‘Green Computing’ Vague, Misleading
Surveying 11 enterprises about their environmental policies, the project found that the term “green,” received heavy criticism. The report said the word was too misleading and is void of “the specific definitions needed to manage carbon and/or other greenhouse gas emissions.”
“The need to set definitions is a thorny one, as different companies offer different power ratings for servers,” according to the article. This is because there are no standards that apply across all companies or all sectors. CDP spokesman Marieke Beckmann agrees, adding that many organizations don’t have an accurate definition of carbon emissions.
Produced in conjunction with IBM, the report set out ways companies could set guidelines on how to reduce carbon emissions.
Companies can start by:
1.¬†¬† ¬†Setting definitions for carbon emissions
2.¬†¬† ¬†Appointing a carbon information manager
3.¬†¬† ¬†Having more detailed electricity billing,
4.¬†¬† ¬†Charting the departmental use of carbon
5.¬†¬† ¬†Taking advantage of videoconferencing and IM
6.¬†¬† ¬†Reducing business travels
The EPA plans to have its first Energy Star rating for servers ready by the end of the year.
Stay Up-to-Date On Environmental Management, Energy & Sustainability News with EL's Free Daily Newsletter
Energy Manager News
- Portland Likely to Require Energy Benchmarking
- Using Building Energy Management for Factories
- New Energy System Will Save Stanford $420M
- Tire Plant Earns Superior Energy Performance Gold Certification
- Acuity Brands Acquires Indoor Location Software Company
- NJ School District Hires Honeywell for Energy Upgrades
- CODA Energy 50 kWh Storage Tower Achieves UL Certification
- Con Edison Development Procures GE Energy Storage System