Sustainability is Not a Color – Sustainability is Transparent.
Green was an obvious color to hang the environmental renaissance on. It was a reclaiming of the old pejorative â€śgreeniesâ€ť and â€śtreehuggers.â€ť Both of those terms have been reclaimed by the fringe, but then quickly co-opted on the mainstream as a movement. From green-collar jobs to green-washing and from green-tech to green-building, thereâ€™s no shortage of using the color as a shortcut to simply imply sustainability.
And thatâ€™s exactly what it is. A visual shortcut. UPS: Brown. DHL: Yellow. FedEx: Orange and Purple. These, of course, are shortcuts to brand understanding. But Green doesnâ€™t enjoy the luxury of consistency behind the brand. Itâ€™s a thin varnish on top of a vast array of brands and ideas.
Colors donâ€™t work well for movements. The movement might get moving around a color, but it wonâ€™t get far relying on a color. And shortcuts, like coal or fossil fuels, donâ€™t get us there the right way either.
Some nouveau-environmentalist and entrepreneurial ad agencies are trying to re-brand (a move akin to dogs marking territory) the environmental movement as â€śblue.â€ť â€śBlue is the new Green,â€ť they say. One argument goes that â€śthe earth is mostly water, the sky is mostly blue,â€ť so Blue is the best natural color of a deeper level of business-driven environmental movement. Some even claim this shift to be one of the greatest marketing trends of the coming year. Ultimately, it is nothing more than a new flavor of vanilla ice cream. It is a skipping stone, superficial and doomed to sink.
The recent flock of businesses to use green as a primary logo color, trademark or patent has been just short of deluge. Over 300,000 green trademarks were filed with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office in 2007. Will we see the same rush to re-brand as blue? Doubtful. People are smarter than to fall for what amounts to little more than a bait and switch con.
Color wars serve to derail a movement, not push it forward.
Colors are not things. Colors are not ideas. Colors are not solutions. Colors are shortcuts. Colors are brand strategies not branded solutions.
True sustainability does not need color. Cultural theorist Marshall McLuhan said that, â€śmud sometimes gives the illusion of depth.â€ťÂ Same goes for Green or Blue.Â They offer the illusion of sustainability, the spectacle of sustainability.
Sustainability is transparent, void of obscuring color.Â It is clear, open, and visible.Â Sustainability is naked.
John Rooks is the President/Founder of The SOAP Group (Sustainable Organization Advocacy Partners) – an advocacy company developing sustainability communication programs for corporations, start-ups, non-profits, traditional ad agencies and all the crevices in between.
Energy Manager News
- New York Stateâ€™s Summer of Energy
- Chicago Church Strives for Energy Efficiency
- Small, Medium Size Commercial Building Efficiency Market to Grow
- ERC: Price Benchmark Trends Week Ending June 24, 2016
- FERC Rules Against Tri-State Fee on Local Renewable Power
- Marin Clean Energy to Reduce Rates and Expand Service Area in September
- Drama Aside, Teslaâ€™s Acquisition of SolarCity Makes Sense
- SunPower Solar Technology Breaks 24% Energy Efficiency Mark