December 31, 2008
WSJ Slams Dell Over Carbon Neutral Claim
The Wall Street Journal has slammed Dell over the announcement it made back in August about reaching its carbon neutral goal.
The problem, according to WSJ, is that Dell only counts the “emissions produced by its boilers and company-owned cars, its buildings’ electricity use, and its employees’ business air travel.”
It doesn’t count all the emissions associated with Dell: “All the emissions produced by its suppliers and consumers each amount to about 10 times the footprint Dell has defined for itself. That means the company is only neutralizing about 5% of the greenhouse gases that go into the making and use of its products,” the article states.
The carbon neutral trend started around 2003. But after Fiji Water’s “carbon negative” goal was criticized for pushing the bounds of credibility, many companies scaled back such announcements. But that’s not stopping all companies – Vattenfall announced a carbon neutral goal in October and, in June, Marks & Spencer set a goal to be carbon neutral by 2012.
In one of the boldest carbon neutral announcements made, Swiss Re, in April, bought and decommissioned emission reduction certificates equivalent to 230,000 tons of CO2 emissions, which the company claimed offset its entire emissions since October 2003. With this measure, Swiss Re said it had been carbon neutral since October 2003.
Google and Yahoo have also announced carbon neutral plans.
The WSJ article also calls out Dell for mostly purchasing renewable energy credits in order to make the carbon neutral claim and raises questions about the legitimacy of RECs. Dell hired ICF International to review some of its planned REC purchases and confirm their legitimacy, but neither ICF nor Dell would release the report to WSJ. (In April, ICF partnered with Merrill Lynch and launched “Green & Gold,” which the companies describe as a “full-service climate change solution with a strong focus on sustainability.”)
With so many companies announcing carbon neutral goals based primarily on purchasing carbon offsets, David Douglas, chief sustainability officer at Sun Microsystems, wondered how long it would be before a company announced it was going “double carbon neutral.”
What’s needed, according to Pankaj Bhatia, a policy expert at the World Resources Institute, is a carbon neutral standard.
Bill Burtis, spokesman for Clean Air-Cool Planet, says Dell’s carbon neutral announcement could lead consumers to believe “that buying a Dell computer means they’re not contributing to climate change at all.”
Advertisers
Stay competitive through sustainability.
Find out how at the SAP Sustainability Resource Center. >>
Unclear about the EPA's new GHG Rule?
Learn how it could affect your business. >>
EPA mandatory emissions reporting starts Jan 1st
CSA Standards can help your organization get ready for compliance. Find out how. >>
Best Practices: Product Environmental Compliance
How to achieve compliance at a significantly lower cost. Download the full report. >>
Join the Discussion
Recent Daily News [ see all ]
- 11/20/2009
- 11/19/2009
- 11/18/2009
- Ontario May Follow California’s Lead on TV Energy Efficiency
- EPA Is One Step Closer to New Ship Emissions Standards
- European Paper Industry Cuts CO2 Emissions by 42% since 1990
- CDP Launches Water Disclosure Project
- Whirlpool Cuts Water Use by Nearly 22% from 2004 to 2008
- National Grid Again Rejects High Costs of Offshore Wind
- California City’s Green Building Ordinance Applies to Commercial Buildings
- Agilent To Save $3.5M Over 10 Years With Solar
- S. America Takes Most Urgent View of Copenhagen Talks
- Texas, China Wind Partners May Build U.S. Factory to Appease Critical Lawmaker
- Volvo, Mack Engines First to Meet 2010 EPA Emissions Standards
- Around the Web – Nike, Google, Nissan, Bush’s Green Library, WWF
- Fossil Fuel Emissions Rose 29% since 2000
- SEC Charges Four in ‘Green’ Investment Ponzi Scheme
- No Sunny Skies for Two Solar Projects in Texas, California
- Canada Delays GHG Emissions Regs, Russia Ups Emissions Cuts
- News Corp. Taps Hara for Energy Efficiency, Environmental Management
- Rising Sea Levels Would Hit U.S. East Coast Hardest
- Building an Energy-Efficient Data Center Using Virtualization Technology
