December 3, 2008
Farmers Against Proposed ‘Cow Tax’
This summer, the EPA issued an “advanced notice of proposed rulemaking” that called for public comments on the idea of regulating GHG emissions. The comment period ended last week but before that farmers were lobbying fiercely against a “cow tax” which would tax them for the methane that livestock emit, New York Times Reports.
Last week, the New York Farm Bureau issued a statement (PDF) saying that such a tax could reach $175 per cow, $87.50 per head of beef cattle and upwards of $20 per hog. The bureau says the new law may require any operation with more than 25 dairy cows, 50 beef cattle or 200 hogs to obtain permits, and would cover more than 90 percent of dairy, beef and hog production in New York.
The Department of Agriculture commented that even small farms and ranches would run up against a proposed 100-ton limit on emissions. DOA says the American agricultural landscape is comprised of 1.9 million farms with an average value of production of about $25,600 on 271 acres and would not be able to bear the regulatory compliance costs that would be involved with the new tax.
Similar livestock taxes were proposed in New Zealand and Estonia but Plenty magazine notes the plans were shelved due to widespread protests.
CattleNetwork recently reported that dairy’s carbon foot print has dropped to 12 pounds per gallon in 2007, from 31 pounds in 1944.
In September, Dairy UK reported that some UK farmers have put their cows on a special diet in order to reduce GHG emissions.
Numerous organizations – including the Energy Trust of Oregon – are finding ways to turn waste into energy. The Environmental Credit Corporation has been involved in a program to install manure lagoon covers.
Last year in California, a commission detailed a report on how dairy farms could reduce emissions.
Advertisers
Stay competitive through sustainability.
Find out how at the SAP Sustainability Resource Center. >>
Unclear about the EPA's new GHG Rule?
Learn how it could affect your business. >>
EPA mandatory emissions reporting starts Jan 1st
CSA Standards can help your organization get ready for compliance. Find out how. >>
Product Environmental Compliance Best Practices
How to achieve compliance at a significantly lower cost. Download the full report. >>
Join the Discussion
Recent Daily News [ see all ]
- 11/20/2009
- 11/19/2009
- 11/18/2009
- Ontario May Follow California’s Lead on TV Energy Efficiency
- EPA Is One Step Closer to New Ship Emissions Standards
- European Paper Industry Cuts CO2 Emissions by 42% since 1990
- CDP Launches Water Disclosure Project
- Whirlpool Cuts Water Use by Nearly 22% from 2004 to 2008
- National Grid Again Rejects High Costs of Offshore Wind
- California City’s Green Building Ordinance Applies to Commercial Buildings
- Agilent To Save $3.5M Over 10 Years With Solar
- S. America Takes Most Urgent View of Copenhagen Talks
- Texas, China Wind Partners May Build U.S. Factory to Appease Critical Lawmaker
- Volvo, Mack Engines First to Meet 2010 EPA Emissions Standards
- Around the Web – Nike, Google, Nissan, Bush’s Green Library, WWF
- Fossil Fuel Emissions Rose 29% since 2000
- SEC Charges Four in ‘Green’ Investment Ponzi Scheme
- No Sunny Skies for Two Solar Projects in Texas, California
- Canada Delays GHG Emissions Regs, Russia Ups Emissions Cuts
- News Corp. Taps Hara for Energy Efficiency, Environmental Management
- Rising Sea Levels Would Hit U.S. East Coast Hardest
- Building an Energy-Efficient Data Center Using Virtualization Technology
- Trade Group on EPA Chemical Regs: ‘If Everything is a Priority, Then Nothing is a Priority’
- A/V Equipment Gets New Energy Star Requirements
- By Scaling Back Catalogs, JC Penney to Save 30% on Paper
- Around the Web – Starbucks, EcoFactor, UPS, Brownfields, Eco-Labels
- Subaru Touts Energy & Environmental Initiatives
- U.S., China Partner on Renewable Energy, Energy Efficiency
- Green Buildings Do Double Duty: Reduce Energy Use, Lower Financial Risk
- UK to Ease Rules for On-Site Renewable Energy Installations
- Intel Eyes Wind, Electric Cars
- Nike Tops Annual Climate Action Scores
- Iranian Tanker Firm to Cut Fuel Use 28%
- Corporate Jetsetters Can be Carbon Offsetters
- USPS Energy Use Down 9% From 2005 to 2008
- From Solar Applications to Christmas, LEDs Light the Night
- EPA May Regulate Sulfur Dioxide Emissions on Hourly Basis
- MITEI: Sustainable Energy & Terawatt-Scale Photovoltaics
- Around the Web – Health Care & Energy, Shell, NBC
Charts [ see all ]
Popular Topics
Energy Efficiency
Data Center
Emissions
Facilities
Electricity
Sustainability
Water
Supply Chain
Efficiency
Green Marketing
Strategy & Leadership
Research
Fleets & Transportation
Carbon Finance
Conventional Energy
Clean Energy
Waste & Recycling
Paper & Packaging
Policy & Law
Utilities
Construction
Comments and Discussions
Trade Association on Trade Group on EPA Chemical Regs: ‘If Everything is a Priority, Then Nothing is a Priority’
"Seriously… that..."
Gary Markowitz on Supermarkets Tackle Emissions Reductions, Fuel Efficiency
"Supermarkets waste over 10 percent of their energy through improper..."
peter in ireland on Ontario May Follow California’s Lead on TV Energy Efficiency
"Governor Schwarzenegger is shooting himself in the foot! 1...."
Environmental Leader on S. America Takes Most Urgent View of Copenhagen Talks
"The survey respondents (the PDF report mentions 4,000 respondents in 38..."
Jake on UPS Trying New Hydraulic Hybrid Trucks
"A point of clarification: the Reuters press release referenced herein reports that 20 UPS will purchase..."
Custom Organic Shirts on S. America Takes Most Urgent View of Copenhagen Talks
"90% of North Americans believe it is urgent to get a global climate..."
peter dublin on California City’s Green Building Ordinance Applies to Commercial Buildings
"Why energy efficiebnt regulation on buildings –..."




Reader Comments
While I’m all for doing what we can to ensure our environment is safe, I’m not convinced that blaming global warming entirely on mankind is sound science. One of my biggest fears is that unfettered regulation will simply have a devastating effect on our economies and our way of life. The idea of burdening farmers with nonsensical regulation is ludicrous. One size regulation does not fit all. While some things may be done with so-called factory farms, run by deep pocket conglomerates, the family farm will not only suffer but die out altogether. We need to get a grip on the global warming hysteria before it’s too late.
Glennis | December 4th, 2008
This tax doesn’t make sense. No matter how much you tax each cow, they are still going to poop. This sounds like the wheels have been set in motion for big business to take over the cattle industry. We will no longer to be able to hold onto our small family farms that have been passed down for generations. How very sad for tax paying, loyal, salt-of-the-Earth American citizens to be treated so heartlessly by those we have chosen to represent us.
Debby | June 16th, 2009