January 16, 2009
U.S. Climate Action Partnership Calls For 42% Emissions Cut By 2030
The U.S. Climate Action Partnership recently unveiled A Blueprint for Legislative Action (PDF), which calls for a cap-and-trade system, a 42 percent emissions reduction below 2005 levels by 2030 and 80 percent by 2050, limits on emissions from petroleum products and natural gas, and a carbon market board to examine offsets and contain costs, Washington Post reports.
The plan would also require coal plants permitted after Jan. 1, 2015, to keep their level of CO2 to less than half of levels currently considered “normal.”
The plan has elements designed to win corporate support, but those will likely be criticized by some supporters of cap-and-trade. Some lawmakers may also hesitate to support a proposal that could cost up to $540 million a year for a 1,000 megawatt plant so it can capture CO2 emissions.
The group was formed in 2007 by General Electric, DuPont, Alcoa, Caterpillar, Duke Energy, PG&E, FPL Group, PNM Resources, BP, Lehman Brothers, Environmental Defense, Natural Resources Defense Council, Pew Center on Global Climate Change, and World Resources Institute.
(This article has been corrected, it had incorrectly stated that USCAP called for a 42 percent emissions reduction below 2005 levels by 2050. It is actually calling for a a 42 percent emissions reduction below 2005 levels by 2030.)
Advertisers
Make sustainability part of your strategy.
Get equipped at the SAP Sustainability Resource Center. >>
EFFECTIVELY MANAGE WATER COMPLIANCE
Understand how increased enforcement may affect your company. Find out more >>
EPA mandatory emissions reporting starts Jan 1st
CSA Standards can help your organization get ready for compliance. Find out how. >>
Join the Discussion
Recent Daily News [ see all ]
- 11/06/2009
- 11/05/2009
- 11/04/2009
- Emissions Intensity Falling Globally
- JohnsonDiversey Ups GHG Reduction Target to 25%
- Sainsbury’s Offers Free London Electric Car Charging
- Carbon Trading Could Trigger a ‘Sub-prime Style’ Economic Crash
- Peabody, Exxon Accused of Undermining Climate Talks
- BMW, Toyota, Ford Tout Eco-cars
- In ‘Apathy Gap,’ Energy Efficiency at Home Ranks Low
- China Pushes for CO2 Storage, Not Emissions Reductions
- Clean Tech VC Funding On Rebound, Up 50% Since 2nd Quarter
- IECC Building Code Recommendations Add Up to 30% in Energy Efficiency Gains
- Disney Buys $7M in Reforestation Offsets, a Corporate Record
- McKesson to Save $300K Via Fuel-Efficient Vehicles
- Sprint to Save $2.1M With Eco-Friendly Packaging
- U.S. Export-Import Bank Adopts Carbon Policy to Support Renewable Energy
- Greening the Automotive Supply Chain
- Yokohama Rubber Cuts GHG Emissions 13.4% in 2008
- Electronics Industry Lawsuit Called ‘Attack on States’ Rights’
- Wal-Mart Adding LEDs to 650 Stores
- One Committee Down for Senate Climate Bill, Five More to Go
- EU Poised to Give Heavy Industry Free Carbon Permits
- ResponsibleTravel.com Scuttles Carbon Offsetting Option
- U.S. Cap-and-Trade Creates Winners and Losers among Largest Emitters
- DOE Awards $155M to Make Industrial Sector More Energy Efficient
- System Upgrades Power Up Energy Savings for Hotels
- Xerox Cuts GHG Emissions by 20% from 2002
- Waste Management Landfill Gas Project Complete
- Intel, Pepsi, Kohl’s Stay Atop Green Power Partnership list
- Wal-Mart Thinks Big With Smaller Stores
- Despite Critics, Gore ‘Proud’ to Invest in Green Firms
- Metal Recyclers Spar Over Ship Recycling Site
Industry Voices [ see all ]
A Roadmap for a Renewable Energy Partnership
Brad Cashaw
Vice President
Quaker Foods and Snacks Supply Chain and Sustainability
Forest Carbon Core to Climate Change Deal
Chris Elliott
Forest Carbon Initiative Lead
World Wildlife Fund
VCS and CarbonFix Tops in Review of Forestry Carbon Standards
Paulo Lopes
Carbon Management Consultant
Carbon Clear






Reader Comments
It’s really too bad that these corporations feel compelled to sign on to such nonsense in order to continue to do business. We are going to continue being bullied and brainwashed by these environmental groups to the point that there will be no reason for any industry to even try to survive. These climate change freaks are going to destroy us.
Glennis | January 19th, 2009