Related topics:
Recommend this:
This summer, the EPA issued an “advanced notice of proposed rulemaking” that called for public comments on the idea of regulating GHG emissions. The comment period ended last week but before that farmers were lobbying fiercely against a “cow tax” which would tax them for the methane that livestock emit, New York Times Reports.
Last week, the New York Farm Bureau issued a statement (PDF) saying that such a tax could reach $175 per cow, $87.50 per head of beef cattle and upwards of $20 per hog. The bureau says the new law may require any operation with more than 25 dairy cows, 50 beef cattle or 200 hogs to obtain permits, and would cover more than 90 percent of dairy, beef and hog production in New York.
The Department of Agriculture commented that even small farms and ranches would run up against a proposed 100-ton limit on emissions. DOA says the American agricultural landscape is comprised of 1.9 million farms with an average value of production of about $25,600 on 271 acres and would not be able to bear the regulatory compliance costs that would be involved with the new tax.
Similar livestock taxes were proposed in New Zealand and Estonia but Plenty magazine notes the plans were shelved due to widespread protests.
CattleNetwork recently reported that dairy’s carbon foot print has dropped to 12 pounds per gallon in 2007, from 31 pounds in 1944.
In September, Dairy UK reported that some UK farmers have put their cows on a special diet in order to reduce GHG emissions.
Numerous organizations - including the Energy Trust of Oregon - are finding ways to turn waste into energy. The Environmental Credit Corporation has been involved in a program to install manure lagoon covers.
Last year in California, a commission detailed a report on how dairy farms could reduce emissions.
CUTTING COMPLIANCE COSTS-CAN YOU AFFORD NOT TO?
Implement a cost effective compliance management program. Find out how. >>
ENTERPRISE EHS COMPLIANCE SOLUTION
Globally manage EHS initiatives - locally execute compliance programs. >>
In a study of consumer opinions of marketing claims, survey respondents identified most ...
click to view full size chart »
For most organizations today, sophisticated carbon management is simply not possible. At best, ... continue »
Comments
While I’m all for doing what we can to ensure our environment is safe, I’m not convinced that blaming global warming entirely on mankind is sound science. One of my biggest fears is that unfettered regulation will simply have a devastating effect on our economies and our way of life. The idea of burdening farmers with nonsensical regulation is ludicrous. One size regulation does not fit all. While some things may be done with so-called factory farms, run by deep pocket conglomerates, the family farm will not only suffer but die out altogether. We need to get a grip on the global warming hysteria before it’s too late.
Glennis December 4th, 2008This tax doesn’t make sense. No matter how much you tax each cow, they are still going to poop. This sounds like the wheels have been set in motion for big business to take over the cattle industry. We will no longer to be able to hold onto our small family farms that have been passed down for generations. How very sad for tax paying, loyal, salt-of-the-Earth American citizens to be treated so heartlessly by those we have chosen to represent us.
Debby June 16th, 2009