<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: HP To Double Renewable Power, Dell Says &#8216;Good First Step&#8217;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.environmentalleader.com/2008/10/21/hp-to-double-renewable-power-dell-says-good-first-step/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.environmentalleader.com/2008/10/21/hp-to-double-renewable-power-dell-says-good-first-step/</link>
	<description>Environmental Leader</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 22:05:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trent Bigelow</title>
		<link>http://www.environmentalleader.com/2008/10/21/hp-to-double-renewable-power-dell-says-good-first-step/comment-page-1/#comment-91298</link>
		<dc:creator>Trent Bigelow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 20:54:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.environmentalleader.com/2008/10/21/hp-to-double-renewable-power-dell-says-good-first-step/#comment-91298</guid>
		<description>I applaud both brands for even making being carbon neutral a priority.  However, despite Dell&#039;s smart self-inferring response to HP&#039;s move, Dell fails to keep in perspective the substantial difference in scope of the two companies&#039; operations and in turn footprint.  HP has made a longterm commitment long before Dell on the recycling/take-back fronts, and energy efficiency.  HP seems to focus on the reductions before the offsets.  Offsets are great and have their purpose - a means to price in the pollution into the cost of doing business, which would otherwise be omitted from the balance sheet as an externality.  HP was also the first OEM to acheive EPEAT Gold status for several of its machines.  See more:  http://www.epeat.net/SearchResults.aspx?ProductType=1&amp;rating=3</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I applaud both brands for even making being carbon neutral a priority.  However, despite Dell&#8217;s smart self-inferring response to HP&#8217;s move, Dell fails to keep in perspective the substantial difference in scope of the two companies&#8217; operations and in turn footprint.  HP has made a longterm commitment long before Dell on the recycling/take-back fronts, and energy efficiency.  HP seems to focus on the reductions before the offsets.  Offsets are great and have their purpose &#8211; a means to price in the pollution into the cost of doing business, which would otherwise be omitted from the balance sheet as an externality.  HP was also the first OEM to acheive EPEAT Gold status for several of its machines.  See more:  <a href="http://www.epeat.net/SearchResults.aspx?ProductType=1&#038;rating=3" rel="nofollow">http://www.epeat.net/SearchResults.aspx?ProductType=1&#038;rating=3</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

