July 30, 2008
iCrete Cementing Its Place in NY High-Rises
A new kind of green concrete is gaining traction in some of Manhattan’s high-rises. iCrete touts a 40 percent reduction in GHG emissions, advanced mix designs, and higher performance and quality control; branding itself as the highest strength concrete ever poured in the history of New York.
Less than a year since its introduction, the new concrete has been used in projects such as Freedom Tower, Frank Gehry’s Beekman Tower, 11 Times Square and more than 30 construction sites in the Greater New York Metropolitan Area.
Another company working to make its concrete environmentally friendly is Ceratech which makes its concrete using fly ash, a waste stream product from coal fired power plants.
While the new concretes are making headway, a new study from Earthjustice and the Environmental Integrity Project finds that concretes made from cement kiln are emitting twice the EPA’s mercury pollution estimates in 2006.
The study, Cementing a Toxic Legacy? How EPA Has Failed to Control Mercury Pollution From Cement Kilns, finds:
- Mercury emissions from cement kilns is now estimated to be nearly 23, 000 pounds, twice the EPA’s estimate in 2006 of almost 12,000 pounds.
- A small number of cement plants using extremely dirty raw materials and fuels are among the worst mercury polluters in their states, releasing as much or more mercury as coal fired power plants.
- Future mercury pollution will grow even worse if left unregulated.
Last summer, U.S. Concrete said it substantially replaced traditional Portland cement, which accounts for six to eight percent of human generated CO2 in the environment, with reclaimed fly ash and slag.
Advertisers
Stay competitive through sustainability.
Find out how at the SAP Sustainability Resource Center. >>
Unclear about the EPA's new GHG Rule?
Learn how it could affect your business. >>
EPA mandatory emissions reporting starts Jan 1st
CSA Standards can help your organization get ready for compliance. Find out how. >>
Survey Results: Product Environmental Compliance Best Practices
How to achieve compliance at a significantly lower cost. Download the full report. >>
Join the Discussion
Recent Daily News [ see all ]
- 11/20/2009
- 11/19/2009
- 11/18/2009
- Ontario May Follow California’s Lead on TV Energy Efficiency
- EPA Is One Step Closer to New Ship Emissions Standards
- European Paper Industry Cuts CO2 Emissions by 42% since 1990
- CDP Launches Water Disclosure Project
- Whirlpool Cuts Water Use by Nearly 22% from 2004 to 2008
- National Grid Again Rejects High Costs of Offshore Wind
- California City’s Green Building Ordinance Applies to Commercial Buildings
- Agilent To Save $3.5M Over 10 Years With Solar
- S. America Takes Most Urgent View of Copenhagen Talks
- Texas, China Wind Partners May Build U.S. Factory to Appease Critical Lawmaker
- Volvo, Mack Engines First to Meet 2010 EPA Emissions Standards
- Around the Web – Nike, Google, Nissan, Bush’s Green Library, WWF
- Fossil Fuel Emissions Rose 29% since 2000
- SEC Charges Four in ‘Green’ Investment Ponzi Scheme
- No Sunny Skies for Two Solar Projects in Texas, California
- Canada Delays GHG Emissions Regs, Russia Ups Emissions Cuts
- News Corp. Taps Hara for Energy Efficiency, Environmental Management
- Rising Sea Levels Would Hit U.S. East Coast Hardest
- Building an Energy-Efficient Data Center Using Virtualization Technology
- Trade Group on EPA Chemical Regs: ‘If Everything is a Priority, Then Nothing is a Priority’
- A/V Equipment Gets New Energy Star Requirements
- By Scaling Back Catalogs, JC Penney to Save 30% on Paper
- Around the Web – Starbucks, EcoFactor, UPS, Brownfields, Eco-Labels
- Subaru Touts Energy & Environmental Initiatives
- U.S., China Partner on Renewable Energy, Energy Efficiency
- Green Buildings Do Double Duty: Reduce Energy Use, Lower Financial Risk
- UK to Ease Rules for On-Site Renewable Energy Installations
- Intel Eyes Wind, Electric Cars
- Nike Tops Annual Climate Action Scores
- Iranian Tanker Firm to Cut Fuel Use 28%
- Corporate Jetsetters Can be Carbon Offsetters
- USPS Energy Use Down 9% From 2005 to 2008
- From Solar Applications to Christmas, LEDs Light the Night
- EPA May Regulate Sulfur Dioxide Emissions on Hourly Basis
- MITEI: Sustainable Energy & Terawatt-Scale Photovoltaics
- Around the Web – Health Care & Energy, Shell, NBC
Charts [ see all ]
Popular Topics
Energy Efficiency
Data Center
Emissions
Facilities
Electricity
Sustainability
Water
Supply Chain
Efficiency
Green Marketing
Strategy & Leadership
Research
Fleets & Transportation
Carbon Finance
Conventional Energy
Clean Energy
Waste & Recycling
Paper & Packaging
Policy & Law
Utilities
Construction
Comments and Discussions
Trade Association on Trade Group on EPA Chemical Regs: ‘If Everything is a Priority, Then Nothing is a Priority’
"Seriously… that..."
Gary Markowitz on Supermarkets Tackle Emissions Reductions, Fuel Efficiency
"Supermarkets waste over 10 percent of their energy through improper..."
peter in ireland on Ontario May Follow California’s Lead on TV Energy Efficiency
"Governor Schwarzenegger is shooting himself in the foot! 1...."
Environmental Leader on S. America Takes Most Urgent View of Copenhagen Talks
"The survey respondents (the PDF report mentions 4,000 respondents in 38..."
Jake on UPS Trying New Hydraulic Hybrid Trucks
"A point of clarification: the Reuters press release referenced herein reports that 20 UPS will purchase..."
Custom Organic Shirts on S. America Takes Most Urgent View of Copenhagen Talks
"90% of North Americans believe it is urgent to get a global climate..."
peter dublin on California City’s Green Building Ordinance Applies to Commercial Buildings
"Why energy efficiebnt regulation on buildings –..."




Reader Comments
It is good to hear that fly ash and ground granulated blastfurnace slag is getting some long over due publicity. But unless there is something really special in this system, it does not appear to be a new application, these products have been used in the production of cement and concrete for many years. I certainly do not understand the claims related to GHG emmissions and feel that it is just another 21st Century marketing ploy. Please some one prove me wrong. The production of GGBS and PFA in itself must account for a tremendous amount of GHG. And while companies and others actively trade in Co2 Credits I for one fail to see why the GHG route has to be quoted for the use of these materials. Why cant it be promoted as a sound, sensible, technically advantageous, tried and tested application for the production of concrete. Which it is.
Peter Morton | July 30th, 2008
Its great to see we are doing are part to clean up the enviroment. One comment and it will probably get more producers to lean this way is Icrete charges a pretty hefty royalty to do mix optimization where companies like BASF and W.R Grace are doing this at no charge for customers. Good luck all….
Don Barber | July 31st, 2008
I was just browsing on line and checkin out icrete. I use it and it is easier dude. You dont even have to use much. and to Peter it is the easiest concrete i ever saw so why do u think its not new?
Charles Wolson | August 5th, 2008