December 19, 2008

CSR Reporting Efforts: Electronics, Financial, and Metals

Bookmark and Share Email this story Print this post Add your comments

The Roberts Environmental Center of Claremont McKenna College released new Pacific Sustainability Index scores on the environmental and social reporting for the financial, electronics and metals sectors.

It scores companies based on the reporting, intent, and performance of environmental and social sustainability efforts.

In the electronics, semincoductor, and peripherals sector (pdf), Japanese brands Panasonic and Sony stood out, receiving “A+”s from the center and ranking above Toshiba and Royal Philips Electronics. (See image above.)

Rockwell Animation was the only US brand to rank in the top 10 – most US companies received grades in D and F range. Still, Rockwell had the highest social reporting scores, along with Philips,Toshiba, and Electrolux.

In the segment, “accountability” and “social demographic” were the most frequent environmental and social reporting topics, respectively, with “water” and “human rights” the most frequent performance topics, respectively.

Among banks, insurance, and diversified financial companies (pdf), Barclays (UK), Santanger Central Hispano (Spain), Citigroup (US), and Mizuho Financial Group (Japan) all received grades in the “A” range.

DZ Bank (Germany) and the Industrial and Commercial Bank of China both received “F”s. The most amount of companies reported on energy performance in their sustainability reports.

In the 2006 reports on the metals sector (pdf), Rio Tinto Alcan (Canada) and Posco (South Korea) got “A+”s and Norway’s Norsk Hyrdo and the US company Alcoa trailed. Chinese companies Baosteel Group and China Minmetals were among the lowest scorers, just below US companies Nucor, Mueller Industries, and Aleris International.

Nippon Steel (Japan) stated high numerical goals, improved topics from its previous report, and was among those with the best performance reporting.

Bookmark and Share Email this story Print this post Add your comments

Advertisers

Join the Discussion

Reader Comments

Thats great that these companies are keeping control of their wasted product. Well, some of them at least.

What is the highest possible score? Is an A+ relative, or were there actual parameters for each grade?

Get EL Daily in your inbox, subscribe to free newsletter

Recent Daily News [ see all ]

  • 02/09/2010
  • 02/08/2010
  • 02/05/2010

Recent Jobs

Post a Job
Jobs powered by Simply Hired

Comments and Discussions

John Bergdoll on Accidental to Purposeful Sustainability: Using What You Already Have to Grow Sustainability
"I was following the logic your article..."

Liz Amason on Clorox Comes Clean With Chemical Content on Web Site
"But look at their ingredients listings. For example, their regular liquid bleach..."

Rigidflexibility on Companies Going Green Should Ignore Green Consumer
"I was about to market a metal working fluid that is 98>% Soybean oil and..."

Stuart on Canadian Environment Minister Denounces Quebec Vehicle Emissions Regs
"Canadians have been waiting for the feds to act on climate change for..."

Steve Wolford on Sports Teams Embrace Sustainability
"Hello Environmental Leader, We just returned from the National Sport Forum in Baltimore. Team and..."

Mauibrad on Bipartisan Senatorial Effort Seeks Cap and Trade for non-CO2 Emissions
"Finally some enlightened ideas out of Congress!"

Cameron Green on Data Centers Can Apply for Energy Star Rating in June
"I did a blog post about this. Essentially PUE doesn’t give you very much..."