Samsung Criticized for Lack of Recycling Programs
The Electronics TakeBack Coalition has launched a marketing campaign attacking Samsung for not taking environmental responsibility to recycle old electronics that may contain toxic metals, Media Post reports.
The campaign aims to make consumers aware of toxic metals used to manufacture TVs and other electronic devices before 2005, and to point consumers to the fact that Samsung has been spending millions on ad campaigns during the Olympic instead of funding a take-back program for potentially toxic components in older TVs.
The “Take Back My TV” campaign is on the coalition’s site, Metal Mania; a spoof of Samsung’s site Medal Mania. Both sites allow consumers to hunt for gold. But on the coalition’s site, consumers find toxic metals mercury and cadmium instead of the gold and prizes found on Samsung’s site.
In response Samsung said in a statement that it is piloting a TV take-back and recycling programs in 14 U.S. states, and that it also “has numerous take-back and recycle initiatives throughout the company.”
Samsung scored zero on climate change criteria in the 8th edition of “Guide to Greener Electronics” published by Greenpeace in June. But in the March edition of the guide, Samsung and Toshiba shared the top overall spot.
According to research from last summer, Samsung is perceived as one of the least green brands.
Stay Up-to-Date On Environmental Management, Energy & Sustainability News with EL's Free Daily Newsletter
Energy Manager News
- Helping Building Automation Grow
- Municipalities Could Combine Small Cell and LED Upgrades
- Holistic Approach to Energy Savings in Dublin, Ohio Schools
- NYC One Step Closer to Net-Zero Energy Goal at Wastewater Treatment Plants
- ‘Better Buildings, Better Plants’ Saves $2.4B Over Five Years
- Report Details Massive UK Energy Waste
- Embracing New Tech Is Key to Greater Energy Savings, Say Experts
- Johnson Controls, Hitachi Appliances Launch AC JV