January 30, 2009
Trucking Industry Asks Congress For 65 MPH Speed Limit
The American Trucking Associations (ATA) is seeking support for the industry’s environmental initiatives from Congress. The initiatives are expected to cut fuel consumption by 86 billion gallons and reduce all vehicles’ carbon footprint by almost a billion tons over the next 10 years.
The association is asking Congress to enact a national 65 mph speed limit and increase funding for the EPA’s SmartWay program. ATA also wants Congress to support national fuel economy standards for medium and heavy-duty trucks and to implement financial incentives to expedite the introduction of idling reduction equipment.
Investment in infrastructure improvements could ease congestion, save 32 billion gallons of fuel, and cut carbon emissions by 314 million tons over 10 years – according to the ATA.
The association is also urging Congress to promote the use of more productive truck combinations, which could save more than 20.5 billion gallons of diesel fuel and cut emissions by 227 million tons over 10 years.
Last summer, ATA filed a lawsuit challenging plans by L.A. port officials to ban pre-1989 trucks from its port. The request was later denied.
Advertisers
Enhance Sustainability. Improve Profitability.
Learn how at the SAP Sustainability Resource Center. >>
EFFECTIVELY MANAGE WATER COMPLIANCE
Understand how increased enforcement may affect your company. Find out more >>
EPA mandatory emissions reporting starts Jan 1st
CSA Standards can help your organization get ready for compliance. Find out how. >>
Join the Discussion
Recent Daily News [ see all ]
- 11/06/2009
- 11/05/2009
- 11/04/2009
- Emissions Intensity Falling Globally
- JohnsonDiversey Ups GHG Reduction Target to 25%
- Sainsbury’s Offers Free London Electric Car Charging
- Carbon Trading Could Trigger a ‘Sub-prime Style’ Economic Crash
- Peabody, Exxon Accused of Undermining Climate Talks
- BMW, Toyota, Ford Tout Eco-cars
- In ‘Apathy Gap,’ Energy Efficiency at Home Ranks Low
- China Pushes for CO2 Storage, Not Emissions Reductions
- Clean Tech VC Funding On Rebound, Up 50% Since 2nd Quarter
- IECC Building Code Recommendations Add Up to 30% in Energy Efficiency Gains
- Disney Buys $7M in Reforestation Offsets, a Corporate Record
- McKesson to Save $300K Via Fuel-Efficient Vehicles
- Sprint to Save $2.1M With Eco-Friendly Packaging
- U.S. Export-Import Bank Adopts Carbon Policy to Support Renewable Energy
- Greening the Automotive Supply Chain
- Yokohama Rubber Cuts GHG Emissions 13.4% in 2008
- Electronics Industry Lawsuit Called ‘Attack on States’ Rights’
- Wal-Mart Adding LEDs to 650 Stores
- One Committee Down for Senate Climate Bill, Five More to Go
- EU Poised to Give Heavy Industry Free Carbon Permits
- ResponsibleTravel.com Scuttles Carbon Offsetting Option
- U.S. Cap-and-Trade Creates Winners and Losers among Largest Emitters
- DOE Awards $155M to Make Industrial Sector More Energy Efficient
- System Upgrades Power Up Energy Savings for Hotels
- Xerox Cuts GHG Emissions by 20% from 2002
- Waste Management Landfill Gas Project Complete
- Intel, Pepsi, Kohl’s Stay Atop Green Power Partnership list
- Wal-Mart Thinks Big With Smaller Stores
- Despite Critics, Gore ‘Proud’ to Invest in Green Firms
- Metal Recyclers Spar Over Ship Recycling Site
Industry Voices [ see all ]
A Roadmap for a Renewable Energy Partnership
Brad Cashaw
Vice President
Quaker Foods and Snacks Supply Chain and Sustainability
Forest Carbon Core to Climate Change Deal
Chris Elliott
Forest Carbon Initiative Lead
World Wildlife Fund
VCS and CarbonFix Tops in Review of Forestry Carbon Standards
Paulo Lopes
Carbon Management Consultant
Carbon Clear






Reader Comments
This is interesting. I thought I remembered that the trucking industry was on the opposite side of the debate the last time that national speed limits were discussed by Congress.
It is always fascinating to see the various requests to Congress – both in terms of everything included in the stimulus bill and everything else that Congress will have to deal with. I’m curious to see how this particular Congress will handle all of the competing priorities. Like in this case, I generally support the original proposal but the previous national speed limit debates have always seemed very long and drawn out. I hope if Congress does debate it again that they can come to a decision quicker.
The Democrats are touting their first 100 days as the time when they are going to get a tremendous amount accomplished. I hope they do accomplish something significant in the first 100 days. It seemed like the last Congress didn’t accomplish much in all of 2008. I saw that the Friends of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce is asking people to give their opinion on the most important thing for Congress to do in their first 100 days. Then they’re going to work to get Congress to accomplish what the public actually wants them to do. Make sure to add your opinion so Congress can know what our priorities are – http://www.friendsoftheuschamber.com/email/email4.cfm?id=200
JJ | January 30th, 2009
The last paragraph of this story misrepresents the nature of the American Trucking Associations’ lawsuit against the Ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach. The lawsuit is very specific in opposing only parts of the Ports’ concession plans. ATA supports the banning of older trucks from the ports, the program to subsidize newer trucks through a container fee, and the rolling schedule for banning older trucks from the ports in favor of newer trucks that produce less emissions. The ATA opposes only those parts of the concession plans that will have no effect in cleaning the air and which the Constitution, Congress and the U.S. Supreme Court have declared improper and illegal local government intrusion into interstate commerce. These parts of the concession plans regulate rates, routes and services that trucking firms can offer their customers, and, in the case of Los Angeles, bans independent owner operators from the business.
Clayton Boyce, American Trucking Associations
Clayton Boyce | February 2nd, 2009