Vattenfall Unveils ‘Almost Emissions-Free’ Power Plant

September 10, 2008

Email this story Print this post Add your comments

Vattenfall recently inaugurated a pilot coal-fired power station which it says, according to Forbes, is “almost emissions-free.” Environmentalists were unimpressed.

The carbon capture and storage system captures CO2 produced when fossil fuels are combusted, compresses it into liquid and then injects it underground. The method is quickly gaining interest in the EU.

The pilot unit has a thermal capacity of 30 megawatts and was constructed over the last 15 months at a cost of about €70 million.

However, environment groups criticized CCS with some calling it a facade, while others commented the technology would not be ready for the mass market by 2020.

“Vattenfall managers talk a lot about supposedly environmentally friendly coal power stations but they are still planning and building conventional coal-fired power stations with high levels of CO2 emissions,” BUND’s Energy Spokesman Thorben Becker told Forbes.

According to Greenpeace, CCS reduces 10 to 40 percent of the energy produced by coal-fired plants, signifying a greater amount of coal is needed to produce the same amount of energy.

In July, EPA proposed regulations on the injection of CO2 underground. The proposal is seeking permission for a new class of injection wells – Class VI – under the authority of the Safe Drinking Water Act’s Underground Injection Control program.

Email this story Print this post Add your comments

Advertisers

Make sustainability part of your strategy.

Get equipped at the SAP Sustainability Resource Center. >>

Unclear about the EPA's new GHG Rule?

Learn how it could affect your business. >>

EPA mandatory emissions reporting starts Jan 1st

CSA Standards can help your organization get ready for compliance. Find out how. >>

Product Environmental Compliance Best Practices

How to achieve compliance at a significantly lower cost. Download the full report. >>

Join the Discussion

Reader Comments

The ability to manage GHG is the topic of this century. There are ways in which this can be accomplished. unfortunately the leverage of the methods mentioned most often, geologic sequestration into the earth, has place all other methods on the back burner. This will be the undoing of technological advancements in the industry. We use algae for this purpose. We get feedback in all areas of our technology, some good some bad. But how will this technology advance when the industry seems so determined to focus on one technology and one only. And in my humble opinion that technology is an ecological disaster waiting to happen. And when they use the method for EOR it is a false statement to say they are sequestering anything.

chris schuring | February 23rd, 2009

Recent Daily News [ see all ]

11/20/2009
11/19/2009
11/18/2009

Charts [ see all ]

European Paper Industry Cuts CO2 Emissions by 42% since 1990

S. America Takes Most Urgent View of Copenhagen Talks

Nike Tops Annual Climate Action Scores

Oceans May Trap more Carbon than Forests

Jobs

View All Jobs >> Post a Job >>

Comments and Discussions

Trade Association on Trade Group on EPA Chemical Regs: ‘If Everything is a Priority, Then Nothing is a Priority’
"Seriously… that..."

Gary Markowitz on Supermarkets Tackle Emissions Reductions, Fuel Efficiency
"Supermarkets waste over 10 percent of their energy through improper..."

peter in ireland on Ontario May Follow California’s Lead on TV Energy Efficiency
"Governor Schwarzenegger is shooting himself in the foot! 1...."

Environmental Leader on S. America Takes Most Urgent View of Copenhagen Talks
"The survey respondents (the PDF report mentions 4,000 respondents in 38..."

Jake on UPS Trying New Hydraulic Hybrid Trucks
"A point of clarification: the Reuters press release referenced herein reports that 20 UPS will purchase..."

Custom Organic Shirts on S. America Takes Most Urgent View of Copenhagen Talks
"90% of North Americans believe it is urgent to get a global climate..."

peter dublin on California City’s Green Building Ordinance Applies to Commercial Buildings
"Why energy efficiebnt regulation on buildings –..."

Environmental Leader