California Says Yes To Tougher GHG Rules, Cap-and-Trade

December 13, 2008

Email this story Print this post Add your comments

The California Air Resources Board voted unanimously to adopt the nation’s most sweeping plan to reduce GHG emissions. It is outlining for the first time a plan to implement the Global Warming Solutions Act, which mandates that the state cut emissions by a third, or to 1990 levels, by 2020.

An important component of the plan is a cap-and-trade program covering 85 percent of the state’s emissions. The program will be developed in conjunction with the Western Climate Initiative.

New York Times reported that the Environmental Law and Climate Change Law blog says some sectors, such as aircraft and airports, are missing from the plan’s reduction targets.

The Sacramento Bee reported that some economists say the plan underestimates the costs involved in transforming the state’s modes of transportation, its energy sources and its industries.

Reuters reported that Californian companies are concerned that rising electricity and other costs will put them out of business. California Hispanic Chambers of Commerce Legislative Affairs Chairman James Duran told Reuters that the plan “is an economic train wreck waiting to happen.”

In November, the air board announced its draft plan to tackle climate change. The plan includes allowing business to buy and sell emission credits and raising water fees to between $100 million and $500 million annually to name a few.

A poll conducted earlier this year found that the bill is popular until people learn how much it could end up costing them.

On the other hand, some environmentalists are disappointed with California’s proposed carbon plans, noting that regulators have yet to devise any structure for their proposed cap and trade program.

Email this story Print this post Add your comments

Advertisers

Make sustainability part of your strategy.

Get equipped at the SAP Sustainability Resource Center. >>

Unclear about the EPA's new GHG Rule?

Learn how it could affect your business. >>

EPA mandatory emissions reporting starts Jan 1st

CSA Standards can help your organization get ready for compliance. Find out how. >>

Best Practices: Product Environmental Compliance

How to achieve compliance at a significantly lower cost. Download the full report. >>

Join the Discussion

Reader Comments

America’s Untapped Energy Resource: Boosting Efficiency – TIME This is one that needs to be pushed to the Obama group. This is what is going I believe make a big difference in our country, by creating work and stimulating the economy. This country still wastes too much energy. And what we waste, we buy, from where? Natural gas energy is hardly talked about except by Mr. Pickens. The problem with his program is he is not pushing natural gas energy savings either. 20% or more of all natural gas is blown up the chimney as HOT exhaust. It is wasted. This has to stop. Natural gas has always been the clean fuel, the cheap clean fuel. Why worry about how much of this fuel we are wasting. Guess what? Natural gas prices are starting to increase. If you company is wanting to reduce it’s greenhouse gas emissions, for every decatherm of energy recovered from these waste exhaust gases, 118 lbs of CO2 will not be emitted into the atmosphere.
Who uses natural gas? Food and beverage processors. Textiles. Pharmaceuticals and our chemical plants.Now lets heat our buildings. Schools, Universities, Hospitals, prisons ( but maybe there we should turn the heat off) shopping centers, where we work, hotels and resorts. Natural gas heats the buildings, it heats the domestic or process water, it makes steam for industry, it heats the university or hotel swimming pool. Natural gas is an essential fuel that we really should not waste. The technology of “condensing flue gas heat recovery” is designed to recover most of that waste energy before it is lost into the atmosphere. But we have to teach people how to use it efficiently.
If this country could increase it’s natural gas energy efficiency by 5, 10, 15, 20%, how many more years of natural gas would we have left in the ground for our grandchildren and great, great grandchildren to have available to keep them comfortable?
I look forward to your reply

Sid | January 9th, 2009

Recent Daily News [ see all ]

11/20/2009
11/19/2009
11/18/2009

Charts [ see all ]

European Paper Industry Cuts CO2 Emissions by 42% since 1990

S. America Takes Most Urgent View of Copenhagen Talks

Nike Tops Annual Climate Action Scores

Oceans May Trap more Carbon than Forests

Jobs

View All Jobs >> Post a Job >>

Comments and Discussions

Trade Association on Trade Group on EPA Chemical Regs: ‘If Everything is a Priority, Then Nothing is a Priority’
"Seriously… that..."

Gary Markowitz on Supermarkets Tackle Emissions Reductions, Fuel Efficiency
"Supermarkets waste over 10 percent of their energy through improper..."

peter in ireland on Ontario May Follow California’s Lead on TV Energy Efficiency
"Governor Schwarzenegger is shooting himself in the foot! 1...."

Environmental Leader on S. America Takes Most Urgent View of Copenhagen Talks
"The survey respondents (the PDF report mentions 4,000 respondents in 38..."

Jake on UPS Trying New Hydraulic Hybrid Trucks
"A point of clarification: the Reuters press release referenced herein reports that 20 UPS will purchase..."

Custom Organic Shirts on S. America Takes Most Urgent View of Copenhagen Talks
"90% of North Americans believe it is urgent to get a global climate..."

peter dublin on California City’s Green Building Ordinance Applies to Commercial Buildings
"Why energy efficiebnt regulation on buildings –..."

Environmental Leader