EDF Calls EPA Nanoscale Reporting Program ‘A Failure’

January 16, 2009

Email this story Print this post Add your comments

The voluntary nanomaterials reporting system used by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency is a failure, according to the Environmental Defense Fund (EDF).

The EPA launched the Nanoscale Materials Stewardship Program over a year ago in attempts to identify and collect data regarding the nanomaterials currently being used by manufacturers in the U.S.

However, a new report released by the EPA says that they’ve received information on less than 100 nanomaterials, though they believe that there are over 1000 in use.

Nanomaterials behave differently than other materials and can have effects on both human health and the environment. Because the EPA’s reporting program was voluntary, however, many companies simply did not submit information. In addition, they have no way of knowing whether or not the data they did collect is complete. Many companies refused data reporting, claiming that the information the EPA want is confidential business information.

Only four companies – Selah Technologies, Inc., SouthWest NanoTechnologies, Inc., Swan Chemicals Inc., and Unidym – have agreed to voluntary testing based on what they’ve reported, and only seven others have agreed to submit further information. The EPA initially invited over 500 companies and organizations to take part in the program.

This is not the first time EDF has pointed out problems with the EPA’s voluntary program. In September of 2007, they criticized the program, saying that mandatory reporting rules are needed. The EPA calls the program a success in their most recent report.

Nanomaterials and materials used in conjunction with them are being used more and more readily in commercial products, but few have been studied to determine risks.

Email this story Print this post Add your comments

Advertisers

Make sustainability part of your strategy.

Get equipped at the SAP Sustainability Resource Center. >>

Unclear about the EPA's new GHG Rule?

Learn how it could affect your business. >>

EPA mandatory emissions reporting starts Jan 1st

CSA Standards can help your organization get ready for compliance. Find out how. >>

Product Environmental Compliance Best Practices

How to achieve compliance at a significantly lower cost. Download the full report. >>

Join the Discussion

Reader Comments

The story is incomplete without mentioning the research showing the health hazard posed by carbon nanotubes, http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?id=carbon-nanotube-danger, use of which is still not regulated.

Nancy Somerville | April 13th, 2009

Recent Daily News [ see all ]

11/20/2009
11/19/2009
11/18/2009

Charts [ see all ]

European Paper Industry Cuts CO2 Emissions by 42% since 1990

S. America Takes Most Urgent View of Copenhagen Talks

Nike Tops Annual Climate Action Scores

Oceans May Trap more Carbon than Forests

Jobs

View All Jobs >> Post a Job >>

Comments and Discussions

Trade Association on Trade Group on EPA Chemical Regs: ‘If Everything is a Priority, Then Nothing is a Priority’
"Seriously… that..."

Gary Markowitz on Supermarkets Tackle Emissions Reductions, Fuel Efficiency
"Supermarkets waste over 10 percent of their energy through improper..."

peter in ireland on Ontario May Follow California’s Lead on TV Energy Efficiency
"Governor Schwarzenegger is shooting himself in the foot! 1...."

Environmental Leader on S. America Takes Most Urgent View of Copenhagen Talks
"The survey respondents (the PDF report mentions 4,000 respondents in 38..."

Jake on UPS Trying New Hydraulic Hybrid Trucks
"A point of clarification: the Reuters press release referenced herein reports that 20 UPS will purchase..."

Custom Organic Shirts on S. America Takes Most Urgent View of Copenhagen Talks
"90% of North Americans believe it is urgent to get a global climate..."

peter dublin on California City’s Green Building Ordinance Applies to Commercial Buildings
"Why energy efficiebnt regulation on buildings –..."

Environmental Leader