quot; on sustainable development, and stop being held back by oft-repeated objections from the past.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Edward Mazria&#8217;s &#8220;2030 Challenge&#8221; proposal is great, and, I beleive, eminently do-able. The article itself is somewhat misleading, in it&#8217;s reference to aesthetic and financial &#8220;downsides&#8221; of sustainibiity.  Inexpensive and attractive options for greening up lower cost projects are everywhere. The example given of Bamboo flooring is erroneous: even a cursory comparison on the Home Depot and Lumber Liquidator&#8217;s websites shows that in the area of pre-finished hardwood flooring, bamboo is comparable to or cheaper than oak. And this is only natural, as there is a major cost savings associated with  faster-growing material. In similar fashion, decisions which save energy also save money. Choosing Energy Star rated appliances and materials, providing a bit more insulation, light color roofing, orientation of the building and windows, all go very, very far in increasing the &#8220;green&#8221; quotient of a project at little or no additional cost. In addition, there are lots of rebate and incentive programs available to finance these enhancements.<br />
It&#8217;s really time to &#8220;get to yes&#8221; on sustainable development, and stop being held back by oft-repeated objections from the past.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dag</title>
		<link>http://www.environmentalleader.com/2008/07/14/green-architectures-new-goal-affordable-but-stylish-sustainability/comment-page-1/#comment-61910</link>
		<dc:creator>Dag</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 20:27:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.environmentalleader.com/2008/07/14/green-architectures-new-goal-affordable-but-stylish-sustainability/#comment-61910</guid>
		<description>&quot;Orientate&quot; is not a word.  The correct usage is &#039;orient&#039;.  The house will be oriented towards the south.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Orientate&#8221; is not a word.  The correct usage is &#8216;orient&#8217;.  The house will be oriented towards the south.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
