January 26, 2009
Obama Order Clears Way For New Auto Emissions Rules, Clean-Air Waiver
President Obama has ordered the EPA to reconsider state requests to decide their own auto emissions standards, The Boston Globe reports.
Obama signed his first two Presidential Memoranda and told a White House gathering that California and several other states have tried to come up with tougher emission standards but that “Washington stood in their way,” AP reports. But he seemed to endorse the waiver request, saying that such moves are “the first steps” toward “energy independence,” USA Today reports.
Lisa Jackson, the new EPA chief, recently signaled that she would move quickly to review California’s request for a waiver from the Clean Air Act to enforce its own vehicle emissions standards.
According to the Clean Air Act, California can enact pollution laws stricter than the federal laws, provided it is given a waiver from the EPA. But in 2007, the Bush administration denied California’s request to enact tougher tailpipe emissions standards. That denial followed a drawn out legal battle between automakers, California, and other states.
California standards would require auto companies to achieve a 30 percent reduction of emissions by cars, trucks and sport utility vehicles by 2016. Arizona, Connecticut, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont and Washington have already adopted California’s standards.
Obama also ordered his Transportation Department to enact short-term rules on how automakers can improve fuel efficiency of their new models by the 2011 model year. A 2007 law called for an industrywide increase to an average 35 mile per gallon for cars, small trucks and SUVs over the next 13 years, an increase of 10 mpg or 40 percent over what the entire fleet averages today. But the Bush administration failed to write any regulations to enforce the new law, The New York Times reports, even though they asked for it to be crafted.
The administration is not trying to burden struggling automakers, Obama said that the administration wasn’t trying to burden struggling automakers but to “help American automakers prepare for the future.”
“Our nation’s automakers are struggling — drastically restructuring and shedding jobs just to stay afloat,” said Antonia Ferrier, press secretary to House Minority Leader John Boehner. “And now they are being forced to spend billions of dollars to comply with California’s emissions standards, instead of using that money to save American jobs.”
GM, Ford and Chrysler have all included green initiatives in their requests for federal aid. (In November, seven state attorney generals wrote to Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, urging them to require the Big Three automakers to produce more fuel-efficient cars and cut GHG emissions in order to receive any federal aid.)
Major U.S. automakers and industry trade associations spent $62.6 million on lobbying in 2007 with the energy bills and the Bush administration’s efforts to craft new fuel rules dominating their spending.
Obama also ordered federal departments and agencies to find new ways to save energy and be more environmentally friendly. In 2007, Bush issued an executive order requiring federal agencies to cut their energy consumption, shift federal fleets to plug-in hybrid vehicles, and expand procurement programs to focus on environmentally friendly products.
Advertisers
Make sustainability part of your strategy.
Get equipped at the SAP Sustainability Resource Center. >>
Unclear about the EPA's new GHG Rule?
Learn how it could affect your business. >>
EPA mandatory emissions reporting starts Jan 1st
CSA Standards can help your organization get ready for compliance. Find out how. >>
Product Environmental Compliance Best Practices
How to achieve compliance at a significantly lower cost. Download the full report. >>
Join the Discussion
Recent Daily News [ see all ]
- 11/20/2009
- 11/19/2009
- 11/18/2009
- Ontario May Follow California’s Lead on TV Energy Efficiency
- EPA Is One Step Closer to New Ship Emissions Standards
- European Paper Industry Cuts CO2 Emissions by 42% since 1990
- CDP Launches Water Disclosure Project
- Whirlpool Cuts Water Use by Nearly 22% from 2004 to 2008