- Trade Group on EPA Chemical Regs: ‘If Everything is a Priority, Then Nothing is a Priority’
- A/V Equipment Gets New Energy Star Requirements
- By Scaling Back Catalogs, JC Penney to Save 30% on Paper
- Around the Web – Starbucks, EcoFactor, UPS, Brownfields, Eco-Labels
- Subaru Touts Energy & Environmental Initiatives
- U.S., China Partner on Renewable Energy, Energy Efficiency
- Green Buildings Do Double Duty: Reduce Energy Use, Lower Financial Risk
- UK to Ease Rules for On-Site Renewable Energy Installations
- Intel Eyes Wind, Electric Cars
- Nike Tops Annual Climate Action Scores
- Iranian Tanker Firm to Cut Fuel Use 28%
- Corporate Jetsetters Can be Carbon Offsetters
- USPS Energy Use Down 9% From 2005 to 2008
- From Solar Applications to Christmas, LEDs Light the Night
- EPA May Regulate Sulfur Dioxide Emissions on Hourly Basis
- MITEI: Sustainable Energy & Terawatt-Scale Photovoltaics
- Around the Web – Health Care & Energy, Shell, NBC
Charts [ see all ]
Popular Topics
Energy Efficiency
Data Center
Emissions
Facilities
Electricity
Sustainability
Water
Supply Chain
Efficiency
Green Marketing
Strategy & Leadership
Research
Fleets & Transportation
Carbon Finance
Conventional Energy
Clean Energy
Waste & Recycling
Paper & Packaging
Policy & Law
Utilities
Construction
Comments and Discussions
Environmental Leader on S. America Takes Most Urgent View of Copenhagen Talks
"The survey respondents (the PDF report mentions 4,000 respondents in 38..."
Jake on UPS Trying New Hydraulic Hybrid Trucks
"A point of clarification: the Reuters press release referenced herein reports that 20 UPS will purchase..."
Custom Organic Shirts on S. America Takes Most Urgent View of Copenhagen Talks
"90% of North Americans believe it is urgent to get a global climate..."
peter dublin on California City’s Green Building Ordinance Applies to Commercial Buildings
"Why energy efficiebnt regulation on buildings –..."
JEONG CHUN PHUOC on EU Poised to Give Heavy Industry Free Carbon Permits
"“Competitive Intelligence in Environmenting : A Holistic Deal for..."
Philip Vandenberg on Building an Energy-Efficient Data Center Using Virtualization Technology
"Rob has implemented many best practices for data centres..."
George Hoguet on Rising Sea Levels Would Hit U.S. East Coast Hardest
"Want to add some pressure into the system? Check out the Facebook group -NO TV..."




Reader Comments
Come on guys. As someone who knows Environmental Leader, Dell and the WSJ fairly well, I believe there is a more balanced tone here. Carbon neutrality is a great directional goal and an even better “tagline,” but all of us know that it’s not even close to being perfect in today’s application.
The WSJ didn’t “slam” Dell – I read the article and it was fairly balanced. Today, you can work hard to reduce emissions, but anyone claiming neutrality is buying credits or finding ways to offset. I’m not “slamming,” I’m just telling the truth.
Dell worked hard and spent $ to reach their claim of carbon neutrality. The WSJ pointed out what that really means and shed some light on the appropriate skeptisim that comes with carbon neutrality claims.
We are all in this boat together so let’s figure out what’s next. I think you’ll see claims of carbon negative before you see claims of double carbon neutrality.
Dave Stangis | January 2nd, 2009
There is little way any company can become carbon neutral without purchasing credits. There should be no issue with people purchasing credits to go carbon neutral, after all it is a voluntary iniative and if the credit structure is correct it will actually be investment in technologies which reduce GHG emissions.
I also fundamentally disagree with the criticism leveled at companies like Dell who don’t include their supply chains. Firstly, the scope of work required to do this would probably be 10 times the amount than measuring, reducing and offsetting their own emissions, and quite frankly, why should Dell be required to take responsibility for someone elses emissions. The model should be market driven, with Dell committed to supplier partnerships with other carbon neutral companies. That way the onus is on the supply chain to actually undertake a project which is of environmental benefit.
Roger Kerrison | January 7th, 2009