In UK, Exporting Recovered Plastic Bottles, Paper To China Cuts Emissions

August 20, 2008

Email this story Print this post Add your comments

A study (PDF) published by Government-funded organization WRAP reveals that exporting recovered plastic bottles and paper to China produces less carbon emissions than landfilling them in the U.K. and replacing them with virgin materials., letsrecycle.com reports.

The study finds that the transportation of the goods accounts for under a third of the carbon savings created by recycling with further savings if reverse haulage is noted. Due to a trade imbalance between the U.K. and China, most of the containers return to China are empty.

Britain currently exports 4.7 million tons of recovered paper and 500,000 tons of plastic to China. According to WRAP this is because China has an increasing demand for plastic bottles while the U.K. did not have the capacity to reprocess them.

Between about 154 kg and 213 kg of CO2 is produced per ton of recycled paper transported, while one ton of recovered plastic bottles emits between 158kg and 230 kg.

Despite the findings, WRAP says the study did not show exporting materials was necessarily the most desirable option, citing the option to recycle domestically.

In July, political and business leaders in Britain warned that the country may face a sharp rise in its tax bill to fund the country’s move to a low carbon economy.

Email this story Print this post Add your comments

Advertisers

Enhance Sustainability. Improve Profitability.

Learn how at the SAP Sustainability Resource Center. >>

Unclear about the EPA's new GHG Rule?

Learn how it could affect your business. >>

EPA mandatory emissions reporting starts Jan 1st

CSA Standards can help your organization get ready for compliance. Find out how. >>

Product Environmental Compliance Best Practices

How to achieve compliance at a significantly lower cost. Download the full report. >>

Join the Discussion

Reader Comments

I heard that the Chinese have been paid to receive this waste and are in fact burning most of it! They think it very amusing that they should be paid to get rid of it.

Perhaps this is worth investigating

Best

Robin

Robin Cotterell | August 25th, 2008

Recent Daily News [ see all ]

11/20/2009
11/19/2009
11/18/2009

Charts [ see all ]

European Paper Industry Cuts CO2 Emissions by 42% since 1990

S. America Takes Most Urgent View of Copenhagen Talks

Nike Tops Annual Climate Action Scores

Oceans May Trap more Carbon than Forests

Jobs

View All Jobs >> Post a Job >>

Comments and Discussions

Trade Association on Trade Group on EPA Chemical Regs: ‘If Everything is a Priority, Then Nothing is a Priority’
"Seriously… that..."

Gary Markowitz on Supermarkets Tackle Emissions Reductions, Fuel Efficiency
"Supermarkets waste over 10 percent of their energy through improper..."

peter in ireland on Ontario May Follow California’s Lead on TV Energy Efficiency
"Governor Schwarzenegger is shooting himself in the foot! 1...."

Environmental Leader on S. America Takes Most Urgent View of Copenhagen Talks
"The survey respondents (the PDF report mentions 4,000 respondents in 38..."

Jake on UPS Trying New Hydraulic Hybrid Trucks
"A point of clarification: the Reuters press release referenced herein reports that 20 UPS will purchase..."

Custom Organic Shirts on S. America Takes Most Urgent View of Copenhagen Talks
"90% of North Americans believe it is urgent to get a global climate..."

peter dublin on California City’s Green Building Ordinance Applies to Commercial Buildings
"Why energy efficiebnt regulation on buildings –..."

Environmental Leader