- National Grid Again Rejects High Costs of Offshore Wind
- California City’s Green Building Ordinance Applies to Commercial Buildings
- Agilent To Save $3.5M Over 10 Years With Solar
- S. America Takes Most Urgent View of Copenhagen Talks
- Texas, China Wind Partners May Build U.S. Factory to Appease Critical Lawmaker
- Volvo, Mack Engines First to Meet 2010 EPA Emissions Standards
- Around the Web – Nike, Google, Nissan, Bush’s Green Library, WWF
- Fossil Fuel Emissions Rose 29% since 2000
- SEC Charges Four in ‘Green’ Investment Ponzi Scheme
- No Sunny Skies for Two Solar Projects in Texas, California
- Canada Delays GHG Emissions Regs, Russia Ups Emissions Cuts
- News Corp. Taps Hara for Energy Efficiency, Environmental Management
- Rising Sea Levels Would Hit U.S. East Coast Hardest
- Building an Energy-Efficient Data Center Using Virtualization Technology
- Trade Group on EPA Chemical Regs: ‘If Everything is a Priority, Then Nothing is a Priority’
- A/V Equipment Gets New Energy Star Requirements
- By Scaling Back Catalogs, JC Penney to Save 30% on Paper
- Around the Web – Starbucks, EcoFactor, UPS, Brownfields, Eco-Labels
- Subaru Touts Energy & Environmental Initiatives
- U.S., China Partner on Renewable Energy, Energy Efficiency
- Green Buildings Do Double Duty: Reduce Energy Use, Lower Financial Risk
- UK to Ease Rules for On-Site Renewable Energy Installations
- Intel Eyes Wind, Electric Cars
- Nike Tops Annual Climate Action Scores
- Iranian Tanker Firm to Cut Fuel Use 28%
- Corporate Jetsetters Can be Carbon Offsetters
- USPS Energy Use Down 9% From 2005 to 2008
- From Solar Applications to Christmas, LEDs Light the Night
- EPA May Regulate Sulfur Dioxide Emissions on Hourly Basis
- MITEI: Sustainable Energy & Terawatt-Scale Photovoltaics
- Around the Web – Health Care & Energy, Shell, NBC
Charts [ see all ]
Popular Topics
Energy Efficiency
Data Center
Emissions
Facilities
Electricity
Sustainability
Water
Supply Chain
Efficiency
Green Marketing
Strategy & Leadership
Research
Fleets & Transportation
Carbon Finance
Conventional Energy
Clean Energy
Waste & Recycling
Paper & Packaging
Policy & Law
Utilities
Construction
Comments and Discussions
Trade Association on Trade Group on EPA Chemical Regs: ‘If Everything is a Priority, Then Nothing is a Priority’
"Seriously… that..."
Gary Markowitz on Supermarkets Tackle Emissions Reductions, Fuel Efficiency
"Supermarkets waste over 10 percent of their energy through improper..."
peter in ireland on Ontario May Follow California’s Lead on TV Energy Efficiency
"Governor Schwarzenegger is shooting himself in the foot! 1...."
Environmental Leader on S. America Takes Most Urgent View of Copenhagen Talks
"The survey respondents (the PDF report mentions 4,000 respondents in 38..."
Jake on UPS Trying New Hydraulic Hybrid Trucks
"A point of clarification: the Reuters press release referenced herein reports that 20 UPS will purchase..."
Custom Organic Shirts on S. America Takes Most Urgent View of Copenhagen Talks
"90% of North Americans believe it is urgent to get a global climate..."
peter dublin on California City’s Green Building Ordinance Applies to Commercial Buildings
"Why energy efficiebnt regulation on buildings –..."





Reader Comments
Wow. It sure makes sense to bail out the big 3 to the tune of billions and then turn around and kick them to the curb with regulations they can’t even begin to predict, much less plan for. Another clear indication that this administration hasn’t got the sense God gave a goose!
Glennis | January 27th, 2009
The comments from Antonia Ferrier, press secretary to House Minority Leader John Boehner, continue to prove that either they don’t get it YET…or that the money from the auotmakers lobbying or lack there of will personally impact Mr.Boehner. Ya think…?
Iain | January 27th, 2009
Regulations that they can’t even predict?? Where have they been for the past ten years while the world was talking about carbon emissions? Or while foreign companies were taking the low-end market out of their hands?
If they had realized where the world was already going then they may not have come to this point. Unfortunately this has grown larger than the economic status of a few American car companies. We are all stakeholders now.
newphase75 | January 27th, 2009