‘Green Computing’ Vague, Misleading
Surveying 11 enterprises about their environmental policies, the project found that the term “green,” received heavy criticism. The report said the word was too misleading and is void of “the specific definitions needed to manage carbon and/or other greenhouse gas emissions.”
“The need to set definitions is a thorny one, as different companies offer different power ratings for servers,” according to the article. This is because there are no standards that apply across all companies or all sectors. CDP spokesman Marieke Beckmann agrees, adding that many organizations don’t have an accurate definition of carbon emissions.
Produced in conjunction with IBM, the report set out ways companies could set guidelines on how to reduce carbon emissions.
Companies can start by:
1. Setting definitions for carbon emissions
2. Appointing a carbon information manager
3. Having more detailed electricity billing,
4. Charting the departmental use of carbon
5. Taking advantage of videoconferencing and IM
6. Reducing business travels
The EPA plans to have its first Energy Star rating for servers ready by the end of the year.
Energy Manager News
- 30 Environmental Advocacy Groups Call on NARUC for Holistic Rate-Setting Guidelines
- New York State’s Summer of Energy
- Chicago Church Strives for Energy Efficiency
- Small, Medium Size Commercial Building Efficiency Market to Grow
- ERC: Price Benchmark Trends Week Ending June 24, 2016
- FERC Rules Against Tri-State Fee on Local Renewable Power
- Marin Clean Energy to Reduce Rates and Expand Service Area in September
- Drama Aside, Tesla’s Acquisition of SolarCity Makes Sense