<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Smithfield Foods Nabs McDonald&#8217;s Sustainable Supplier Award</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.environmentalleader.com/2008/10/23/smithfield-foods-nabs-mcdonalds-sustainable-supplier-award/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.environmentalleader.com/2008/10/23/smithfield-foods-nabs-mcdonalds-sustainable-supplier-award/</link>
	<description>Environmental Leader</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 17:25:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lee</title>
		<link>http://www.environmentalleader.com/2008/10/23/smithfield-foods-nabs-mcdonalds-sustainable-supplier-award/comment-page-1/#comment-82300</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 18:48:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.environmentalleader.com/2008/10/23/smithfield-foods-nabs-mcdonalds-sustainable-supplier-award/#comment-82300</guid>
		<description>Smithfield foods?  Weren&#039;t they smacked with one of the bigggest lawsuits in EPA history about ten years ago and weren&#039;t they on record for saying that they&#039;d rather spend more on court costs fighting EPA than spend anything on pollution prevention?  And is a 7% reduction in NOVs really something to be proud of?  How about getting ZERO NOVs?  And their solid waste generation has gone UP 46%?  What am I missing here?  
Are they really the BEST supplier McDonald&#039;s could find?  sheesh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Smithfield foods?  Weren&#8217;t they smacked with one of the bigggest lawsuits in EPA history about ten years ago and weren&#8217;t they on record for saying that they&#8217;d rather spend more on court costs fighting EPA than spend anything on pollution prevention?  And is a 7% reduction in NOVs really something to be proud of?  How about getting ZERO NOVs?  And their solid waste generation has gone UP 46%?  What am I missing here?<br />
Are they really the BEST supplier McDonald&#8217;s could find?  sheesh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

