August 19, 2008
GHG Reporting Practices Of Most Industries Overlook 75% Of Emissions
Researchers at Carnegie Mellon University are urging companies to broaden their carbon footprint calculations with a new method that estimates the amount of GHG emissions across all tiers of the entire supply chain for all industries.
Carbon footprints are typically reported in “tiers.” Tier one includes emissions by the company’s own activities. Tier two expands to include emissions from electricity and steam purchased by the company. Tier three includes all other emissions from the company’s entire supply chain of goods and services.
Companies usually opt to report only their tier one or tier two GHG emissions, but Carnegie Mellon researchers H. Scott Matthews, Chris T. Hendrickson, and Christopher L. Weber say two-thirds of U.S. industries would overlook 75 percent of GHG emissions if they continue to neglect reporting on tier three emissions.
“By far, most companies are pursuing very limited footprints — toe prints really— instead of comprehensive ones,” said Matthews in a statement.
The average industry has only 14 percent of its total greenhouse gas emissions in tier one and 12 percent in tier two for a total of 26 percent.
Advertisers
Stay competitive through sustainability.
Find out how at the SAP Sustainability Resource Center. >>
EFFECTIVELY MANAGE WATER COMPLIANCE
Understand how increased enforcement may affect your company. Find out more >>
EPA mandatory emissions reporting starts Jan 1st
CSA Standards can help your organization get ready for compliance. Find out how. >>
Join the Discussion
Recent Daily News [ see all ]
- 11/06/2009
- 11/05/2009
- 11/04/2009
- Emissions Intensity Falling Globally
- JohnsonDiversey Ups GHG Reduction Target to 25%
- Sainsbury’s Offers Free London Electric Car Charging
- Carbon Trading Could Trigger a ‘Sub-prime Style’ Economic Crash
- Peabody, Exxon Accused of Undermining Climate Talks
- BMW, Toyota, Ford Tout Eco-cars
- In ‘Apathy Gap,’ Energy Efficiency at Home Ranks Low
- China Pushes for CO2 Storage, Not Emissions Reductions
- Clean Tech VC Funding On Rebound, Up 50% Since 2nd Quarter
- IECC Building Code Recommendations Add Up to 30% in Energy Efficiency Gains
- Disney Buys $7M in Reforestation Offsets, a Corporate Record
- McKesson to Save $300K Via Fuel-Efficient Vehicles
- Sprint to Save $2.1M With Eco-Friendly Packaging
- U.S. Export-Import Bank Adopts Carbon Policy to Support Renewable Energy
- Greening the Automotive Supply Chain
- Yokohama Rubber Cuts GHG Emissions 13.4% in 2008
- Electronics Industry Lawsuit Called ‘Attack on States’ Rights’
- Wal-Mart Adding LEDs to 650 Stores
- One Committee Down for Senate Climate Bill, Five More to Go
- EU Poised to Give Heavy Industry Free Carbon Permits
- ResponsibleTravel.com Scuttles Carbon Offsetting Option
- U.S. Cap-and-Trade Creates Winners and Losers among Largest Emitters
- DOE Awards $155M to Make Industrial Sector More Energy Efficient
- System Upgrades Power Up Energy Savings for Hotels
- Xerox Cuts GHG Emissions by 20% from 2002
- Waste Management Landfill Gas Project Complete
- Intel, Pepsi, Kohl’s Stay Atop Green Power Partnership list
- Wal-Mart Thinks Big With Smaller Stores
- Despite Critics, Gore ‘Proud’ to Invest in Green Firms
- Metal Recyclers Spar Over Ship Recycling Site
Industry Voices [ see all ]
A Roadmap for a Renewable Energy Partnership
Brad Cashaw
Vice President
Quaker Foods and Snacks Supply Chain and Sustainability
Forest Carbon Core to Climate Change Deal
Chris Elliott
Forest Carbon Initiative Lead
World Wildlife Fund
VCS and CarbonFix Tops in Review of Forestry Carbon Standards
Paulo Lopes
Carbon Management Consultant
Carbon Clear







Reader Comments
The methodology used for calculating a company’s carbon footprint depends on what they are trying to measure. The Greenhouse Gas Protocol developed by the World Resources Institute and World Business Council on Sustainable Development is the standard for calculating a corporate footprint. Many companies chose to calculate Scope 1 and 2 emissions because these are the only emissions that can be accurately calculated or will be subject to any regulation, and the scope 3 emissions are someone else’s scope 1 or 2 emissions. A company wouldn’t construct an income statement using the income and expenditures of its buyers and suppliers. Why should it do this in carbon accounting?
Estimating the financial and greenhouse gas positions of buyers and suppliers is useful in understanding a firm’s exposure to the market and potential regulations. However, estimates have inherent inaccuracies. Companies which want to account for these scope 3 emissions should request that their buyers and suppliers conduct greenhouse gas inventories. Companies wishing to calculate the GHG generated over a product’s lifecycle should use the Supply Chain protocol at http://www.ghgprotocol.org
I found the Carnegie Mellon press release to be misguided and self-serving.
Juan | August 20th, 2008
I would have to agree with Juan’s comments. This press release from Carnegie is only making a “The Sky is Blue” statement. Not only would a companies buyers and suppliers have to report their Scope 1 and 2 emissions, but carve out the percentage of emissions for each customer. At which point, those emissions would become Scope 3.
David | August 22nd, 2008
This article incorrectly refers to the GHG Protocol’s “Tiers.” What the writer is actually referring to is Scope 1, 2, & 3. The Tiers, on the other hand, indicate the data quality. Higher Tiers mean more exact activity data is being used, lower Tiers mean that less accurate data is available.
Pablo | November 21st, 2008