February 2, 2009
Toy Makers Get 1-Year Reprieve on Toxic Testing
Federal regulators postponed testing requirements that would have forced manufacturers to shell out large fees for failing to check childrens’ products for lead content, writes the LA Times.
The Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) deferred the Feb. 10 deadline that it had set for producers and importers of children’ s goods to test all items to ensure they don’t contain more than 600 parts per million of lead. The CPSC also gave them an extra year to test for phthalates, which are chemicals often used in plastic.
Still, manufacturers could face civil and criminal penalties if they put products that exceed the lead limits on the market.
The industry is still waiting for guidelines for toys and clothing made from natural materials. And there are exceptions: manufacturers still must test products for small parts that may break off, lead content in children’s jewelry, and lead paint. They have to make sure that cribs conform to legal standards.
Many in the industry have said they are willing to cooperate – but on a more realistic timetable, according to CPSC spokesman Joseph Martyak.
In July ‘08, House and Senate lawmakers agreed to permanently ban three types of phthalates from children’s toys and to outlaw three other phthalates from products, a law that came into effect last month.
Consumers and advocate groups have started taking matters into their own hands, using specialized technology like X-ray guns to detect unsafe levels of lead and other chemicals in toys.
Advertisers
Stay competitive through sustainability.
Find out how at the SAP Sustainability Resource Center. >>
EFFECTIVELY MANAGE WATER COMPLIANCE
Understand how increased enforcement may affect your company. Find out more >>
EPA mandatory emissions reporting starts Jan 1st
CSA Standards can help your organization get ready for compliance. Find out how. >>
Join the Discussion
Recent Daily News [ see all ]
- 11/06/2009
- 11/05/2009
- 11/04/2009
- Emissions Intensity Falling Globally
- JohnsonDiversey Ups GHG Reduction Target to 25%
- Sainsbury’s Offers Free London Electric Car Charging
- Carbon Trading Could Trigger a ‘Sub-prime Style’ Economic Crash
- Peabody, Exxon Accused of Undermining Climate Talks
- BMW, Toyota, Ford Tout Eco-cars
- In ‘Apathy Gap,’ Energy Efficiency at Home Ranks Low
- China Pushes for CO2 Storage, Not Emissions Reductions
- Clean Tech VC Funding On Rebound, Up 50% Since 2nd Quarter
- IECC Building Code Recommendations Add Up to 30% in Energy Efficiency Gains
- Disney Buys $7M in Reforestation Offsets, a Corporate Record
- McKesson to Save $300K Via Fuel-Efficient Vehicles
- Sprint to Save $2.1M With Eco-Friendly Packaging
- U.S. Export-Import Bank Adopts Carbon Policy to Support Renewable Energy
- Greening the Automotive Supply Chain
- Yokohama Rubber Cuts GHG Emissions 13.4% in 2008
- Electronics Industry Lawsuit Called ‘Attack on States’ Rights’
- Wal-Mart Adding LEDs to 650 Stores
- One Committee Down for Senate Climate Bill, Five More to Go
- EU Poised to Give Heavy Industry Free Carbon Permits
- ResponsibleTravel.com Scuttles Carbon Offsetting Option
- U.S. Cap-and-Trade Creates Winners and Losers among Largest Emitters
- DOE Awards $155M to Make Industrial Sector More Energy Efficient
- System Upgrades Power Up Energy Savings for Hotels
- Xerox Cuts GHG Emissions by 20% from 2002
- Waste Management Landfill Gas Project Complete
- Intel, Pepsi, Kohl’s Stay Atop Green Power Partnership list
- Wal-Mart Thinks Big With Smaller Stores
- Despite Critics, Gore ‘Proud’ to Invest in Green Firms
- Metal Recyclers Spar Over Ship Recycling Site
Industry Voices [ see all ]
A Roadmap for a Renewable Energy Partnership
Brad Cashaw
Vice President
Quaker Foods and Snacks Supply Chain and Sustainability
Forest Carbon Core to Climate Change Deal
Chris Elliott
Forest Carbon Initiative Lead
World Wildlife Fund
VCS and CarbonFix Tops in Review of Forestry Carbon Standards
Paulo Lopes
Carbon Management Consultant
Carbon Clear






Reader Comments
Thank gosh this is happening. However many children died or got sick last year will only be repeated once more. After all, money is WAY more important than kids. Let’s let a few kids die so we protect our profit margin…
Is it just me or is there something major wrong??
Iain | February 3rd, 2009